The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-05-2010, 09:17 AM   #1
GKsport67
Registered User
 
GKsport67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Posts: 660
Cool Static vs Air Ride

Can anyone tell me if the ride difference between the two?
GKsport67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 10:08 AM   #2
JWall
Frequent Flyer
 
JWall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 2,258
Re: Static vs Air Ride

Air (when done correctly) rides a lot better than static.

I've had both. If you are trying to decide between the two it will just depend on several things including your budget, the use of the truck, etc.
__________________
- Justin
76 SWB C-10 - 98 SWB C1500 (x2)
1 Owner 1976 SWB
JWall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 10:15 AM   #3
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Re: Static vs Air Ride

There are so many variables that it's very hard to give a short answer. If done properly with quality components and tires that have a bit of sidewall, a static drop will ride great. In some cases it might ride better than stock.

That same theory applies to air suspension. If done properly with quality components, it will rid very good too.

What you have to consider is the elements that usually accompany a bagged vehicle. Typically a bagged truck will have low profile tires, shorter shocks, etc that combined will limit travel and create a firmer ride.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 10:39 AM   #4
GKsport67
Registered User
 
GKsport67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Posts: 660
Re: Static vs Air Ride

I would like to go a 4x6 F/R disc REDcalipers, drilled rotors real high quality stuff. I like that nose dive stance. I wanna go 20x8 front & 20x10 rear Vinspeeds on 245/40f & 285/35r tyres.

I like what http://www.hotchkis.net/ do to classics.
GKsport67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 10:42 AM   #5
GKsport67
Registered User
 
GKsport67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Posts: 660
Re: Static vs Air Ride

That nose dive stance im talkn about...
GKsport67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 10:45 AM   #6
GKsport67
Registered User
 
GKsport67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Posts: 660
Cool Re: Static vs Air Ride

Quote:
Originally Posted by JWall View Post
Air (when done correctly) rides a lot better than static.

I've had both. If you are trying to decide between the two it will just depend on several things including your budget, the use of the truck, etc.
Whats the cost difference? When done correctly? What should i look for in the build quality?
GKsport67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 10:49 AM   #7
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,070
Re: Static vs Air Ride

My 68 & 74 were both set-up very similarly. Dropped spindles up front, cut 1-coil from the springs, poly bushed large diameter OE sway bars, & standard replacement shocks w/custom mounts to optimize shock travel.

The rears were drastically different. The 68 had bags, blocks, modified shock brackets, standard replacement shocks. The 74 has a flip kit on the OE HD 8-leaf spring pack, 2" shackles, shock extenders, & replacement gas shocks.

The 68 rides much better (and that's just bags on the rear). Put them up front as well (making sure the ride height is @ the bags optimum pressure) & it would ride better. With the right sway bars & shocks, the handling will be equal as well. I'm currently working toward replacing the 74's rear suspension w/some truck arms w/bags & will be adding a Porterbuilt Dropmember to the front.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 03-05-2010 at 10:51 AM.
SCOTI is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 11:25 AM   #8
GKsport67
Registered User
 
GKsport67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Posts: 660
Exclamation Re: Static vs Air Ride

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
My 68 & 74 were both set-up very similarly. Dropped spindles up front, cut 1-coil from the springs, poly bushed large diameter OE sway bars, & standard replacement shocks w/custom mounts to optimize shock travel.

The rears were drastically different. The 68 had bags, blocks, modified shock brackets, standard replacement shocks. The 74 has a flip kit on the OE HD 8-leaf spring pack, 2" shackles, shock extenders, & replacement gas shocks.

The 68 rides much better (and that's just bags on the rear). Put them up front as well (making sure the ride height is @ the bags optimum pressure) & it would ride better. With the right sway bars & shocks, the handling will be equal as well. I'm currently working toward replacing the 74's rear suspension w/some truck arms w/bags & will be adding a Porterbuilt Dropmember to the front.

Where did you get those bags, blocks, modified shock brackets, standard replacement shocks?


What brand are those poly bushed large diameter OE sway bars?

