The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-22-2012, 07:56 PM   #1
slinginrods
Registered User
 
slinginrods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: flagler beach,florida
Posts: 176
ugly discovery

well this is what i discovered after tearing the drivetrain out saturday.the frame is cracked on both sides(see circled ).what blows is i already fixed the frame where the box mounts,and totally replaced the steering components,well i guess its time to get out the welder .any body else ever run into this? i never realized how weak these trucks were.
Attached Images
 
slinginrods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 08:22 PM   #2
Goldfinger
Registered User
 
Goldfinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: laurel hill Fl
Posts: 645
Re: ugly discovery

explains why to next generation trucks had it reinforced in that area. I've jumped my truck and still haven't seen that.
__________________
1985 C10 Custom Deluxe LWB 305/700r4 [ Goldfinger ]

1999 k3500 crew cab dually 6.5tdi/4l80e
Goldfinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 08:33 PM   #3
slinginrods
Registered User
 
slinginrods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: flagler beach,florida
Posts: 176
Re: ugly discovery

im gonna weld the whole thing up,its stupid that an s10 has a stronger front crossmember area than these trucks.i wonder what the engineers were smoking when they said 'hey,lets just bolt everything together,im sure it will never loosen up or crack around the bolts".i know somebodys gonna say the reason they did it was so it would be esier to fix,but its just weak in my opinion.so shes gettin welded at every seam,besides if i ever need the replace the crossmember its time to put her down.
slinginrods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 08:44 PM   #4
Axle
Registered User
 
Axle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 1,212
Re: ugly discovery

Whenever you find yourself asking 'why?' Remind yourself they (manufacturers) only want the vehicle to last through warranty and if they can save 1/10th of a cent per vehicle all the better. Besides, they want to sell you a brand new one in 3-5 years.

Overall though, given the use and abuse these trucks got/get, getting this far is darn good.

Alex.
Axle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 09:10 PM   #5
jmedero
Registered User
 
jmedero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: pensacola fl
Posts: 3,073
Re: ugly discovery

I had a customer that was retired 45 years from gm. He was an engineer in the 50's 60's and 70's. His exact words were in 71-72 they were told to stop making them that good. The life span that they had engineered into those era vehicles would last too long.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
68 BB burb build thread Scott's super slam front/rear
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=378084
jmedero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 09:13 PM   #6
cableguy0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Delta,Pa
Posts: 14,948
Re: ugly discovery

Theres not much stress on that area. I would be suspect of that frame being bent from a crash that caused the cracks. I have seen a few cracked but most of the time its because of rust through
__________________
Owner of North Point Car Care in Dundalk Md. We specialize in custom exhaust on both modern and classic vehicles. We are a full service auto shop from classics to modern vehicles. Feel free to contact me with questions. I will give a 10% discount to any board member.
cableguy0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 09:16 PM   #7
slinginrods
Registered User
 
slinginrods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: flagler beach,florida
Posts: 176
Re: ugly discovery

i can believe that,ive been building 30s and 40s model year hot rods for 25 years and i can say ive seen my fair share of frames.a stock 1932 ford roadster frame is easily as strong as these frames are.matter of fact i would say stronger
slinginrods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 09:53 PM   #8
Goldfinger
Registered User
 
Goldfinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: laurel hill Fl
Posts: 645
Re: ugly discovery

It's got to be from a collision come to think of it. Nothing in that area could do that beside an extreme impact force.
__________________
1985 C10 Custom Deluxe LWB 305/700r4 [ Goldfinger ]

1999 k3500 crew cab dually 6.5tdi/4l80e
Goldfinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 09:55 PM   #9
LUCKIN-FOU
I'M NOT SCARED I HAVE A PLASMA
 
LUCKIN-FOU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The PLACE
Posts: 172
Re: ugly discovery

I've seen that on a bunch of trucks.
__________________
Lou Santiago
US Navy Retired/World Traveler
Car Builder/Welder/Airport Investigator
garageinsidertv.com [FORUM]

