The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2011, 12:53 PM   #1
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
Re: higher MPG

K&N is great for wearing down your bearings and cylinder walls due to the added dirt going into the engine.
Tornados have been proven to do nothing but drain your wallet.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 01:09 PM   #2
longbed67
Registered User
 
longbed67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monroe, WI
Posts: 1,415
Re: higher MPG

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn Man View Post
K&N is great for wearing down your bearings and cylinder walls due to the added dirt going into the engine.
Tornados have been proven to do nothing but drain your wallet.
Couldn't agree more if you dont believe look up some peer reviewed research studies on it!

A good Tune Up the engine for sure using a wideband setup and monitor and depending on how much you romped on the engine when you drove it maybe complete a rebuild... I would definitely go with a stock 3.07 gear ratio or a 3.08 Richmond ring and pinion, and around a 30"to 31" tall tire in the rear even with a final drive of 1:1 on the tranny that will still get you down to some nice cruizing rpm's if you want to play around with different combinations go to
www.12bolt.com and go to the gearing calculator it is an easy to use excel file and allows you to put different tire sizes transmission and rear axle combinations and gives you a spreadsheet of everything you need to know. it is by far the easiest and best gearing calc I have ever used.
__________________
Adam

My 1967 C10 - Turbo 250 Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=485843

(608) 214-8706
longbed67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 01:17 PM   #3
oldgold70c10
Who's got steelies?
 
oldgold70c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, Oklahoma
Posts: 1,025
Re: higher MPG

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn Man View Post
K&N is great for wearing down your bearings and cylinder walls due to the added dirt going into the engine.
Tornados have been proven to do nothing but drain your wallet.
Can you elaborate?
__________________
1969 C10 LWB W/ 250 I6 & 3spd
1970 C10 with '67 small window cab, 68 front end, blue; 305/TH350, 3.08 limited slip rear end, manual brakes, power steering; & 4-wheel drums-My daily driver.
1975 Chevelle Malibu Classic Coupe 350/th350 mint green
1970 C20 Suburban 350/700R4 4.10 gearing green & white
1978 Big 10 Silverado 350/th350, working ac, 2 tone blue-My summer daily driver
1983 GMC 1500 Sierra 305/SM465 2.73 rear end

How to add a trip odometer to your 67-72 stock speedometer

How to rebuild your Q-Jet

My Truck Page
My Youtube Channel
oldgold70c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 01:29 PM   #4
longbed67
Registered User
 
longbed67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monroe, WI
Posts: 1,415
Re: higher MPG

For those who wont go look it up here is the jist of it....

K&N Filters get their increased air flow through increasing the micron filter size of the material and when you look on a lock box setup using a K&N vs even a standard paper or Foam Filter the K&N yes flows more, but on the same note also allows more dirt to flow through, to the point that after a couple of hours of testing one can visually see dirt building up in the box. My friends dad works for a company that independently tested just about every filter type imaginable for use in their machinery just to see what was going to best protect the machinery at their facility cost aside the k&n allow the most dirt to get in and the oiled foam protected the best. That said the oiled foam was also the most restrictive, but not by much.

The tornado thing in actual dyno tests not done by that company has shown to decrease HP and when looking at total cfm of flow through a pipe has shown huge restriction in the amount of air allowed to pass through the pipe in the same time under the same conditions, the whole disturb the air and funnel it down in faster is a scheme that is catchy and sounds good to the buyer but doesnt actually work in real life. It is kind of like the concept of a cool looking fishing lure that catch's the fishermans eye but would never catch a fish.
__________________
Adam

My 1967 C10 - Turbo 250 Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=485843

(608) 214-8706
longbed67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 08:13 PM   #5
bucktruck68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: concord, NC
Posts: 51
Re: higher MPG

Thanks to all for the info. Funny how one discussion branches off into other topics. Which is very good. I have several things to think about but I have a good idea of the direction to go. I have some time before it arrives here but never to early to start the process. I'll keep you posted and hopefully post pics when i get it going.
bucktruck68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 08:30 PM   #6
WorkinLonghorn
Senior Member
 
WorkinLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Studio City, Calif.
Posts: 2,887
Re: higher MPG

If your mileage is that crappy with Normal Driving you know, not racing every car off of every stop or light, but just putting around, then before you spend a penny try cupping your hand over the end of the exhaust pipe and see if it is a steady vibration with occasional bigger puffs or if there is a regular big pulse that may indicate a miss. If you find a miss then you can hook up a tach or just pay close attention as you remove and replace spark wires one at a time and determine which cylinder is not contributing (RPMs don't go down when that plug wire is disconnected).
Post here if this is the case. If you have or can borrow a compression tester then check and write down the compression for each cylinder with all the plugs removed and the throttle wide open, cranking with a reasonably good battery.post results here.
__________________
'69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme.
WorkinLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2011, 01:25 PM   #7
68gmsee
Active Member
 
68gmsee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Centrally located between Houston, Austin and Waco. BCS area.
Posts: 7,947
Re: higher MPG

Welcome to the site... All good responses above.

My experience with these old trucks that I've been driving since I turned 15 in 1958 is that you're not going to get very good gas mileage out of them. Yes, you can go from 9 to 12, 13 maybe 15 mpg with a tune up, rebuilding the engine or changing rear ends and transmission but that's still bad when gas is $3-$4 a gallon. For a youngster that means having to spend quite a bit of money just to go to school unless you live couple of miles from the school. My nephew found that out real quick. His part time work money was going strictly for gas.

You could modernize it to the new computer controlled engines and that would help or you could leave the truck the way your dad bought it so that the younger generation can experience what we old folks had to go through .
68gmsee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com