I need to upgrade to 5 lugz & disc brake. Can i get parts from a junkyard to cut the cost down?
GKsport67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 11:25 AM   #9
72BlckButy
Tot Roddin'
 
72BlckButy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 24,461
Re: Static vs Air Ride

Be prepared to receive a wide array of responses to your question. I have never owned a bagged truck (plan to in the future) but currently have a staticly dropped truck (4.5/6" ECE) and love the ride.

As Ken mentioned above, quality parts for either suspension will provide for superior ride/handling.

Are you planning on hauling anything in the bed? The I would consider running bags at least in the rear. Depending on the load a static rear drop will tend to decrease the rear suspension travel when loaded.

How much do you have to spend? It sounds like you will have quite an extensive suspension setup with F/R disc, new wheels/tires, and all new suspension components. I would tell you to consider spending at least $4-6k on a quality static drop, wheels, brakes, tires; I would add another $2k onto that if you're running bags.

Just my opinion.... but it sounds like you are going to be using the best (Air Ride Tech, possibly SSBC or CPP piston calipers/rotors, etc.)

I would recommend researching several build threads to see what components work and which ones don't and see what other members have done. It will save you a lot of time and money by researching things from the beginning.
__________________
-Nate

1969 CST SWB - Project Blank Slate (4.5/6" ECE Static Drop, 6-lug disc brake upgrade (manual), Billet Specialties Vintec 20x8.5 255/40 (F) 20x10 295/40 (R), 250 I-6)
1960 AMF Skylark - Tot Roddin' (Lowered with custom frame; soon to include custom push bar and interior)
2008 Silverado CrewCab 1LT (5.3L, 3:73, 4x4, LT1, Z-71, Towing Package)

Last edited by 72BlckButy; 03-05-2010 at 11:26 AM.
72BlckButy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 11:38 AM   #10
GKsport67
Registered User
 
GKsport67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Posts: 660
Re: Static vs Air Ride

http://porterbuiltstreetrods.com/site/?p=81 this is "Sema Show" quality. looks strong enuff to keep a LS1 under control.

i wouldn't wanna lay my frame though,not my style.
GKsport67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 11:43 AM   #11
72BlckButy
Tot Roddin'
 
72BlckButy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 24,461
Re: Static vs Air Ride

A dropmember is a complete other type of suspension and in a ballpark all its own....
__________________
-Nate

1969 CST SWB - Project Blank Slate (4.5/6" ECE Static Drop, 6-lug disc brake upgrade (manual), Billet Specialties Vintec 20x8.5 255/40 (F) 20x10 295/40 (R), 250 I-6)
1960 AMF Skylark - Tot Roddin' (Lowered with custom frame; soon to include custom push bar and interior)
2008 Silverado CrewCab 1LT (5.3L, 3:73, 4x4, LT1, Z-71, Towing Package)
72BlckButy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 12:18 PM   #12
GKsport67
Registered User
 
GKsport67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Posts: 660
Re: Static vs Air Ride

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72BlckButy View Post
Be prepared to receive a wide array of responses to your question. I have never owned a bagged truck (plan to in the future) but currently have a staticly dropped truck (4.5/6" ECE) and love the ride.

As Ken mentioned above, quality parts for either suspension will provide for superior ride/handling.

Are you planning on hauling anything in the bed? The I would consider running bags at least in the rear. Depending on the load a static rear drop will tend to decrease the rear suspension travel when loaded.

How much do you have to spend? It sounds like you will have quite an extensive suspension setup with F/R disc, new wheels/tires, and all new suspension components. I would tell you to consider spending at least $4-6k on a quality static drop, wheels, brakes, tires; I would add another $2k onto that if you're running bags.

Just my opinion.... but it sounds like you are going to be using the best (Air Ride Tech, possibly SSBC or CPP piston calipers/rotors, etc.)

I would recommend researching several build threads to see what components work and which ones don't and see what other members have done. It will save you a lot of time and money by researching things from the beginning.
I would build a 4x6 static with bagz in the rear for hauling a motorcycle.

So for a good quality G Machine type build im looking to spend 9/10k ez?