WORK IS FOR PEOPLE WHO CAN'T FISH. I GUESS I'M SCREWED BECAUSED I HATE FISHING.
LUCKIN-FOU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 10:30 PM   #10
slinginrods
Registered User
 
slinginrods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: flagler beach,florida
Posts: 176
Re: ugly discovery

Quote:
Originally Posted by LUCKIN-FOU View Post
I've seen that on a bunch of trucks.
did you weld the crossmember and frame all together?or did you just fix the cracked section?i know its causing the truck to wander all over the road like it is
slinginrods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 11:14 PM   #11
broey
Square
 
broey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 1,568
Re: ugly discovery

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axle View Post
Whenever you find yourself asking 'why?' Remind yourself they (manufacturers) only want the vehicle to last through warranty and if they can save 1/10th of a cent per vehicle all the better. Besides, they want to sell you a brand new one in 3-5 years.

Overall though, given the use and abuse these trucks got/get, getting this far is darn good.

Alex.
as a former employee of multiple car manufactures I completely disagree with this statement. dealerships loose money making any sort or warranty repairs. so they absolutely want the vehicle on the road for as long as possible. this way profit can be made from dealer service out of warranty, and through parts sales down the road. and, on the flip side. more money can usually be made from used car sales than from new car sales. chevy knows not everyone can afford a new car. but most people can afford to keep their used cars on the road and will use dealership service and parts for 10-20 years and even longer. plus, to say that chevy (or any other car company) would intentionally make a frame that will crack right there after a certain amount of time is crazy. the time and effort to design a frame with mixed strength metals that blend seamlessly through the frame and will crack at the right time would be crazy money. chevrolet spends countless millions of dollars on safety and employees top end engineers specifically to design higher quality longer lasting vehicles.
__________________
Squarebody Syndicate
broey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 11:34 PM   #12
slinginrods
Registered User
 
slinginrods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: flagler beach,florida
Posts: 176
Re: ugly discovery

i would think if it was hit hard enough to crack the frame in two places it would be pretty bent up.besides its cracked around the bolt holes.i too have been a gm tech as well as other brands for 25 years ,am now a service manager at another brand dealership,i dont think they are engineered to fall apart.i just think these were just a poor design(comared to the later model hydroformed crossmembers).the idea of a bolt together front crossmember area is just crazy,considering the car frames of that era were not.infact they were much beefier(look at a 78 impala).remember these are trucks
slinginrods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 07:23 AM   #13
motornut
78K & 79C Jimmys
 
motornut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ottawa Ont CANADA
Posts: 7,901
Re: ugly discovery

that looks like a hard hit
I hate surprises like that
kinda looks like a funny bend on the top rail?

mind you back in those days they were thinning out the frames etc ,in some cars to save weight
Attached Images
 
__________________
John
1978 GMCJimmy4X4-350/203
1979 GMCJimmy4X2-305/350
motornut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 08:44 AM   #14
J Knight
Registered User
 
J Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Baytown TX
Posts: 2,219
Re: ugly discovery

I agree with motornut, it looks like it was in a collision and got repaired. The top flange on the drivers side is a sure sign of it.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
John
82 Chevy Silverado 350ci/TH350
J Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 12:48 PM   #15
hatzie
Moderator
 
hatzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wentworth, NH
Posts: 4,977
Re: ugly discovery

Passenger side top rail looks like it took a fair belt too.
__________________
1959 M35A2 LDT465-1D SOLD
1967 Dodge W200 B383, NP420/NP201 SOLD
1969 Dodge Polara 500 B383, A833 SOLD
1972 Ford F250 FE390, NP435/NP205 SOLD
1976 Chevy K20, 6.5L, NV4500/NP208 SOLD
1986 M1008 CUCV SOLD
2000 GMC C2500, TD6.5L, NV4500
2005 Chevy Silverado LS 2500HD 6.0L 4L80E/NP263
2009 Impala SS LS4 V8


RTFM... GM Parts Books, GM Schematics, GM service manuals, and GM training materials...Please include at least the year and model in your threads. It'll be easier to answer your questions.
And please let us know if and how your repairs were successful.
hatzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com