|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-11-2012, 02:28 PM
|
#1 |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hesperia, Ca
Posts: 1,332
|
*Another* backspace/offset question
15x10 with -44mm of offset and 3.75” backspacing
Will that fit okay on the back of a square? I heard with a 10” wheel 5” of BS is optimal. This combo looks like it will work out to about 5.5” of overall BS. |
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 02:55 PM
|
#2 |
|
At the body shop.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,192
|
Re: *Another* backspace/offset question
3.75 will rub if lowered
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer " " Dont antique the equipment " |
|
|
|
|
09-11-2012, 04:43 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,006
|
Re: *Another* backspace/offset question
I have 15x10 with 5" backspacing on the rear . The tires i have are pretty big , they are 345/55/15 . I actually had to move the rear tubs in about 1 inch . With a smaller you would not have that problem .
__________________
 1985 C10 2004 Avalanche |
|
|
|
|
09-12-2012, 12:33 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern Germany,near Bremen
Posts: 684
|
Re: *Another* backspace/offset question
My Eagle 589s have exactly that offset (-44 mm) and are 15x10 but i´m not sure about the backspacing! I thought the offset defines the BS automatically?!
Volker
__________________
My little US vehicle parts business: http://www.thegearheaddepot.com/ Come have a look!  ´81 GMC C 10, Spanish Red |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
