The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-14-2011, 09:23 PM   #1
1968SWBBigBlock
Active Member
 
1968SWBBigBlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,643
68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

Does anyone know what drums to buy to convert the rearend over to 5 lugs a 4.75" bolt circle on the rear drums?
__________________
1968 SWB
454 + .040, 490HP x 540 FT pounds of Torque 10-1 Kb Forged pistons, recon rods w/ ARP wave loc bolts
781 heads Ported with 2.19/1.88 SSTvalves
Lunati 60204 cam, Micro Trol lifters,
Ported Edelbrock Performer Rpm manifold armor coated, Pertronix Triple Strike Ignition
Holley 770 Street Avenger carb,Headers armor coated
Built by Watson Ruppel Performance in Sarahsville Ohio.
Hardshift Tranny Built Turbo 350,TSI 10" 3000 stall
12 Bolt Eaton Posi 4.10 Richmond Gears moser axles
18.5" x 31" Hoosier Pro Street Radials
ET Classic 5 Wheels - polished
Power Steering, Power Brakes,Disc Brakes,Tach & Gauge Dash, Tilt,Factory Air (gone)
Custom Paint & Body Work

Special thanks to my wife, my son and my money tree
1968SWBBigBlock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2011, 10:56 PM   #2
danman987123
Registered User
 
danman987123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 127
Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

i just bought a rearend from a 97 camaro z28.....cut all the brackets off of it that go on the camaro...then i got two new axle seats which u can make or buy and tada.....i spend 250 on a rearend from a 97 z28 that had 40k miles...i now have 4wheels disc brakes and a posi trac rearend....by the way it goes right in no problems at all even the width is perfect...just trying to send another option ur way.....plus 4wheels disc looks cool and better stopping power than a drum....and i dont think 250 was bad....just shop around at ur local junkyard...good luck though whichever u choose to go
danman987123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2011, 12:24 AM   #3
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,403
Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1968SWBBigBlock View Post
Does anyone know what drums to buy to convert the rearend over to 5 lugs a 4.75" bolt circle on the rear drums?
I would look into late 60's, to early 70's Impala. They use the big drum & same outer bearing as the truck .
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2011, 12:56 AM   #4
1970 CST STEP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bandera, TX
Posts: 85
Talking Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by danman987123 View Post
i just bought a rearend from a 97 camaro z28.....cut all the brackets off of it that go on the camaro...then i got two new axle seats which u can make or buy and tada.....i spend 250 on a rearend from a 97 z28 that had 40k miles...i now have 4wheels disc brakes and a posi trac rearend....by the way it goes right in no problems at all even the width is perfect...just trying to send another option ur way.....plus 4wheels disc looks cool and better stopping power than a drum....and i dont think 250 was bad....just shop around at ur local junkyard...good luck though whichever u choose to go
4 wheel does look cool, but it does NOT stop better than drum! The drum has more "swept" area than disc. Not trying to argue or start an argument, just callin it the way it is..........
__________________
1967 SWB (small window) original
1970 4x4 STEP
1970 CST SWB FLEET
1972 SWB FLEET ORIGINAL
1970 CST STEP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2011, 01:22 AM   #5
TrkEnvy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 264
Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1970 CST STEP View Post
4 wheel does look cool, but it does NOT stop better than drum! The drum has more "swept" area than disc. Not trying to argue or start an argument, just callin it the way it is..........
If drums stop better why dont they use them in racing instead of discs?? I cant fathom drums stopping better than a disc brake setup..
TrkEnvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2011, 01:32 AM   #6
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,403
Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

I drive an 02 silverato 1500 (DD), with 4w disc....on a hard stop, I think the 69 Longhorn has it , hands down. The longhorn is a manual ,disc front/drum rear. The biggest thing I saw with drums, was that if you got em hot, they would "fade'... crazyL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2011, 05:37 AM   #7
bo-w
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: sacramento Ca
Posts: 84
Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrkEnvy View Post
If drums stop better why dont they use them in racing instead of discs?? I cant fathom drums stopping better than a disc brake setup..
if disk brakes stop better then why dont you see them on Big rigs? the surface contact area between a shoe and a drum is much larger than between a pad and its disk. im not saying drums are better, they are way more prone to "fade" and are heavier than disks. just my .02
bo-w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2011, 09:57 AM   #8
jorgensensc
Registered User
 
jorgensensc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cypress, Tx
Posts: 4,005
Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

The vans for a short while in the early 70's had 5 on 4 3/4. I also learned through some research that the front dorms on a 1956 belair were the same and would work. Belair guys will give them away when doing a front disc conversion, which most do. My whole truck is setup to run dual bolt pattern. I have both 5 on 5 and 5 on 4 3/4 bolt patterns on it. Currently running the 5 on 5.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
1972 C20 Suburban- Big Blue Betty
'56 Chevy Bel Air Sedan- Frame up Restoration

-What would you attempt to achieve if you knew you could not fail?-

-I Refuse To Tiptoe Through Life, Only To Arrive Safely At Death's Door-

R.I.P. EAST SIDE LOW LIFE
jorgensensc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2011, 12:40 PM   #9
ProStreet68SB
The Engine Whisperer
 
ProStreet68SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 770
Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by bo-w View Post
if disk brakes stop better then why dont you see them on Big rigs? the surface contact area between a shoe and a drum is much larger than between a pad and its disk. im not saying drums are better, they are way more prone to "fade" and are heavier than disks. just my .02
Discs > drums. And to answer your question, some of the newer big rigs are coming with disc brakes. So thanks for playing, come and try again sometime.
__________________
-Automatics win races, 6-speeds impress high school kids
-Save a tree, support your local dragstrip.
-"Failure - The Secret To Success, the idea is that you can fail 100 times as long as you can succeed once" -Takeo Fukui
columbuscarsandcoffee.net and on Facebook
ProStreet68SB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2011, 11:24 PM   #10
cleanfreak
Registered User
 
cleanfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: port robinson ontario canada
Posts: 398
Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

crazylonghorn nailed it. I have 1965 impala 11" drums on my 68 , machined axles to fit center hole and had bolt patern re-drilled- perfect fit
cleanfreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2011, 10:31 PM   #11
danman987123
Registered User
 
danman987123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 127
Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

not starting argument either with anyone....i know ur right about drums having a bigger surface to stop with....but a caliper in good working condition would be better just due to the amount of force the caliper has to clamp on a rotor and slow the car/truck down quicker.....
danman987123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2011, 10:44 PM   #12
JDL
Senior Member
 
JDL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Agency IA.
Posts: 1,839
Re: 68 rearend - 5 x 4.75 conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by bo-w View Post
if disk brakes stop better then why dont you see them on Big rigs? the surface contact area between a shoe and a drum is much larger than between a pad and its disk. im not saying drums are better, they are way more prone to "fade" and are heavier than disks. just my .02

Most semi truck air brake systems utilize drum brakes, including S-cam systems. Although disc brakes are more efficient, drum brakes are an older technology that is more common in semis due to their lower cost. Drum brakes do not dissipate heat evenly and cause more wear on braking systems than disc brakes

Read more: Types of Air Brake Systems on Semis | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/list_7591185_typ...#ixzz1MZdpITzU
__________________
72 Chevy short step side with 454 air and tilt.
72 nova project car
63 chevy II drag car
Agency Iowa
JDL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com