The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-19-2010, 05:02 PM   #1
menace121978
Registered User
 
menace121978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: orangevale, ca
Posts: 3,626
Re: 427 or 6.0

cool thread! i love hearing everyones opinion on this subject.

obviously i'd go with the new technology myself... i honestly believe that anyone who is voting for the old school big block hasnt had the opportunity to own or drive the new generation of muscle. i'll never go back
__________________
"Dennis the Menace"



1978 Silverado (2wd, 1/2 ton, short bed)complete nut & bolt frame off restomod LQ9/4L80E
MY LS SWAP/FRAME OFF BUILD BOOK

2006 TBSS way too much to list
menace121978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 06:31 PM   #2
69BBsuburban
Right in front of you.
 
69BBsuburban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roy, Wa
Posts: 584
Re: 427 or 6.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by menace121978 View Post
i honestly believe that anyone who is voting for the old school big block hasnt had the opportunity to own or drive the new generation of muscle. i'll never go back
I've driven BRAND NEW Corvettes, etc....
I still prefer the brute force and crudeness of my old jalopies....it's more than just the performance....there's a certain style and "coolness" factor no newer, plastic car can ever dublicate. Just my old school .02.....I'm an oddball
__________________
Pinstriping by Josh
'78 Chevy Silverado SWB (lowered, 454)
'90 Chevy Sport Truck
'68 Dodge Charger R/T
1930 Ford Model A

Last edited by 69BBsuburban; 05-19-2010 at 06:31 PM.
69BBsuburban is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 07:24 PM   #3
okieraptor
Registered User
 
okieraptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
Re: 427 or 6.0

I agree the old just has that "coolness" to it. I forsee it as nothing less than a 496 when its all said and done. It will be just the cruzzer so load and lopy are deffenitly in the mix for it. I love the old skool but the way the new motors are proven them selves is making me like them A LOT!

On a side note my dad told me my uncle parked his 70 up on the hill to roat. So I will be paying him a visit in the next few days. I've tried buyin his truck since I was 15 so we'll see if he will finaly come off of it. It will get a 6.0/4l80 if I can get it.
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15!
okieraptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 03:14 PM   #4
Jim85IROC
Registered User
 
Jim85IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 502
Re: 427 or 6.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69BBsuburban View Post
I've driven BRAND NEW Corvettes, etc....
I still prefer the brute force and crudeness of my old jalopies....it's more than just the performance....there's a certain style and "coolness" factor no newer, plastic car can ever dublicate. Just my old school .02.....I'm an oddball
Brand new corvettes are a poor measuring stick unless they've had an aftermarket tune to eliminate the torque management. In bone stock form, those cars feel neutered.

Take a look on ls1tech at some of the dyno graphs of some of the modified 6.0s... they've got a torque curve that would embarrass some big blocks.
__________________
1987 GMC Sierra Classic 3500
454
TH400
My Sounddomain Page
Jim85IROC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 07:47 PM   #5
JEM
Ironmonger
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 127
Re: 427 or 6.0

Quote:
Originally Posted by menace121978 View Post
obviously i'd go with the new technology myself... i honestly believe that anyone who is voting for the old school big block hasnt had the opportunity to own or drive the new generation of muscle. i'll never go back
I'm kinda thinking that with a late-model aluminum 6.0 and some attention to component choice and location it might be possible to build a '66-72 that's not too far off 50/50 weight distribution.

Not only are the newer engines far lighter, the whole FEAD including alt, AC compressor, PS pump, etc. doesn't weigh a whole lot more than an old A6 AC compressor by itself, never mind bracketry, pulleys, etc.

Last edited by JEM; 05-19-2010 at 07:48 PM.
JEM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2010, 10:17 PM   #6
okieraptor
Registered User
 
okieraptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
Re: 427 or 6.0

Ok for those of you running the 6.0's. Heard a lot about 20mpg's. Really? I know a couple of guys with vmax's that are pullin the same mpg's as my titan, 15! How are guys gettin 20 out of them. I know they are detuned from the factory but that was the help fuel mileage not hurt it.
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15!
okieraptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com