The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1988 - 1998 GMT400 Chevy & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2011, 10:35 PM   #1
iluvmy72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
350 or 454?....the milage question....

OK I FINALLY got the wife to stay away from the mini-van thing. Now we have this cinario shaping up and I am not quite sure on everything....Have 2 suburbans....one is a 96 1/2 ton....another is a 94 3/4 ton with a 7.4 that needs a top end rebuild....we got the 96 to replace the 94 in order to put in a gas saver engine in the 5.7 vortec as compared to the 454 in the 94. Well I trashed the 96 in a wreck but the engine is still good. I could put it in the 94 and go from there(yes I know that is a wireing beast of a job), put in a TBI 350 with Vortec heads from the 96 5.7 motor, keep the 454 stock, or put vortec heads from a vortec 454 motor onto the current TBI.

What would my real gas savings be between all of this?
iluvmy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2011, 08:26 AM   #2
mbgmike
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena,Tx /Pto Pta DR
Posts: 5,415
Re: 350 or 454?....the milage question....

Quote:
Originally Posted by iluvmy72 View Post
OK I FINALLY got the wife to stay away from the mini-van thing. Now we have this cinario shaping up and I am not quite sure on everything....Have 2 suburbans....one is a 96 1/2 ton....another is a 94 3/4 ton with a 7.4 that needs a top end rebuild....we got the 96 to replace the 94 in order to put in a gas saver engine in the 5.7 vortec as compared to the 454 in the 94. Well I trashed the 96 in a wreck but the engine is still good. I could put it in the 94 and go from there(yes I know that is a wireing beast of a job), put in a TBI 350 with Vortec heads from the 96 5.7 motor, keep the 454 stock, or put vortec heads from a vortec 454 motor onto the current TBI.

What would my real gas savings be between all of this?
can't help on the big block,but i get right at 16 mpg on mine(350)
mbgmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2011, 09:51 AM   #3
Boog
laying low
 
Boog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Searcy, Ark. USA
Posts: 14,116
Re: 350 or 454?....the milage question....

I don't see the return for the amount of headache and work you'll put in doing this swap. I might suggest repairing the 7.4 and keep going or sell both trucks and buy a newer one with 5.3 and 3.73 gears. It's a good combo.
__________________
Boog
69 Chevy stepside, 358/T350, 4.11 posi, 4.5/4 drop, rallys, poboy driver 'primer is finer'
Tahoe, Yukon & GMC Crewcab All GM..'nuff said.

I stand for the flag and kneel at the cross
Boog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2011, 10:40 AM   #4
iluvmy72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
Re: 350 or 454?....the milage question....

NO WAY!!! the 94 has been our baby.....here is the reality....I own the 94. I can't afford a newer one with a 5.3. However I can always do that swap later and the 94 already has the 3.73 ratio. But I gotta also be honest here as well. I very much dislike the 2000-2006 body style including the stying of the interior. The interior also feels smaller. The seats don't seem to be as "plush". But then again I liked the styling of the 73-91 the best. Just hated the front bench seats. I love how open the front dash area is on the 94. Plus here in Utah you need 4WD. Push button 4WD was never my favorite setup. And most parts on the 94 are cheaper to repair compared to the newer ones. Example: fuel pump.
iluvmy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2011, 03:48 PM   #5
Hoods69BadBowTie
Chevys Kick A$$
 
Hoods69BadBowTie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Zootown, MT
Posts: 12,699
Re: 350 or 454?....the milage question....

I would dump the 454 and just put a 350 in there or if you really want to keep the 454 do the vortech heads swap. Don't think your going to do much with mileage on the swap. If you really felt like doing the wiring swap you could do it. If it was me I would just do a TBI 350 swap sum heads and intake on but thats just me.
__________________
*HOODS is what I answer too*
-'79, '77, '88 Pickup Sold, '85 Camaro, '83 T/A, '81,'83,'90 K5 Blazer All Sold
-'79 3/4 ton "Big Yellow Bananna" Lifted 4spd. 39.5 TSL Swampers, The money Pit
-'86 K5 Blazer Silverado 6.2 4" lift 35"s
-'95 Ext. Cab Shorty 4" Tuff Country rolling 35" M/T's
-'83 Monte Carlo T-Tops. 126,500 Original Miles
-LATER
I would rather push a Chevy then drive a ford!!
Hoods69BadBowTie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2011, 05:50 PM   #6
iluvmy72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
Re: 350 or 454?....the milage question....

well on that same note, I'm wondering if I can take that same 5.7 from the 96 and put it into the 94 with a tbi setup controlling it. But I have never tried it. However it would get rid of the stupid poppet valve thing and plastic intake.
iluvmy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2011, 06:36 PM   #7
texasfunk
Registered User
 
texasfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 1,671
Re: 350 or 454?....the milage question....

Quote:
Originally Posted by iluvmy72 View Post
NO WAY!!! the 94 has been our baby.....here is the reality....I own the 94. I can't afford a newer one with a 5.3. However I can always do that swap later and the 94 already has the 3.73 ratio. But I gotta also be honest here as well. I very much dislike the 2000-2006 body style including the stying of the interior. The interior also feels smaller. The seats don't seem to be as "plush". But then again I liked the styling of the 73-91 the best. Just hated the front bench seats. I love how open the front dash area is on the 94. Plus here in Utah you need 4WD. Push button 4WD was never my favorite setup. And most parts on the 94 are cheaper to repair compared to the newer ones. Example: fuel pump.
Mu old 99 tahoe had the 5.3 and it was lbs. I loved it.
Posted via Mobile Device
texasfunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com