The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2010, 04:19 PM   #1
remist17
Registered User
 
remist17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 406
Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons

Hi all... I ogt a 87 stepside and I heard that the gas tanks being on the outside of the frame could be a issue. IS this why people do the gas tank swap to the rear? Is it really needed? I can not really afford a $400 fuel tank and all the work associated with it. Can I make do with the one side tank for now and then convert? Your opinions are welcome..... Ireally dont want to blow up !
__________________
2013 Chevy Silverado, Z71, 5.3L, 4 door
2005 Chevy Silverado, Z71, 5.3L, 4 door, 3.40

Support the Troops.
remist17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 04:25 PM   #2
STOCKISH
Formerly- 1972SuperCheyenne
 
STOCKISH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wake Forest NC
Posts: 5,782
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons

Side tanks have been proven to be no more dangerous than rear mounted tanks. Leave the side tanks and dont worry about it.
__________________
--Josh

My Build Thread:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=799218

A good crossthread is better than Loctite any day.

Life is not about what you have, but who you have to share it with.
STOCKISH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 04:33 PM   #3
GmtGmt
Conversion Truck Addicted
 
GmtGmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 1,551
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972SuperCheyenne View Post
Side tanks have been proven to be no more dangerous than rear mounted tanks. Leave the side tanks and dont worry about it.
X2 and the channel that showed that they really would blow up was Fake there was put rocket boosters in the tank to make them explode right before impact
__________________
Thomas

Quote:
Tonight mine pulled a few cars out of snowbanks, and is sitting in my driveway, icicles on the grille, wheels just white cakes of snow, buried up to the lug nuts in powder, straps and chains wrapped around the bumpers, the outline of the wipers clear in 4 inches of snow on the windshield... A tired warrior of the 1980s in a world of low profile tires, front wheel drive, and plastic bumpers, where people stay in their houses until snowplows move the offending substance from their paths, too helpless to travel without AAA and chains and salt, clearing their windows with longhandled brushes while gently stepping around in the snow trying to stay nice and dry.
GmtGmt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 05:35 PM   #4
RandyP
Getting Old; Going Broke
 
RandyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Owasso OK
Posts: 2,764
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons

Quote:
Originally Posted by GmtGmt View Post
X2 and the channel that showed that they really would blow up was Fake there was put rocket boosters in the tank to make them explode right before impact
If you put a few 1/4 sticks of dynamite beside it, those saddle tanks WILL BLOW UP! Be very careful if you do this, dangerous tanks...
RandyP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2010, 08:14 PM   #5
D13
Registered User
 
D13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Memphis MI
Posts: 1,851
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons

Guys put the blazer tanks in the rear for other reasons. Like suspensions that want that space. Or weight further back for racing. Or to allow the bed side to be smooth. From a driving standpoint the tanks are safe right where they are.
__________________
1987 2 ton
1982 250/TH350 beater in progress
Dad's 1981 3/4 L6 3 on tree posi and no options, awaiting restoration or scrapping
Plus a mess o' tractors
D13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2010, 01:12 AM   #6
78 Big10 454
78 Big10 454
 
78 Big10 454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Posts: 839
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons

The only reason I changed to a rear-mounted tank was due to having a single 16.5 gallon saddle tank feeding a 454. I couldn't drive across L.A. without refueling. If I had a factory dual saddle tank set-up, I would have left well enough alone.
78 Big10 454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2010, 02:26 PM   #7
remist17
Registered User
 
remist17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 406
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons

as always thanks you saved me some cash !! Maybe down the road I will think about it. why waste $500 if i dont have to.
__________________
2013 Chevy Silverado, Z71, 5.3L, 4 door
2005 Chevy Silverado, Z71, 5.3L, 4 door, 3.40

Support the Troops.
remist17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com