The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2012, 11:02 PM   #1
towbar
Registered User
 
towbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Marshall, NC....heart of the Appalachians.....aka, Gods country!!
Posts: 537
CPP tubular control arms

anyone know if the CPP tubular control arms re-position the front wheel to center it more in the wheel well like the Porterbuilts? or do they just offer better alignment geometry than stock??
towbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 09:34 AM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,008
Re: CPP tubular control arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by towbar View Post
anyone know if the CPP tubular control arms re-position the front wheel to center it more in the wheel well like the Porterbuilts? or do they just offer better alignment geometry than stock??
I've never read any info about CPP's arms changing the wheelbase.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 10:45 AM   #3
Hart_Rod
*************
 
Hart_Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 17,854
Re: CPP tubular control arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by towbar View Post
anyone know if the CPP tubular control arms re-position the front wheel to center it more in the wheel well like the Porterbuilts? or do they just offer better alignment geometry than stock??
It's my understanding that they just provide better alignment geometry. I'm getting ready to install a set (coils not bags) and will let you know.
Hart_Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 11:24 AM   #4
towbar
Registered User
 
towbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Marshall, NC....heart of the Appalachians.....aka, Gods country!!
Posts: 537
Re: CPP tubular control arms

thanks Hart Rod....was considering the Porterbuilts for improved geometry and centering of the wheel in the wheel well but the CPP are more economical if they do the same thing? havent heard any hype about it on the CPP side so I'm asuming they dont but thought I pop the question anyway and see what shakes out....keep me posted on the arms if you can?
towbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 11:53 AM   #5
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,008
Re: CPP tubular control arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by towbar View Post
thanks Hart Rod....was considering the Porterbuilts for improved geometry and centering of the wheel in the wheel well but the CPP are more economical if they do the same thing? havent heard any hype about it on the CPP side so I'm asuming they dont but thought I pop the question anyway and see what shakes out....keep me posted on the arms if you can?
Another benefit of PB's arms are they utilize Delrin type bushings vs poly. Delrin is more precise & less binding.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 12:11 PM   #6
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: CPP tubular control arms

As far as I am aware, we are the only company building arms that locate the lower ball joint "forward" for improved performance and aestetics. For now anyways.

The CPP arms also use a solid style bushing... I don't believe it is delrin, but a similar material. They are a nice product.
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com

Phone: 480-297-2621

E-mail: sales@pbfab.com


Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication

Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck.

We offer components from the following manufacturers:

Porterbuilt
Accuair
Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies)
Air Lift
Wilwood
Intro
Unisteer
ECE
Gotta Show
Air Lift
Borgeson
CPP


Supporting this forum since 2003!
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 01:37 PM   #7
CC69Rat
Registered User
 
CC69Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga TN
Posts: 6,207
Re: CPP tubular control arms

Nate - do you have to change upper and lower to do the 1" forward mod? Can you do 63-70 balljoints?
__________________
Chad

1967 C10 SWB - Project Savannah - 6.0/4L80 *Currently underway*
1968 C10 SWB - TOTY 2018, 50th Anniversary Tribute Project * Sold * Pride and Joy
1986 Silverado Short Fleet - Scarlet *Sold*
1985 Silverado Short Fleet *Sold*
2022 Jeep Gladiator Mojave
2001 Jeep Cherokee XJ 4x4 - Lifted, Built
1992 Jeep Cherokee XJ 4x4 - Lifted
2013 Honda Accord EX-L v6 Coupe 6spd (wife's ride)
CC69Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 01:47 PM   #8
theastronaut
Registered User
 
theastronaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Anderson SC
Posts: 3,894
Re: CPP tubular control arms

Hotchkis arms also move the wheels forward. Lots more $$$ though.
theastronaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 03:08 PM   #9
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: CPP tubular control arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC69Rat View Post
Nate - do you have to change upper and lower to do the 1" forward mod? Can you do 63-70 balljoints?
In order to get the most performance gains (increased castor) you can run the lower arm only. It doesn't move the wheel quite as far forward as doing the upper and lower as a set. We sell quite a few of the lower arms only.

If it is more of the aestetic centering of the wheel that is desired, then the uppers combined with the lowers will give the best result.

63-70 ball joints are no problem.
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com

Phone: 480-297-2621

E-mail: sales@pbfab.com


Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication

Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck.

We offer components from the following manufacturers:

Porterbuilt
Accuair
Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies)
Air Lift
Wilwood
Intro
Unisteer
ECE
Gotta Show
Air Lift
Borgeson
CPP


Supporting this forum since 2003!
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 05:24 PM   #10
towbar
Registered User
 
towbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Marshall, NC....heart of the Appalachians.....aka, Gods country!!
Posts: 537
Re: CPP tubular control arms

Yes, definitely wanting to center the wheel for improved aesthetics.....some of our trucks seem to be more noticeable than others and likely mine will be noticeable with a 5.5/7 static drop....so if the Porterbuilt upper and lower arms together move the wheel forward in the wheel well effectively 1", how much does just the lower alone move it....is it 1/2", 3/4", 1/4"....any idea?

the PB lowers come complete with year specific (67-70 or 71 & 2) ball joints correct?

what type of sway bar can be used....does it require changing to an end link style?
towbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2012, 06:31 PM   #11
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: CPP tubular control arms

Quote:
Originally Posted by towbar View Post
Yes, definitely wanting to center the wheel for improved aesthetics.....some of our trucks seem to be more noticeable than others and likely mine will be noticeable with a 5.5/7 static drop....so if the Porterbuilt upper and lower arms together move the wheel forward in the wheel well effectively 1", how much does just the lower alone move it....is it 1/2", 3/4", 1/4"....any idea?

the PB lowers come complete with year specific (67-70 or 71 & 2) ball joints correct?

what type of sway bar can be used....does it require changing to an end link style?
Typically we move the upper ball joint forward approx. 1/2" and the lower 1" when we do the set. This moves the wheel forward in the 3/4" range... it is very noticeable.

We can also build them where the upper AND lower are moved forward 1". This moves the wheel the whole inch forward. This configuration doesn't get the same castor gain.

If we do the lowers only, it will move the wheel forward right between 1/2" and 3/4".

Here's a pic of the upper and lower forward arm combo (factory x-member with bags)
Attached Images
 
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com

Phone: 480-297-2621

E-mail: sales@pbfab.com


Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication

Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck.

We offer components from the following manufacturers:

Porterbuilt
Accuair
Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies)
Air Lift
Wilwood
Intro
Unisteer
ECE
Gotta Show
Air Lift
Borgeson
CPP


Supporting this forum since 2003!
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2012, 06:49 PM   #12
Madmartigan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Mira Loma, CA
Posts: 219
Re: CPP tubular control arms

So the arms on "Picacho" are both moved forward 1"? Uppers 1" and lowers 1"?
Madmartigan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com