![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: orangevale, ca
Posts: 3,626
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
![]() obviously i'd go with the new technology myself... i honestly believe that anyone who is voting for the old school big block hasnt had the opportunity to own or drive the new generation of muscle. i'll never go back ![]()
__________________
"Dennis the Menace" 1978 Silverado (2wd, 1/2 ton, short bed)complete nut & bolt frame off restomod LQ9/4L80E MY LS SWAP/FRAME OFF BUILD BOOK 2006 TBSS way too much to list ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Right in front of you.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roy, Wa
Posts: 584
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
Quote:
I still prefer the brute force and crudeness of my old jalopies....it's more than just the performance....there's a certain style and "coolness" factor no newer, plastic car can ever dublicate. Just my old school .02.....I'm an oddball ![]()
__________________
Pinstriping by Josh '78 Chevy Silverado SWB (lowered, 454) '90 Chevy Sport Truck '68 Dodge Charger R/T 1930 Ford Model A Last edited by 69BBsuburban; 05-19-2010 at 06:31 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
I agree the old just has that "coolness" to it. I forsee it as nothing less than a 496 when its all said and done. It will be just the cruzzer so load and lopy are deffenitly in the mix for it. I love the old skool but the way the new motors are proven them selves is making me like them A LOT!
On a side note my dad told me my uncle parked his 70 up on the hill to roat. So I will be paying him a visit in the next few days. I've tried buyin his truck since I was 15 so we'll see if he will finaly come off of it. It will get a 6.0/4l80 if I can get it.
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 502
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
Quote:
Take a look on ls1tech at some of the dyno graphs of some of the modified 6.0s... they've got a torque curve that would embarrass some big blocks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Ironmonger
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 127
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
Quote:
Not only are the newer engines far lighter, the whole FEAD including alt, AC compressor, PS pump, etc. doesn't weigh a whole lot more than an old A6 AC compressor by itself, never mind bracketry, pulleys, etc. Last edited by JEM; 05-19-2010 at 07:48 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: northern texas, southern oklahoma
Posts: 144
|
Re: 427 or 6.0
Ok for those of you running the 6.0's. Heard a lot about 20mpg's. Really? I know a couple of guys with vmax's that are pullin the same mpg's as my titan, 15! How are guys gettin 20 out of them. I know they are detuned from the factory but that was the help fuel mileage not hurt it.
__________________
82 chevy longbed(grey truck)first truck when i was 15! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|