![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Durham,NC
Posts: 636
|
Re: Frame Question
Shows 179.24 in picture posted overall and 115.00 for wheel base from my view of it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
On the path to financial ruin!
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 722
|
Re: Frame Question
Yep^^^^^^^
__________________
'72 Chevelle SS--4.0 Whipple LS7, T56 Magnum, 20X9/20X13 HRE 791R, 6-piston Baer brakes, IRS '68 SWB C10--LS3, TKO-600, 22x10/22x12 HRE 948R, C5 suspension, shockwaves, custom frame Ooh Wee's Makeover...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=376280 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 89
|
Re: Frame Question
Just an observation and correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't there a typo with one of the dimensions on the drawing? On the plan view of the frame - top drawing looking down at frame, front of frame, there is a dimension of 16.44 from core support mount to center line - or half the distance across. But then the core support mount to core support mount. dimension is only 32.38 which would make the passanger side 1/2" narrower than the drivers. Should be 32.88
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|