Im not sure who i will use but ECE has a good reputation on qaulity & fitment. I have a catalogs from ECE,CPP,Brothers & Year One sittn here.

I need those RED calipers & drilled disc F/R. I also need good cornering
GKsport67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 12:23 PM   #13
72BlckButy
Tot Roddin'
 
72BlckButy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 24,461
Re: Static vs Air Ride

In my drop and disc brake upgrade (front disc) and rebuilt rear drums, I've got around $1.6-1.7k (including paint, grease, etc.). Tack on custom wheels ($1k-3k depending on choice) and tires (20" - $700+). Since you would consider bags in the rear subtract $120 from the rear springs, then add the price of the bags and air management. IMO, if you're going through the trouble of rear bags, just bag the front and be done.

It can be done for less but it sounds like you will be purchasing kits from reputable companies.
__________________
-Nate

1969 CST SWB - Project Blank Slate (4.5/6" ECE Static Drop, 6-lug disc brake upgrade (manual), Billet Specialties Vintec 20x8.5 255/40 (F) 20x10 295/40 (R), 250 I-6)
1960 AMF Skylark - Tot Roddin' (Lowered with custom frame; soon to include custom push bar and interior)
2008 Silverado CrewCab 1LT (5.3L, 3:73, 4x4, LT1, Z-71, Towing Package)
72BlckButy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 12:35 PM   #14
GKsport67
Registered User
 
GKsport67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Posts: 660
Re: Static vs Air Ride

http://www.hotchkis.net/slideshows/ ...no 67-72's. This i what im looking for a G-Machine Style suspension setup. ...it can be bagged but no body drop.

Last edited by GKsport67; 03-05-2010 at 12:42 PM.
GKsport67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 12:40 PM   #15
GKsport67
Registered User
 
GKsport67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Posts: 660
Re: Static vs Air Ride

Like this http://porterbuiltstreetrods.com/site/?p=225 but no body drop or crossmember.

Last edited by GKsport67; 03-05-2010 at 12:41 PM.
GKsport67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 01:36 PM   #16
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,070
Re: Static vs Air Ride

ECE for static drop kits. Ride Tech for 'basic' (no cutting of bed floor) air ride suspension that's geared toward sport vs. dragging the ground. Porterbuilt for the custom crossmembers that will get you as low w/more ground clearance using either coil-overs or air ride.

Quote:
Where did you get those bags, blocks, modified shock brackets, standard replacement shocks?
Bags were Firestones from Ride Tech. Blocks were CPP (1.5's w/15" wheels) or home-made 2" for larger diameter wheels. Modified shock brackets were the originals that I modified @ home.
Quote:
What brand are those poly bushed large diameter OE sway bars?
Energy Suspension poly bushings. The sway bars were from wrecking yard scavenging of 3/4 & 1-ton GM trucks (1.25" solid bars).
Quote:
I need to upgrade to 5 lugz & disc brake. Can i get parts from a junkyard to cut the cost down?
Yes. That's how I did it. I rebuilt the entire front suspension, added the sway-bar w/bushings, & upgraded to discs for ~$500.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 03-05-2010 at 01:37 PM.
SCOTI is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 04:02 PM   #17
Ackattack
Senior Member
 
Ackattack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Center KS
Posts: 3,524
Re: Static vs Air Ride

One thing on the bag set up. Most guys on here run air tanks, compressors and valves. All of these add cost to the bagged set up.

For my truck, since I only plan on lowering it at shows and I will be drag racing it and want to minimize weight I did not put in the tanks, compressors, and valves.

I'm running my bags (RE7s) with airlines connected to schrader valves. Then just air it up with a air compressor at home (I also have a portable air compressor I used for four wheeling and a 10 gal air tank I can take with me for shows, but remove for racing).

