The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2011, 01:40 PM   #26
Heater63
Registered User
 
Heater63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N Texas
Posts: 580
Re: need help with shocks????

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich 5150 69 View Post
At the same token we build street rods with 18 to 23 degrees of shock angle for better axle control......so I`m thinking if your close to being in line with axle travel angles your still good.
I used ECC's relocator kit ($60), with 4" drop coils. I measured around 20 degrees inclination both longitudinally and transversely, but that was just using my iPhone bubble level LOL.

Here's pics installed
Attached Images
  
__________________
292 + TKO500
Heater63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 04:23 PM   #27
javadoc
Hey Watch this...
 
javadoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Parker, CO
Posts: 414
Re: need help with shocks????

So, the shock relocation kits are just a bolt-in solution? I'm asking because I don't (yet) have a welding set up.
__________________
What have I gotten myself into now?
1964 Chevy Stepside - 383 hydraulic roller Vortec ... a work in progress
2000 Volvo V70R - 340awhp, 22psi, meth-injected of Porsche-eating fun. The grocery-getter on steroids
javadoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 05:19 PM   #28
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,977
Re: need help with shocks????

Quote:
Originally Posted by javadoc View Post
So, the shock relocation kits are just a bolt-in solution? I'm asking because I don't (yet) have a welding set up.
Yes. Shock relocation 'kits' bolt in where the factory shock mounts are. They simply alter the angles slightly @ the lower heights & add back some of the travel stroke.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 06:43 PM   #29
lakeroadster
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: High Plains of Colorado
Posts: 2,485
Re: need help with shocks????

Quote:
Originally Posted by vin63 View Post
You can go the Monroe Monro-Matic Plus route:

Fronts: 33033 Rears: 31000
I was out in the shop today and did some measuring. If you have removed the stock rear snubbers, and you have 5" lowering springs (see original post) the 31000 Monroe shocks will bottom out before the rear axle tube contacts the frame. That is not good.

Same kind of story for the front on my truck, the Monroe 33033's will bottom out.


Monroe pdf with shock dim's can be found here: Monroe Shock Mounting Length Sheets
Monroe-Matic (Rear) P/N 31000 Collapsed Length = 12.000"
Monroe-Matic (Front) P/N 33033 Collapsed Length = 10.125"
Here are my measurements (shock mounts are all stock and have not been altered. Stock snubbers have been removed and replaced with custom snubbers) You should compare these measurements to your specific application. :

Edit 02-06-2011: Modified upper shock mount (see post #56 of my build thread). Dimensions shown in red below are shock dim's. with the modified upper mounts.
Rear: I have 5” CPP lowering springs on the rear. All shock dim’s are from eye to eye:
Rear Axle Hanging Free, Tires off the ground: Shock Length = 17-1/2” ---- 16-1/2"
Ride Height, Shock Length = 15-1/2” --- 14-1/4"
Rear axle Bottomed Out on Custom Snubber: Shock Length = 12” --- 11-3/4"
Rear axle Tube Bottomed Out against Frame: Shock Length = 11-1/4” --- 10-1/2"
2-1/2” Suspension Travel Before Contacting Custom Snubber
3-3/4” Suspension Travel Before Axle Tube Contacts Frame (No Snubber)

Shocks: Monro-Matic Plus P/N 32207: 17.875" Extended, 11.250" Collapsed
Front: Previous Owner heated the stock coil springs. All dim’s are from eye to eye:
Front Suspension Hanging Free, Tires off the ground: Shock Length = 14”
Ride Height, Shock Length = 11-1/4”
Lower Control Arm Bottomed Out on Custom Snubber: Shock Length = 9”
Lower Control Arm Bottomed Out, No Snubber = 7”
2” Suspension Travel Before Contacting Snubber
4” Suspension Travel with no Snubber

Shocks: Monroe Gas Magnum RV P/N 555002: 12.750" Extended, 8.625" Collapsed
Edit: 01-24-2011:

Here is a reply I received from a Monroe Web Inquiry in regards to my choices above:
John,

The shock you selected for the rear, 32207, would appear to be close as far as the dampening goes. It is used on old 1/2 ton trucks from Ford and Dodge, so it seems the dampening would be similar. The RV shock you have discovered is a retrofit shock for trailers. The dampening characteristics are similar to the original shock. These will probably work out okay, but I can't really give a solid guarantee on these based on all the modifications.

