|
03-12-2010, 08:21 PM
|
#1 |
|
2WD Jimmy
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Davis County, Utah
Posts: 2,564
|
Brake line routing
OK,... does anyone know why GM routed the rear brake lines under the motor on the cross member and back down the passenger side frame rail instead of just going straight back on the drivers side frame rail?
|
|
|
|
03-12-2010, 08:50 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Muskegon,MI,USA
Posts: 6,026
|
Re: Brake line routing
I thought that it was because the gas line was on the passenger's side and the wiring is on the driver's side.
Jim
__________________
1971 Shortbox step side 4x4, 350 sbc, 3:07 rear end 1965 Impala SS 400 sbc, Muncie rock crusher 1966 Impala SS 396 bbc, TH 400 1969 El Camino, 350 sbc, TH 350 1971 Snowplow built on a Blazer frame 1972 GMC Short bed, stepside, TH 400, 427 BBC |
|
|
|
|
03-12-2010, 09:00 PM
|
#3 |
|
PROJECT 7DEUCE
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: GRANTS PASS OR
Posts: 21,608
|
Re: Brake line routing
You can go down anyside just pick one. Id guess since the brake line had to go to the passengerside caliper it would be cheaper on frame attachments??? Hell I really dont know but you can go down the driverside if you would like..
__________________
GO BIG GREEN  GO DUCKSMEMBER #6377 72 k-5 daily driver 6'' lift 35'' 350-350-205 slowly getting rust free. Project "7DEUCE" check out my build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=267665 Tim Powell..R.I.P EastSideLowlife..... R.I.P.. |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