So my bag set up was fairly cheap. I did get shorter shocks, shock relocation brackets, and a longer/adjustable pan hard bar from ECE. But you probably need need that with either air or static drop.
Ackattack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 04:16 PM   #18
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,070
Re: Static vs Air Ride

Schraders only for the rear would be ok. Up front, long term you really should do the storage tank & compressor to ensure the alignment is where you want it.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 04:59 PM   #19
GKsport67
Registered User
 
GKsport67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta,Ga
Posts: 660
Re: Static vs Air Ride

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72BlckButy View Post
In my drop and disc brake upgrade (front disc) and rebuilt rear drums, I've got around $1.6-1.7k (including paint, grease, etc.). Tack on custom wheels ($1k-3k depending on choice) and tires (20" - $700+). Since you would consider bags in the rear subtract $120 from the rear springs, then add the price of the bags and air management. IMO, if you're going through the trouble of rear bags, just bag the front and be done.

It can be done for less but it sounds like you will be purchasing kits from reputable companies.

thanx for the clear pricing 72BlckButy. Time to do some research n get to work. I like the big caliper SSBC has but never priced their products.
GKsport67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2010, 12:51 PM   #20
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Re: Static vs Air Ride

Quote:
Originally Posted by GKsport67 View Post
.... I like the big caliper SSBC has but never priced their products.
Check out the brake upgrades CPP has to offer. They have been working hard to keep our members happy.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2010, 11:51 AM   #21
chevyrestoguy
Registered User
 
chevyrestoguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: apple valley, ca
Posts: 2,670
Re: Static vs Air Ride

I have always been curious about alignment issues with air bag systems. If the bags were set to a certain pressure and the front end was professionally aligned at that pressure, does it maintain tire wear like a properly aligned static system?

Question: On normal usage, are you guys moving the pressure around very often, or do you leave it at your alignment number? I see lots of mini-truck guys around here that are always hitting the switches, and wondered if it was really necessary.

Most of the bagged trucks I see have big diameter wheels, and those tires are expensive and are usually higher speed rated (softer than a normal passenger tire). That would get really expensive if the alignment wasn't dead-on all the time. This is the one area that is keeping me from going to an air-ride system.

Riding on a cushion of air versus a wound coil spring is definately going to ride better. Do you run a high or low pressure shock to account for the cushion of the air bag? Can you run a rear sway bar? Is there any type of air connector that you can use that will eliminate air leaks? Is bigger always better when it comes to tanks and compressors?

Sorry for all the questions, but I figure that this is the best place to ask them. There is some very sharp guys on this forum.
chevyrestoguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2010, 07:10 PM   #22
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,070
Re: Static vs Air Ride

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevyrestoguy View Post
I have always been curious about alignment issues with air bag systems. If the bags were set to a certain pressure and the front end was professionally aligned at that pressure, does it maintain tire wear like a properly aligned static system?
Exactly.... Return the pressure to the alignment set-point & you're good to go. Any deviation from that point will lead to possible pre-mature wear.

Quote:
Question: On normal usage, are you guys moving the pressure around very often, or do you leave it at your alignment number? I see lots of mini-truck guys around here that are always hitting the switches, and wondered if it was really necessary.
No, it's not necessary. I'm a set it & forget it guy.

Quote:
Most of the bagged trucks I see have big diameter wheels, and those tires are expensive and are usually higher speed rated (softer than a normal passenger tire). That would get really expensive if the alignment wasn't dead-on all the time. This is the one area that is keeping me from going to an air-ride system.
Use old school 15's or the latest big rollers. Keep the air psi @ the aligned set-point & you'll be fine.

Quote:
Riding on a cushion of air versus a wound coil spring is definately going to ride better. Do you run a high or low pressure shock to account for the cushion of the air bag? Can you run a rear sway bar? Is there any type of air connector that you can use that will eliminate air leaks? Is bigger always better when it comes to tanks and compressors?

Sorry for all the questions, but I figure that this is the best place to ask them. There is some very sharp guys on this forum.
I've used standard of the shelf replacement gas charged shocks so far. (Gabriel VST's & KYB GR-2's).
You can run a rear bar if desired.
Push to connect fittings or Swagelock fittings work. Just make sure w/the PTC fittings that the air line is cut square/90°.
You need enough air for the system. 5-6gal storage & 2-compressors will be adequate.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com