Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-22-2009, 01:15 PM | #26 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hammond, WI
Posts: 1,817
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
Quote:
So there's a possibility that my in town mpg could be more than my highway mpg? I don't see how that could happen.
__________________
Mike 2001 Dakota R/T - Silver CC - 1 of 1671 •360 w/46RE •392 limited slip 1972 Chevy Suburban - Turquoise/Black 1969 Chevy C/10 - Blue LWB •350 w/ 700R4 •3.73 posi •PS PB A/C - SOLD Using your turn signal is not "giving information to the enemy" 67-72 FAQ |
|
07-22-2009, 01:46 PM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Take Off
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
Hook up the vacuum advance. Also, make sure the vacuum secondaries are not opening too soon. You may have to go to a stiffer spring in the vacuum advance.
|
07-22-2009, 06:07 PM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Porter Ranch, CA
Posts: 978
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
As stated above, if you want to see what lower gears (numerically higher) will do for you, keep it in 3rd for an entire tank of gas and don't change any other driving habits, etc. If your mileage drops, don't change the rear end.
|
07-22-2009, 06:49 PM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tejas
Posts: 691
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
You either a-have 3.73's (which I think you do), or B-have a WAAAYY off speedometer. Borrow a gps from someone. I figured out the other day I had 3.73 gears, not 3.08's with the gps. You should be running 1636rpm in lockup at 70 with 3.08's and 31's. With 3.73's you'll run 1982rpm. This is on the bowtieoverdrives.com calculator. They also have a calc. for selecting speedometer gears and how fast you can go in each gear with different transmissions. Another thing is, you built a cammed 388 without a quadrajet and expected to get decent mileage?? That cam is a 224/230@.050 on a 110lsa. You'll never get mileage with that and especially with an Edelbrock. I'm not arguing that 10.5 mpg is normal though. That seems a little low. And 3.73's are probably your best bet for mileage on smaller tires, you might want to bump it up to 4.10's with those 31's. My 350 running 2900 rpm at 70 gets better mileage than you but I suspect this will fade with an xe262 and an Edelbrock in my future.
edit-just saw you had a holley, still not any better for mileage
__________________
'72 cheyenne super step, '05 long bed gmc Last edited by '72customdeluxe; 07-22-2009 at 06:50 PM. |
07-22-2009, 07:14 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: morrisdale pa
Posts: 46
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
Getting a bigger carb at least a 750cfm would be a great starting point a 650 is fine for a 350 but too small for that stroker and your rpms are right where you want them. if your after milage do not change your rearend. look at a dyno sheet for just about any 383 stroker and you'll see at 1900rpm you already have more torque than most stock 350s have throughout there entire power band. you have a tuning issue get a bigger carb and get it tuned. bring it to a dyno shop its amazing what they can do in just a hour or two. plus it'll be cheaper than changing out rearends! i do like 3.73 its what i installed in my 70 4x4 with a 388 stroker/t400 combo i only swapped out the 3.07s for playing in mud and snow and to teach them pesky mustangs and rice bunners whats up! and p.s. it didn't improve my milage at all! haha JUST MY 2c good luck
Last edited by 70duramax; 07-22-2009 at 07:16 PM. Reason: for got something |
07-22-2009, 07:18 PM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: morrisdale pa
Posts: 46
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
forgot i ran a 750 speed demon w/vac sec. exelent right out of the box very little tuning perfect for a 383
|
07-22-2009, 08:47 PM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eliot, Maine
Posts: 1,314
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
84 suburban 1/2 ton 2wd, 350 quadra-jet, 700r4. 3.73FD
=17-18mpg (once got 19mpg w/ 100,000 miles and low compression) w/ 406sbc swapped in place of 350 (stock intake and exhaust) =16-17mpg 87 suburban 1/2 ton 2wd, 350tbi, 700r4, 3.08FD swapped in the 84 rear axle and didn't lose any mpg. trucks have tall tires and that's why a somewhat aggressive gear AND an OD are the best combination unless all you do is drive 90mph all day long and don't use your truck as a truck. on a car, a 3.08 gear is a good idea if you don't have OD and the tires are on the shorter side. my 72 burb 3/4 ton 2wd, 307, 3 on the tree, 4.57FD, =10.75mpg on this last tank full. i did not exceeed 60mph saginaw OD unit, 4.10FD swap should get me well over 15mpg as the truck has taller tires than a 1/2 ton truck w/ a 3.73 |
07-23-2009, 08:13 AM | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,079
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
I ordered a rebuild kit for the Q-jet. and I'm gonna order an ignition tune-up kit.
I think I'll buy some rear-end fluid and change the fluid in the rear-end and check the gears at the same time.
__________________
-- Josh Instagram: @americanmusc1e OLD SKOOL-- 1970 C10. 454/Th400/3.07 posi Build Thread FARM TRUCK----1949 Chevrolet 3800 Power Wagon Hauler Build Thread 1999 4wd OBS Tahoe - daily. DM me if you can't see photos i posted |
07-23-2009, 08:37 AM | #34 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
Creative math will get you any MPG you want. It works for alot of people on here.
|
07-23-2009, 03:47 PM | #35 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: morrisdale pa
Posts: 46
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
lol! thats funny!
|
07-24-2009, 08:06 AM | #36 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
Quote:
Use full manifold vacuum - Last edited by Jim_PA; 07-24-2009 at 08:06 AM. |
|
07-24-2009, 08:08 AM | #37 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
With his combo, I doubt torque at 1900 RPM's is a problem.
|
07-24-2009, 09:37 AM | #38 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tejas
Posts: 691
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
1900rpm sounds peachy to me. You'd only be running 2300 rpm if you had 3.08's and 31's with no overdrive. With all that torque you should be gaining mileage. I still think you might have 3.73's because if it's running 1900 rpm like you said with 3.08's in overdrive locked up you'd be running 85 mph according to the bowtieoverdrives.com calculator. I think it'd be pretty easy to tell if you were going 85 in one of these trucks. But 3.73's match the description perfectly. You'll just have to gps it or count gears like you said when you pull the diff cover. You can also do the whole put it on jackstands and count driveshaft to tire revs thing without opening it
__________________
'72 cheyenne super step, '05 long bed gmc |
07-24-2009, 10:24 AM | #39 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
|
Re: 383/700r4/3.08........and 10.5MPG!!!!!!
Kind of apples and oranges, but I used to have an '88 Buick Lesabre. It had the 3800 V6, 2.73 gears in the transaxle (4T60) plus the overdrive in 4th gear. I would consistently get the same fuel mileage (between 27-29) in 3rd gear or 4th on the highway. That car didn't have a tach, though.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500 1996 Honda Accord 2007 Kawasaki KLR 650 |
Bookmarks |
|
|