The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2003, 01:33 AM   #1
78' Silverado
\/ My Loves \/
 
78' Silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midland,Texas
Posts: 462
WOW!!!! Solid Roller Cams are Expensive!

Well....I called Comp Cams. And I was talking to one of there Tech theres. I told him all the info about the truck. And he matched up a Soild Roller cam for me. All i really remeber is the Lift and exhaust/intake which was a .342 Intake.....346 Exhaust....at a .575 lift. Anyways I got the Part Number. And wow lol. For a full cam "set" it was 1,000 Dollars. But for the Cma/Lifter set it was about 700. I was like DAM!!!!!!.....Better start savin lol. Cuz thats half of the cost of my heads haha. But....I will only get the best of the best. BTW I got my lowering springs in oday!!! yay!!! lol..now all i need is my flip kit haha :P Later Yall!!

Tyler
__________________
78' Silverado - Blue - (In a Coma)
04' Silverado -Red-

383 Stroker in progress for the 78'!!!
78' Silverado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 02:13 AM   #2
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,400
have you ordered your flip kit yet? if not, i've got one i'm interested in selling.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 03:21 AM   #3
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Just curious, but why are you going with a Solid Roller Cam? You can get by just as good (if not BETTER) with a Hydraulic roller, and it will be easier to maintain...NOW, if you're going to spend a LOT of time above 6500rpm, THEN I DO recommend the Solid Roller...otherwise, Hydraulic Roller will be fine.
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 01:40 PM   #4
AirMale
Senior Member
 
AirMale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlantic City, NJ
Posts: 1,073
I went with a full hydraulic roller set-up from comp cams and love it. One word of advice: If you plan on driving your truck on the street daily go with a cam that has a lower duration @50. Anything in the 300's is way to radical for a daily driver. Nice thing about CompCams is they offer the roller cams with a cast dist. drive gear so bronze gear is not necc. Good luck 342-346? WOW! I think that tech guy is doin' Oxy's wth Rush
__________________
86 SWB 9.0 LITER
T-400-OD 4.11 eaton-4/5 drop
Best 1/4 12.51 @112mph no traction
AirMale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 03:05 PM   #5
78' Silverado
\/ My Loves \/
 
78' Silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midland,Texas
Posts: 462
Yea...I am still guna consider that cam. But..My friends wants me to get htis cam he thinks would work better but we'll see. And yes MY flip was odered last week...it should be here tuesday.
__________________
78' Silverado - Blue - (In a Coma)
04' Silverado -Red-

383 Stroker in progress for the 78'!!!
78' Silverado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 05:10 PM   #6
bpmcgee
Registered User
 
bpmcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 2,181
We just put a comp cams 12-407-8 hydraulic roller cam in a buddies 76 corvette. Man that thing runs nicely!

Not sure the mileage yet, but it's got 15 inches of vacuum at idle.

Brian
bpmcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 05:52 PM   #7
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally posted by AirMale
If you plan on driving your truck on the street daily go with a cam that has a lower duration @50. Anything in the 300's is way to radical for a daily driver.
Hmm, on my daily driven 87 Corvette, it's getting a Comp Cam that's 112 C/L with 219/219 duration @ .050, with .560/.560 lift @ .050
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2003, 08:35 AM   #8
Mike76251
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,500
It is much cheaper to go roller if you have a one-piece rear late model block as you can use the factory stuff......the GM roller lifters are made by Crane anyway.....and the GM roller Vette cams are pretty good for a daily driver.
That is how I did my 383 except I had Crane make me a custom cam.
Attached Images
 
Mike76251 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2003, 03:44 PM   #9
TwinTurbo
Registered User
 
TwinTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 994
You don't need a later model block for OEM roller lifters. The V8 lifters are taller than the flat tappets but the 60deg. V6 uses shorter ones, they fit inside the lifter bores and you can use stock retainers, only need to profile the retainer edges and trim own the coolant walls (the radius sections), then true up the lifter bore tops if needed, drill & tap the cam bore and install the spider plate. The plate will have sufficient tension because the later block uses pedestals, the earliers don't have it but the lifter bores are about .400 lower too. Will be good to about .55 lift, above that anyone would go solid roller anyway.

Cheap roller cam for 1/2 the money of retrofit stuff and good quality too, no worries about beams getting loose and rollers digging into the lobe.
TwinTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2003, 06:13 PM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,963
TwinTurbo, 4.3 vortec roller lifters correct? And could you explain the "trim down the coolant walls ( the radius sections)" in more detail. This sounds interesting.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2003, 07:38 PM   #11
TwinTurbo
Registered User
 
TwinTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 994
nope, they must be the (3,1L) 60deg. V6 lifters, GM17120070

You must profile these sections: (green, of course on BOTH sides)
TwinTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2003, 09:45 PM   #12
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,963
Oh....... duh, you did say 60deg. I should've read what I was reading.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2003, 05:04 PM   #13
DMAN
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Benicia,Ca.
Posts: 128
Which push rods would you use? Do the tops of the lifter bores need to be machined or could you do it with a die grinder?
__________________
'71 Custom Deluxe K10, shortbed, fleetside.
DMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com