Edited by staff - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

domeier · 10-03-2011, 11:23 AM

Please note that you must be a supporting member to post classified items. This includes but is not limited to What Its Worth, Want To Buy, Want To Trade, and For Sale. Please consider supporting the forum by subscribing. Further information on the subscription levels available are located here

If you need any further assistance with that please contact any Admin for help.

Anyway, just thinking out loud, I suppose. Anyone interested?

ChevLoRay · 10-03-2011, 12:17 PM

Interesting....

I'm gonna play devil's advocate and suggest that you're not going to see any real (worthwhile) improvement in fuel economy. Your vehicle weight isn't going to change (decrease) more than 100-lbs, meaning you'll have less torque to get that mass moving. That means you're gonna get into the engine more to accomplish the same feat, compared to what you have.

I'd love to have more engine than I have, but what I have (350) is adequate for what I do. My '96 GMC has a 4.3/4L60E. I get around 17MPG on average. I recall my late brother-in-law complaining that his 250 6-cyl got between 8 and 10MPG. It may be worthwhile to consider a 4.3....just for the sake of the idea. I know it wouldn't be original, but it may be worthwhile.

Still, there's no replacement for displacement.

GASoline71 · 10-03-2011, 12:31 PM

I'm gonna second that first statement that Ray made. I had a 292 in a '67 C10 I had eons ago. Swapped it for a 350 and probably gained 2 to 3mpg. More cubes and more cylinders makes more power... takes less work for the engine to get the truck moving. But it wasn't a drastic change.

Using an old truck as a DD has it's pitfalls... MPG is one of them. Regardless of the engine you use.

Gary

10-03-2011, 11:23 AM	#1
domeier Registered User Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: San Jose, California Posts: 784	Edited by staff Please note that you must be a supporting member to post classified items. This includes but is not limited to What Its Worth, Want To Buy, Want To Trade, and For Sale. Please consider supporting the forum by subscribing. Further information on the subscription levels available are located here If you need any further assistance with that please contact any Admin for help. Anyway, just thinking out loud, I suppose. Anyone interested? Last edited by gcburdic; 10-03-2011 at 12:52 PM. Reason: WTT by non-sub

10-03-2011, 12:17 PM	#2
ChevLoRay Old Skool Club Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas" Posts: 10,880	Re: Who has a 6? Who wants a HO 350? Interesting.... I'm gonna play devil's advocate and suggest that you're not going to see any real (worthwhile) improvement in fuel economy. Your vehicle weight isn't going to change (decrease) more than 100-lbs, meaning you'll have less torque to get that mass moving. That means you're gonna get into the engine more to accomplish the same feat, compared to what you have. I'd love to have more engine than I have, but what I have (350) is adequate for what I do. My '96 GMC has a 4.3/4L60E. I get around 17MPG on average. I recall my late brother-in-law complaining that his 250 6-cyl got between 8 and 10MPG. It may be worthwhile to consider a 4.3....just for the sake of the idea. I know it wouldn't be original, but it may be worthwhile. Still, there's no replacement for displacement. __________________ Member Nr. 2770 '96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed. '69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo The older I get, the better I was.



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.