The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2009, 09:46 AM   #1
strick9c10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 33
200-4R Conversion

I was wondering if anyone has done this conversion...

I have a 79 C-10 that I purchased recently. It has a 425 horse 355 small block between the fenders , but still has the original Saginaw 3 speed transmission in it (the guy never got around to swapping it out).

I want to switch to an automatic, because Muncie & T-10 four speeds are just way too much $$$ in my neck of the woods. I was going to use a TH350 short shaft unit, so I can keep the same driveshaft, but am having a real hard time finding a decent 69-81 unit.

I know the 200-4R tranny is the same length, etc., as a short shaft TH350, but will a 200-4R fit without modifications to the cab, floors, cross-member, etc.

Any ideas, thoughts, etc., are most appreciated & welcome!
strick9c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 10:42 AM   #2
bigblock73
yeller
 
bigblock73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 13,826
Re: 200-4R Conversion

It'll clear the body just fine, but you might have to slide the crossmember forward/backward slightly for it to bolt up.

200's are GREAT transmissions, CAr Craft had an article on them in their recent issue, featuring Art Carr...who is an OD expert.
bigblock73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 12:02 PM   #3
strick9c10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 33
200-4R Conversion

Thanks for the info. I read that article... that's what got me to thinking about using one. From what I've read, the 200-4R's have a lot more going for them than the more common 700 OD units.

Anyone have any more input re: the cross-member and other small details, like transmission lines, tv cables, detent cables, modulators & lines, and solenoids.

I'm old school... thanks for your info & patience!
strick9c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 12:25 PM   #4
morcey2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central utah, UT
Posts: 105
Re: 200-4R Conversion

I put a junk-yard 200-4R in a 73 Buick Century years ago and it was mostly trivial. I drove that sucker for another 40000 miles after the swap. A big boat getting 20+mpg! It was great!

You'll need to add a TV cable connector on your carb and setup the TV cable correctly, otherwise the new tranny will be very short for this world. You'll probably need to either switch to a radiator w/ an integral tranny cooler or run an aux cooler in front of the radiator. If you can get cooler lines and radiator from a truck w/ a 350 tranny, they should work for the 200-4R. On my swap, the cooler lines had to be bent very slightly to fit the new tranny.

If you're not getting a rebuilt unit, do yourself a favor and get a hardened stator support and have the pump rebuilt w/ a 10-vane pump w/ hardened vanes. The stock stator support isn't hardened and wears quite dramatically. If you are getting a rebuilt unit, make sure it has some basic upgrades. I'll find an article on it and post a link when I have a minute.

The crossmember/transmission mount is where I'm a little in the dark w/ trucks. The buick was easy because it came originally w/ a 350 and had a 400 as a option. I just kept the 350 mount and pushed the crossmember back to the 400 frame holes. I think that the trucks usually came w/ a short tailshaft 400 and used the same crossmember for the 350 so a 350 mount on the crossmember mounted in the 400 holes should work. Again, that's where I'm a little short on experience.

I love the 200-4R. I'm getting one out of an 86 regal (non-turbo unfortunately) and building it for 400+ hp sometime in the next little while. Then I'll have to find something to put it in.

Matt
morcey2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 12:57 PM   #5
strick9c10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 33
200-4R Conversion

One of the reasons why I purchased this truck is because many performance mods were already done. The truck already has a brand new Griffin radiator where you can plumb tranny lines into it... no need to swap.

Will pre-bent tranny lines (like from LMC) that would be for a TH350 work for the 200-4R? According to the research I've done, the 200-4R is of the same dimensions as a short shaft TH350. I've also read that you can use the same transmission mount and driveshaft. So I'm going to assume I won't have to modify or change the cross-member.

Lastly, sorry for the ignorance, but I'm going to assume that the tv cable replaces the "old" transmission modulator line.

