The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2012, 06:35 AM   #1
luvbowties
Registered User
 
luvbowties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: southeasternfoothillsofusa
Posts: 1,557
Thumbs up Re: Disc Brake Conversion Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcramos72 View Post
luvbowties,

Thanks so much for all of the info. I just drilled a hole 1" lower on the brake pedal bar and unfortunately no diff.

I think you might be on to something regarding my pedal not pushing completely into the MC. When I was bench bleeding the MC, at the end it got to the point where I could barely push the piston in, so I figured it was fully bled. I would assume if the booster rod was pushing into the MC I would encounter that same resistance, but like I sad it goes right to the floor very easily. I'm gonna call Early Classics as well to see if they know anything about a spacer. Like I said I'm pretty sure the piston I was pushing against was flat with no shape at all, but to bleed it I did have to stick a phillips in to the MC about 1" to contact the piston.

One question. When the motor is running the pedal goes to the floor very easily, but when I turn off the motor there is a bit more resistance in the pedal. Any reason for that?

Also this is a dual MC kit with dual front lines and proportioning valve. There is a thick (rear) line and a thin (front) line coming of the PV. Thick line goes to the rear and thin line breaks off to the calipers. Doesn't seem to be any leaks and I did bleed all wheels after I hooked up the MC.

Thanks!

Dan
((One question. When the motor is running the pedal goes to the floor very easily, but when I turn off the motor there is a bit more resistance in the pedal. Any reason for that?))...That is good: it shows your booster is 'boosting' and making it easier to depress the brake pedal while running, which is the correct thing for it to do.

I still think the little spacer is going to be the solution. I read about some 'Corvette-style' mc's last nite, & the site mentioned it included an 'adapter' for the different style mc.

This site mentions the different mc's, the deep-hole and the shallow-hole. Don't see the site mentioning including the adapter right now(gotta go meet my walking buddies).
>> http://www.tuffstuffperformance.com/...cat/cat210.htm <<
luvbowties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 09:13 AM   #2
CRGRS 66
Registered User
 
CRGRS 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,771
Re: Disc Brake Conversion Question

Thank you to the OP, and all who have posted. It is just such a tremendous education hanging out on this forum. I will be doing a similar upgrade this winter, one more bit of knowledge that may save me time and agro.
__________________
Craigerrr

My build thread, CRGRS 66 Winter Build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...09#post5638709
CRGRS 66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 10:16 AM   #3
luvbowties
Registered User
 
luvbowties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: southeasternfoothillsofusa
Posts: 1,557
Thumbs up Re: Disc Brake Conversion Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by luvbowties View Post
((One question. When the motor is running the pedal goes to the floor very easily, but when I turn off the motor there is a bit more resistance in the pedal. Any reason for that?))...That is good: it shows your booster is 'boosting' and making it easier to depress the brake pedal while running, which is the correct thing for it to do.

I still think the little spacer is going to be the solution. I read about some 'Corvette-style' mc's last nite, & the site mentioned it included an 'adapter' for the different style mc.

This site mentions the different mc's, the deep-hole and the shallow-hole. Don't see the site mentioning including the adapter right now(gotta go meet my walking buddies).
>> http://www.tuffstuffperformance.com/...cat/cat210.htm <<
Ok, here's a site that mentions, very briefly, the deep-bore adapter
>> http://www.performanceonline.com/Dru...Type-MC-82016/ <<.

And here are 2 pics I found on another forum's site that show how the same mod can be done by adapting a longer-or-shorter pushrod out of the booster to accomplish the same thing. Pics show 2 diff. boosters--older one for a shallow-bore and newer one that adjusts for either mc by adding/removing a screw-on booster-rod-lengthener/shortener [Still haven't found a pic of an actual bore-plug adapter--it is so simple to make one. I experimented w/a round wooden rod from Lowe's to get the correct length:so cheap & easy to cut and trim, and cut another one if you cut it too short, etc. You want to have a tad of clearance between your booster-rod and piston-adapter (or piston itself if using a shallow-bore mc)].

>> http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y20...r/101_8025.jpg <<

>> http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y20...r/101_8026.jpg <<
luvbowties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 11:30 AM   #4
luvbowties
Registered User
 
luvbowties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: southeasternfoothillsofusa
Posts: 1,557
Thumbs up Re: Disc Brake Conversion Question

...and finally a pic of an adapter, thanks to CPP. Look about halfway down the site.

> http://www.classicperform.com/TechBo...ot.htm#pushrod <
luvbowties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 03:53 PM   #5
dcramos72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Richmond, CA
Posts: 11
Re: Disc Brake Conversion Question

Wow,

Fantastic info bowties. Thanks!

I called Early Classics and explained everything. They said their booster and mc do not need a spacer or adapter and should work together right out of the box. They advised that I try rebleeding everything as it takes a lot of bleeding to get the full system fully pressured. I will try this and if it doesn't work give them a call back or try an adpater.

I defintitely have the 1" bore from looking at pics on CPP.

I wonder if there is anyone else out there that has bought a kit from Early Classics and had this same issue?

Thanks again for all of the info. I'll let you know how things progress.

Dan
dcramos72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com