Thank you for your interest in our products.

Monroe Team Member,

Andy
Also: here is another reply from a Monroe Web Inquiry in regards to Monro-Matic shock installation angles, in the stock positions, mine are 40 degrees off vertical:

Thank you for contacting Tenneco Automotive.

The shocks would not function properly if they were mounted more than 30 degrees off from 90. With them being 40 degrees off, they may tend to have lapses in dampening.

Thank you for your interest in our products.

Monroe Team Member,

Andy

Last edited by lakeroadster; 04-19-2011 at 10:01 AM.
lakeroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 08:46 PM   #30
Heater63
Registered User
 
Heater63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N Texas
Posts: 580
Re: need help with shocks????

Damn it's good to have an Engineer on the 60-66 board!

Thanks lakeroadster for all your expertise and help in getting the facts.
I just took Early Classics advice when they recommended the special shocks And relocators for my static rear 4" drop.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
292 + TKO500

Last edited by Heater63; 01-22-2011 at 08:47 PM.
Heater63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 09:10 PM   #31
jimmydean
Registered User
 
jimmydean's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 3,728
Re: need help with shocks????

I'll put my fronts on when i get home and hope to not bounce down the road.
__________________
New Project: 1966 LWB C20
Plans:
1/2 ton conversion
Dropmember front
Dropmember rear
Corvette discs
Restored raised bed

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=4295210
jimmydean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 09:16 PM   #32
65Gregg
Registered User
 
65Gregg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Willis, Texas
Posts: 754
Re: need help with shocks????

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich 5150 69 View Post
At the same token we build street rods with 18 to 23 degrees of shock angle for better axle control......so I`m thinking if your close to being in line with axle travel angles your still good.
The top of the shocks on these trucks are canted toward the front of the truck, you're correct in what you are saying about your placement being in line with the axle travel angle.
__________________
65Gregg

Blue long bed
White TBSS
61 Impala
“The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why.” Mark Twain
65Gregg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2011, 09:37 PM   #33
lakeroadster
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: High Plains of Colorado
Posts: 2,485
Re: need help with shocks????

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
Yes. Shock relocation 'kits' bolt in where the factory shock mounts are. They simply alter the angles slightly @ the lower heights & add back some of the travel stroke.
Scoti and Heater63,

What angle are your rear shocks at now that you reworked the upper mounts?

I am planning to rework my upper mounts such that they are less than 30 degrees off vertical, per the Monroe reply shown in post 29 above.

Thanks,

John

Last edited by lakeroadster; 01-24-2011 at 09:39 PM.
lakeroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2011, 10:33 PM   #34
Heater63
Registered User
 
Heater63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: N Texas
Posts: 580
Re: need help with shocks????

John, you must have missed this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heater63 View Post
I used ECC's relocator kit ($60), with 4" drop coils. I measured around 20 degrees inclination both longitudinally and transversely, but that was just using my iPhone bubble level LOL.

Here's pics installed
about 20 degrees
__________________
292 + TKO500
Heater63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 01:25 AM   #35
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,977
Re: need help with shocks????

My angle came to 57° (so 33° from 90). I have always heard less than 35° to keep the shocks efficiency of rebound.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 09:56 AM   #36
lakeroadster
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: High Plains of Colorado
Posts: 2,485
Re: need help with shocks????

In order to bring the shocks more vertical I plan to build a simple upper mount out of 2" tubing. This mount will bolt to the existing upper mount holes once the rivets are removed. I ran FEA and the stock crossmember is up to the task in regards to handling the bending moment.

Anybody see any reason why this wouldn't work?

Edit 02-06-2011: Fabricated upper shock mounts and they worked great! Full "how to" write up can be found here: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=451200.


Last edited by lakeroadster; 03-06-2011 at 03:44 PM.
lakeroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 10:11 AM   #37
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,977
Re: need help with shocks????

You'll have clearance so you should be good.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com