Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-09-2010, 04:19 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 406
|
Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons
Hi all... I ogt a 87 stepside and I heard that the gas tanks being on the outside of the frame could be a issue. IS this why people do the gas tank swap to the rear? Is it really needed? I can not really afford a $400 fuel tank and all the work associated with it. Can I make do with the one side tank for now and then convert? Your opinions are welcome..... Ireally dont want to blow up !
__________________
2013 Chevy Silverado, Z71, 5.3L, 4 door 2005 Chevy Silverado, Z71, 5.3L, 4 door, 3.40 Support the Troops. |
06-09-2010, 04:25 PM | #2 |
Formerly- 1972SuperCheyenne
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wake Forest NC
Posts: 5,782
|
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons
Side tanks have been proven to be no more dangerous than rear mounted tanks. Leave the side tanks and dont worry about it.
__________________
--Josh My Build Thread:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=799218 A good crossthread is better than Loctite any day. Life is not about what you have, but who you have to share it with. |
06-09-2010, 04:33 PM | #3 | |
Conversion Truck Addicted
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 1,551
|
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons
X2 and the channel that showed that they really would blow up was Fake there was put rocket boosters in the tank to make them explode right before impact
__________________
Thomas Quote:
|
|
06-09-2010, 05:35 PM | #4 |
Getting Old; Going Broke
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Owasso OK
Posts: 2,764
|
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons
If you put a few 1/4 sticks of dynamite beside it, those saddle tanks WILL BLOW UP! Be very careful if you do this, dangerous tanks...
|
06-09-2010, 08:14 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Memphis MI
Posts: 1,851
|
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons
Guys put the blazer tanks in the rear for other reasons. Like suspensions that want that space. Or weight further back for racing. Or to allow the bed side to be smooth. From a driving standpoint the tanks are safe right where they are.
__________________
1987 2 ton 1982 250/TH350 beater in progress Dad's 1981 3/4 L6 3 on tree posi and no options, awaiting restoration or scrapping Plus a mess o' tractors |
06-10-2010, 01:12 AM | #6 |
78 Big10 454
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pismo Beach, CA
Posts: 839
|
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons
The only reason I changed to a rear-mounted tank was due to having a single 16.5 gallon saddle tank feeding a 454. I couldn't drive across L.A. without refueling. If I had a factory dual saddle tank set-up, I would have left well enough alone.
|
06-10-2010, 02:26 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 406
|
Re: Fuel Tank Swap VS Stock tank Quesitons
as always thanks you saved me some cash !! Maybe down the road I will think about it. why waste $500 if i dont have to.
__________________
2013 Chevy Silverado, Z71, 5.3L, 4 door 2005 Chevy Silverado, Z71, 5.3L, 4 door, 3.40 Support the Troops. |
Bookmarks |
|
|