The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Racing and high performance (trucks haulin more than hay)

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2010, 06:09 PM   #1
regan wilson
Senior Member
 
regan wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: tyler texas
Posts: 1,557
Re: rack and pinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by midevil1 View Post
Turning radius is better than stock.
I have Mustang 2 type rack on mine and fabbed the rest . My turn radius is way more (wider) than stock but , It drives down the racetrack like a Caddy.
__________________
NHRA Super Street 469C
It only runs 10.90 at 156 mph

I was Dragtruck when Dragtruck wasn't Cool!
regan wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 11:06 PM   #2
C20-67_N_MO
Champagne Taste on Beer Budget
 
C20-67_N_MO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: High Ridge, Missouri
Posts: 2,190
Re: rack and pinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by regan wilson View Post
I have Mustang 2 type rack on mine and fabbed the rest . My turn radius is way more (wider) than stock but , It drives down the racetrack like a Caddy.
Yeah once I get my truck to this point I will have a rack on my truck.

Just seems the way to go.

Now I need to save up for this and my dream motor SBC 434!
__________________
Coming Soon: Project 1970 Country Truck
C20-67_N_MO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 09:05 AM   #3
kpeztruck
Registered User
 
kpeztruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 229
Re: rack and pinion

Quote:
Originally Posted by regan wilson View Post
I have Mustang 2 type rack on mine and fabbed the rest . My turn radius is way more (wider) than stock but , It drives down the racetrack like a Caddy.
I have to agree with Regan on this one. The turning radius was a good bit wider, but goes down track very well. I had fabricated another crossmember in front of the front suspension crossmember, due to my engine sitting low in the chassis. Finding the correct rack location for proper bump steer was time consuming. I tried the bump steer kits, and got scared of the size spacer required. As a result I spent more time moving and trying bump steer measurements until I was happy.
The new front suspension uses the same Mustang II rack and has less than an 1/8" of bump steer. It is just taking too long to come to market with the suspension. Paul Baxter
kpeztruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com