Any other ideas, tips... let 'em rip!
strick9c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 01:33 PM   #6
Jonboy
Slots go on anything!
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 5,957
Re: 200-4R Conversion

Yes on both accounts. The trans cooler lines will work fine. The TV will replace both the modulator line and kick down cable.

You may have to move the crossmember back a little, but you can use the same crossmember and mount.
Jonboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 06:22 PM   #7
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 200-4R Conversion

there 9 sec buicks running them

there the same length at a th350

find one from a turbo buick monte ss hurst olds or gp 2+2 if possible there stronger
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 07:58 PM   #8
lurch115
Registered User
 
lurch115's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: iowa
Posts: 722
Re: 200-4R Conversion

ummm...i recall doing this same swap several years ago and had to move the tranny cross member back like 7 inches....
__________________

"Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you carry the wall with you."
'84 chevy half ton short box 2wd, 67,000 actual miles
'03 chevy 1500 HD crew cab 4x4 standard box, 6.0L
lurch115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 06:37 AM   #9
strick9c10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 33
200-4R Conversion

Thanks for the info! Some of the answers I was looking for just aren't out on the internet or in truck magazines. I did find two stories that give good info on how strong the 200-4R can be with some minor updates, as well as swapping one in a 1968 C-10.

Here are the links:

http://www.sporttruck.com/techarticl...ion/index.html

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...ild/index.html

In regards to the last two posts... from what I've read, GM as well as BOP used the same transmission in a number of different applications. In other words, the same transmission that was in a Buick GN was also in Grandma's grocery-getter Malibu. "Stronger" units were not limited only to the higher performance models.

Also, in moving the cross-member back 7 inches or so, are you sure this wasn't for a 700-4R unit? They are quite a bit longer in length. That's why I'm not using that particular unit.

Thanks again for everyone's input, opinion & help!
strick9c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 09:30 AM   #10
morcey2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central utah, UT
Posts: 105
Re: 200-4R Conversion

A couple more links for you:

http://www.maliburacing.com/transmission_swaps.html

http://www.442.com/oldsfaq/oft200.htm

The 350/powerglide/muncie-3-speed mount is 20 3/8" back from the front of the bellhousing. The 200-4R is 27" back. The 400 is 26 15/16" back, so close enough for a 200-4R. That's why the crossmember needs to move back about 7".

Keep us posted.

Matt
morcey2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 06:52 AM   #11
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 200-4R Conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by lurch115 View Post
ummm...i recall doing this same swap several years ago and had to move the tranny cross member back like 7 inches....
um for what there the same length as a th350
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 06:55 AM   #12
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 200-4R Conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by morcey2 View Post
A couple more links for you:

http://www.maliburacing.com/transmission_swaps.html

http://www.442.com/oldsfaq/oft200.htm

The 350/powerglide/muncie-3-speed mount is 20 3/8" back from the front of the bellhousing. The 200-4R is 27" back. The 400 is 26 15/16" back, so close enough for a 200-4R. That's why the crossmember needs to move back about 7".

Keep us posted.

Matt
y is it so far up on the trucks on a gm a body car with a th350 they will bolt right in place
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 07:04 AM   #13
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 200-4R Conversion

http://www.ckperformance.com/

http://www.turbobuick.com/

also the 200-4r brf code is the hp model and yes it was only offered in the upscale performance cars. not the grocery getters. i have one in my garage going into my gran sport.

Last edited by nekkidhillbilly; 04-11-2009 at 07:05 AM.
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2009, 07:16 AM   #14
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 200-4R Conversion

you want a brf, kz ,cz trans there all the hp models there shift points differ but are the same in strength
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 08:32 AM   #15
strick9c10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mid-Coast Maine
Posts: 33
200-4R Conversion

Thanks for all the help & info! I'll be on the look-out for those particular RPO codes nekkidhillbilly mentioned... although everywhere I've read from factory GM manuals, to books on rebuilding transmissions, and in many different magazines, it never mentions these particular units. Weird.

