Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-04-2012, 10:38 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Valley Center, Ca
Posts: 277
|
Holley 9776 450 CFM vs Edlebrock 1404 500 CFM
Just about concluded the Holley 4160 600 CFM is just too much for my stock 1972 307 out of a 72 C10.. What do you think about a Holley 9776(JEGS)450 CFM with mechanical secondaries vs a Edelbrock 1404 500FM ( sounds like tthe secondaries are not mechanical.)
Posted via Mobile Device Posted via Mobile Device |
03-04-2012, 11:29 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central OK
Posts: 396
|
Re: Holley 9776 450 CFM vs Edlebrock 1404 500 CFM
I would go with a Thunder Series if your after a double pumper sytle. The Edelbrock 18024 - Edelbrock Thunder Series AVS 500 cfm Carburetor.
Holleys are great on a race car but for a driver, I think the Edelbrocks are way better. Posted via Mobile Device |
03-05-2012, 08:03 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
|
Re: Holley 9776 450 CFM vs Edlebrock 1404 500 CFM
I would personally go with the Holley. The 450 will be hard to tune as it's primarily designed to be used with a dual quad setup.
Check into the 2300 series 500cfm 2barrel Holleys. Just make sure to get one with a 30cc pump instead of 50cc for that 307.
__________________
|
Bookmarks |
|
|