05-30-2010, 02:37 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bakersfield, California
Posts: 88
|
Mustang II frontend
So, I am thinking of starting with a Mustang II complete front end kit. Weld on?? Or bolt on?? Would thid be a nice set up, and where would u guy's get this?? Thanks a Ton
|
05-30-2010, 03:30 PM | #2 |
Truck and auto performance nut
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
|
Re: Mustang II frontend
fatman, jim meyer racing, scotts hot rods, and a few others. what do you want to accomplish? laying frame or sports car handling?
__________________
Kurt - '68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy '72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close '06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD '18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver '95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto... my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken |
05-30-2010, 05:31 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
|
Re: Mustang II frontend
Yes, I would ask the same question: What is it that you are wanting to accomplish?
Keep in mind that these trucks have a perfectly good IFS that can be easily upgraded to PS, discs and bags using factory and/or aftermarket parts, and for less money and work than a M-II would entail. The one thing you won't get is R&P steering, so if you feel that R&P is a "must have", then maybe a M-II is the right choice for you. Ray Last edited by raycow; 05-30-2010 at 05:35 PM. |
05-30-2010, 09:10 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bakersfield, California
Posts: 88
|
Re: Mustang II frontend
Thanks for replying, I do not want it to sit way way low on the ground, just a nice stance. I guess I could just get the after market suspension parts for the front end I already have. Just thought and have heard to go with the m II frontend. Heard it is really nice and the r and p steering is a real plus. After I take it down to the frame, I figured the front end is a good place to start, then move to the rear. Good idea??
Thanks again |
05-31-2010, 08:53 AM | #5 |
I am a Referee of life.
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro N.C.
Posts: 13,992
|
Re: Mustang II frontend
dojo,if you really want the R&P you might want to look at the Porterbuilt front crossmember.It will have all the goodies and R&P,plus it's designed and built for the weight and size of a 1/2 ton truck.
__________________
The 47-present Chevrolet and GMC Truck Message Board Network,it's owners,moderators,members,and associates of any type should not be held responsible for my opinion. You can't fix stupid,not even with duct tape. "My appearance is due to the fact that "GOD" does punish you for having too much fun!" Barrett-Jackson has perfected alchemy,they make rust into gold! "You can lead a horse to water but you can't saddle a duck" "Cleverly disguised as a 'Responsible Adult' "Sometimes your Knight in shining armor is just a retard in tinfoil" |
05-31-2010, 01:46 PM | #6 |
Truck and auto performance nut
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: McKinney,Texas
Posts: 3,848
|
Re: Mustang II frontend
there's a member here with the stock crossmember and rack and pinion steering. I'm considering doing the same in my build...as long as I can be satisfied with the strength of the install.
__________________
Kurt - '68 GMC short step - NIB '09 LY6 6.0L crate motor w/mods, NIB '12 crate 4L85e w/billet 3k stall Circle D, 3.73 posi 12 bolt, DynaTech f-swap headers, 3/4 drop, handling mods, etc. - my toy '72 Chevy LWB C-10 Highlander - 350/350 ps/pb/tilt/ac - not original but close '06 Chevy TrailBlazerSS - LS2/4L70e - little black hot rod SUV - my DD '18 Kia Sorento - wife's econo-driver '95 Chevy S10 - reg cab shortbed, LS, 4.3, auto... my '68's powertrain and chassis build -links broken A surprise phase - carb to efi -links broken |
Bookmarks |
|
|