I guess moving the cross-member back is part of the game. To quote Sport Truck Magazine... "The 200-4R is the same length and uses the same yoke, gearshift, and cooler lines as a Powerglide or TH350. In fact, in a swap situation, all you have to do is move the trans crossmember, depending on what tailshaft you have."

Of course, it never says WHY you have to! But from the info listed here as well as from others I've talked to, it's because the mount is farther back. Same length, same mount, just a farther back connecting point.

Any other tips or info from anyone who has actually done this swap would be cool. Pictures would be really cool!
strick9c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 12:02 PM   #16
jdurant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 679
Re: 200-4R Conversion

They are different in the different models. They have different valve bodies and servos. The turbo Buicks and Monte Carlo SSs are a little better, but they should be all about the same strength. I thought the ss was labeled either cz or cq, depending on year. The buicks are labeled brf, bq. If the label is torn off of the tailshaft, then they should be labeled on the valve body or have a pink mark. If you do plan to rebuild, I know a guy who will truely truely do you right, but he is down here in Houston.
__________________
Joseph
87 Turbo Buick
92 5.0 Mustang coupe
87 GMC Sierra SWB
82 Chevy K5 Blazer 2wd
jdurant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 01:01 PM   #17
OrangeAnimal
Registered User
 
OrangeAnimal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 702
Re: 200-4R Conversion

I got a 200R4 from transmissioncenter.net for a 80 Elcamino check them out. I got a different crossmember to replace the factory one and it was moved back a bit. It was really not a big deal to move it and the driveshaft went right into it.
__________________
82 Chevy SWB "OrangeAnimal" Lot of Goodies! Sold
93 GMC 1500 "Angry Red" 383 TBI Powered Fun! 300hp/410ft.lbs.
09 Yaris wife's daily.
OrangeAnimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2009, 12:25 AM   #18
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 200-4R Conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdurant View Post
They are different in the different models. They have different valve bodies and servos. The turbo Buicks and Monte Carlo SSs are a little better, but they should be all about the same strength. I thought the ss was labeled either cz or cq, depending on year. The buicks are labeled brf, bq. If the label is torn off of the tailshaft, then they should be labeled on the valve body or have a pink mark. If you do plan to rebuild, I know a guy who will truely truely do you right, but he is down here in Houston.
there was a kz and cz they both where offered in ss i have kz at home the only main difference is the shift point setting in the valve bodies in hi po ones

Last edited by nekkidhillbilly; 04-16-2009 at 12:26 AM.
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 08:07 PM   #19
SS68
Registered User
 
SS68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 126
Re: 200-4R Conversion

whos the guy here down in houston? im about to pick one up this weekend here in dallas dont really know who to trust with a rebuild most those guys look like crooks
SS68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 10:35 PM   #20
nekkidhillbilly
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: hazard, ky
Posts: 1,674
Re: 200-4R Conversion

search on turbobuick and see they are the 200-4r gods
nekkidhillbilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 10:45 PM   #21
joe231
Registered User
 
joe231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 13,821
Re: 200-4R Conversion

bowtieoverdrives.com
__________________
CHEVY ONLY
joe231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 02:37 PM   #22
jdurant
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 679
Re: 200-4R Conversion

He's a good friend. His name is J.D. He's been building them on the side for a few years now and some have gone into really fast cars (one being his often daily driven high ten second 3500lb car). He's alot cheaper than anybody else and he will build it the way you want it. He's taken apart alot of trannys built by others. There have been a couple of instances where parts that people pay for aren't even there. It is hard to find somebody to trust.
Here are a couple of other guys known to build 200s.
century, pts, and ck performance
Century is also in the Houston area. Call around and get some prices from these guys.
I think you'll pay alot less and get more and sooner if you use J.D. I'll pm you his email address. I wouldn't let anybody else build one for me.
__________________
Joseph
87 Turbo Buick
92 5.0 Mustang coupe
87 GMC Sierra SWB
82 Chevy K5 Blazer 2wd
jdurant is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com