The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2009, 05:21 PM   #1
bamafrost
Registered User
 
bamafrost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Florence, Alabama
Posts: 157
Optimal backspacing for '68 C10

Can anybody tell me what the optimal backspacing would be on my 1968 C10 SWB? Unsure whether to keep my 6 lug and have custom rallyes made or convert to 5 on 5. Either way, assuming I'll keep drums on the rear and go with 12" discs up front what is the ideal backspacing? Looking at over-sized rims...unsure if 16, 17.

Also, what's the general consensus on wheel adapters...safe, crazy, dumb?
I know they are not the BEST way to "get there".

Thanks for any help. Tom
__________________
Bamafrost
"Wars fought, uprisings quelled,
Coup d'Etats planned...right after my nap".


'68 Rambler American 2 door post
Built 340/727/8.75 w 3.73 posi
'68 C10 shortie soon to have a 2.5/4 drop
and new Americans: 16" x 8" chrome IROC's
bamafrost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 09:35 PM   #2
Jim 383
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Anaheim CA
Posts: 16
Re: Optimal backspacing for '68 C10

I've got a 68 lwb with 15x8 blazer wheels.they have 4 inches of back space.They would fit better with less backspace in back like 3 3/4" and more in the front like 4 1/4 or 4 1/2. I've got 285/70s on back and 255/70s in the front.I never had clearance problems until it was lowered with 2 1/2 drop spindles,maybe disc brakes widened the track a little.These trucks come with a wider track in front.
Jim 383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 07:33 AM   #3
bamafrost
Registered User
 
bamafrost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Florence, Alabama
Posts: 157
Re: Optimal backspacing for '68 C10

Jim...Thanks for the reply. I have some killer Torque Thrust ST's (18" fronts/20" rears...with 5 1/2" backspacing) ...but the only way they'll work is with 1"-1.5" wheel adapters and that concerns me. Have a buddy that has them on his race car and says I don't need to have any concerns.

Any thoughts on their safety? Las thing I want is to get this thing just the way I want it and have it get even lower while doing 70 mph. haha

Thanks again. Tom
__________________
Bamafrost
"Wars fought, uprisings quelled,
Coup d'Etats planned...right after my nap".


'68 Rambler American 2 door post
Built 340/727/8.75 w 3.73 posi
'68 C10 shortie soon to have a 2.5/4 drop
and new Americans: 16" x 8" chrome IROC's
bamafrost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2009, 08:12 AM   #4
screamin_c10
I dun gradjiated collij!!!
 
screamin_c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St. Helens Oregon
Posts: 1,751
Re: Optimal backspacing for '68 C10

Just keep in mind that 5 lug axles (71-72) are wider than their six lug brethren....So if you plan on going that route on your conversion it is going to change things as far as back spacing is concerned.....
screamin_c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 08:22 PM   #5
Jim 383
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Anaheim CA
Posts: 16
Re: Optimal backspacing for '68 C10

Modern aluminum billet spacers 1.5 " thick are probably stronger than your wheel centers. The old cast potmetal ones are the ones that established the bad reputation.A spacer that bolts to the hub and the wheels bolt to the spacer is the best way. A spacer that requires long studs is the worst.Some racing sanctioning bodies don't like spacers,but for just driving around with light loads I wouldn't worry I'm not any kind of expert though.It does give you a chance to fine tune the back spacing too. I have some on my Chevelle, I jacked it up put the wheels where i wanted them and measured the space between the back of the wheel and the hub.
Jim 383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 10:55 PM   #6
ap2002
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 247
Re: Optimal backspacing for '68 C10

I have some 16x10 6lug on my 68 they tuck in very nicely, but i cant remember the backspace, i want to say its 5.5? ill double check
__________________
1971 C-10 SWB - LS swap w/4L60e, 20x8.5front 20x12rear,
1968 C-10 SWB - 454 BB TH350 -Gone!
ap2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 11:10 PM   #7
ap2002
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 247
Re: Optimal backspacing for '68 C10

bolt pattern: 6lug, 6x5.5
offset: -24mm,
backspace: 4 1/2"
__________________
1971 C-10 SWB - LS swap w/4L60e, 20x8.5front 20x12rear,
1968 C-10 SWB - 454 BB TH350 -Gone!
ap2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 07:43 AM   #8
bamafrost
Registered User
 
bamafrost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Florence, Alabama
Posts: 157
Re: Optimal backspacing for '68 C10

Thanks for the input, I appreciate it. Tom
__________________
Bamafrost
"Wars fought, uprisings quelled,
Coup d'Etats planned...right after my nap".


'68 Rambler American 2 door post
Built 340/727/8.75 w 3.73 posi
'68 C10 shortie soon to have a 2.5/4 drop
and new Americans: 16" x 8" chrome IROC's
bamafrost is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com