The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2012, 03:02 PM   #1
pockets
Registered User
 
pockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 428
86 vs 87 rear flip kit

so I've been looking at lowering components and I came across a user here who got a DJM rear flip kit from summit for his 86. The price on that is about $85. Says it is a 5" drop.

For my 87 it says I need a different kit that is $200 for a 3" drop. That one has c-sections and some weld plates that the other doesn't.

Is the 86 and 87 so different that a 3" drop needs the frame notched on mine?

While I'm at it, is there any advantage to going with lowered control arms over spindles? I would imagine there is a bit of weight savings, but anything else?
__________________
Project Bad Karma
pockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 05:27 PM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Re: 86 vs 87 rear flip kit

86 & 87 rear suspensions would be the same. Drop from 'dropped a-arms' compromises ground clearance more than spindles.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 05:46 PM   #3
pockets
Registered User
 
pockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 428
Re: 86 vs 87 rear flip kit

That makes sense on the a-arms.

I couldn't imagine the 86 being different than the 87. I guess it is just how they have it categorized, but it made no sense that one item cost more, required cutting and welding and had 2" LESS of a drop.
__________________
Project Bad Karma
pockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2012, 09:10 PM   #4
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Re: 86 vs 87 rear flip kit

Quote:
Originally Posted by pockets View Post
That makes sense on the a-arms.

I couldn't imagine the 86 being different than the 87. I guess it is just how they have it categorized, but it made no sense that one item cost more, required cutting and welding and had 2" LESS of a drop.
Possibly has the wrong description. One might be a flip kit, the other might be shackles or hangers.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2012, 10:04 AM   #5
pockets
Registered User
 
pockets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 428
Re: 86 vs 87 rear flip kit

after looking at them more last night I'm starting to think that as well. They have slightly different components and there is a third kit which has a combination of these two.
__________________
Project Bad Karma
pockets is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com