![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Clanton, AL
Posts: 1,253
|
Re: 4 cylinder '67 C-10
Quote:
In my opinion, the 151cid is a dog & a P.O.S. They were notorious for getting hot spots due to carbon buildup & burning the #2 or #3 piston.
__________________
85' CUCV M1009!!! The newest addition! 6.2diesel, Th400, NP208, & only 36k miles! 70' C-10 LWB Fleetside - Looking good these days! ![]() 05' Dodge Neon 88' Winner Escape Sport 1750 - 4.3v6 94' Seadoo SP 84' Honda TRX200, bare nekkid. Just a frame & tires. Always looking for another project or any good deal! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
I have a radical idea!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
|
Re: 4 cylinder '67 C-10
The 153 Chevy II engine was never called the Iron Duke. The Iron Duke was the 2.5L 151 cu in Pontiac built engine. I have an old magazine from 1977 introducing the Iron Duke . My 1982 Camaro owners manual refers to the 4 cyl engine in the Camaro as the 2.5L "Iron Duke". I do agree that the 153 is a better engine. My granddather had a old inboard boat built in 60's with a 153, and ran it all the way up until about 5 years ago with engine problems in all those years. I think some people have sorta retronamed both of the engines the 151 and 153 Iron Duke, but its not correct to my knowledge. I can't find any factory literature referring to the 153 as an Iron Duke engine.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435 ‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350 '69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT '69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435 '84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer 67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096 My trucks http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all Member of the 1-Ton Club! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|