![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,047
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
They get around 10% - 15% better fuel economy than a conventional small block. They're great engines and all, but they're not magic. They just do a better job of getting fuel and air into the engine than the older stuff. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
Unfortunately I don't have the patience to work through issues like that, I prefer the bolt in aspect even if it is a little pricier. Quote:
For my '87 crew (TBI) the engine is very tired (166k); it shows about 40psi at start up, but is around 0 after I get it warmed up. I am sure the gauge is off or it would be making some serious noise, but it smokes on start up (blue) and I think I can see blue smoke when I get on it. The 3.73's with a T400 and 275/60-15's aren't helping either when I insist on going 70mph on the freeway. I have a low mile 350 in my garage and I had planned on putting that engine in my '87 with a EGR Edelbrock Performer manifold with a TBI adapter. If the Vortec heads are that much better it might be worth the work you described above? Quote:
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: houston,texas
Posts: 58
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Well i cant tell you about your oil problem but ive seen it done on a tbi truck with a performer for vortec heads. It worked and made decent power. They used the used a spacer. No need for the gmpp
Also therebare ls setups that do get 23+mpg. They generally are not lifted but they do exist. My truck weighs 3990 with the sbc iron heads and iron intake. The ls is a hare lighter with the plastic intake and aluminum heads. I expect at least 20mpg Posted via Mobile Device |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 6,370
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
My 85 5.3L 3/4 ton Suburban gets 17-19MPG, My 04 5.3L 1/2 ton Crew gets 13-17MPG. The Suburban has a tune & will out-run my Crew & gets better mileage....Same Engine/Trans/Gears & similar weight & tire height, The tune makes alot of difference.
I have got mid twenties out of a 00 Pontiac Trans Am LS1/M6 stock with a good tune. I highly doubt you can get that with square body brick. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
"Oh well, it's a driver."
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,467
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
kevinr, I may be wrong, but that's the impression I've gotten from following LS builds on here. You can probably get by without any fabrication, but I'm betting if you have some skills you'd be able to save some cash.
And from everything I've ever heard, the Vortecs are light years ahead of the factory TBI heads, which flow pretty badly.
__________________
- JB - '93 C1500 SHORT/FLEET SILVERADO, 350/4L60E ![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Tx
Posts: 62
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 321
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Dont do what I did (TPI 350) I dropped a ton of money and time to get the power out of it and in the long run it would of cost less to do a 5.3 swap and have more power for less money my engine stock had 210hp(TPI 350) when I was done it made 300hp @ the wheels the 5.3's start around 300hp+ (flywheel) but with tuning and simple bolt on's you can get an easy 60 to 70hp more
I didnt cheap out on my engine stealth ram injection, forged internals, splayed caps, aluminum heads & Etc. $10k invested and just redone it for more power another $3k way deep in it! a 5.3 with the same HP would of cost about 1/2 as much! when I was shopping for an engine 4 years ago the 5.3 aftermarket was just taking off and every thing was very hi cost now its cheaper to do and with the conversion kits made easy not to mention how many 5.3's you see out there with over 150k miles on them getting 15mpg+ but the down fall is all the electronics the air intake tube on my 07 suburban fell off and true a engine code and the truck was not shifting right lol |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
I ran pump regular gas on it with no problems Quote:
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Kennewick WA.
Posts: 1,437
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
I just ran across an add here in richland on CL. Can't post link from phone though. The add reads;
"6.0L LQ4 OUT OF 2500 TRUCK. HAS 60K MI. 509-539-2973 /WARRANTY." May be worth a phone call, and with the hanford layoffs hurting the economy he may not be all that firm on the price. The add is a couple pages back under parts KPR Craigslist and has pics. Posted via Mobile Device Last edited by meter swinger; 01-04-2012 at 07:21 PM. Reason: + |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
Quote:
http://kpr.craigslist.org/pts/2738448373.html $1800 for just the engine and it looks like just a long block? I am interested in a engine tranny combo, thanks though!
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,316
|
Re: LT1 vs. Vortec vs. LSx
I may have just changed directions... again...
I was browsing around the KPR CL and saw a Suburban for sale that said it had a low mile 350hp 5.7 with vortec heads. I sent a message asking if it was the GMPP 350HO and the turns out the guy selling it is my uncle! After talking to him (he had no idea I was a truck guy?), he doesn't know much about the engine, only that it was a "turn-key" crate engine that he bought about 10 or so years ago from a Chevy dealer in Hermiston, OR, that at the time was supposed to be the biggest crate engine retailer in the country. He said he is pretty sure it is not the 350HO and that it is not a roller cam, but that is about all he really knows. He did say it had worlds more power than the 350 it replaced. I am going to look at it next weekend, and probably drive it home; he said the only reason he is selling it is that it only gets driven a few weekends a year camping/hunting and that after telling him what my plans were he would adjust his asking price to the "family" discount ![]() So maybe EFI is a little further down the line for now...
__________________
2009 Honda Fit CfC (bsf 44.9 mpg) 2000 Tahoe Limited 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 2wd, will end up swb, not dually and replace CCswb below 1991 GMC CrewCab Dually 4x4, just going to fix things up for now 1982/1989 K5/GMC Jimmy 2wd 1987 GMC 1/2 ton swb 2wd Crew (sold) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|