![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Msgt USAF Ret
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kalamazoo, Michigan
Posts: 8,725
|
Re: Bad Fuel Gauge?
[quote=gringoloco;5813949]Yes, I set up the new sender arm to be on the bottom of the tank at 0 and at the top at 90. Not sure if this is what you're asking?
Yes that was what I was thinking. Quote:
Being an oversized tank if it was longer than the stock tank then you would be able to put more fuel in it before the gauge registers. Do you have a vehicle with the stock tank you can use the sender in for comparison?
__________________
VetteVet metallic green 67 stepside 74 corvette convertible 1965 Harley sportster 1995 Harley wide glide Growing old is hell, but it beats the alternative. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
A guy with a truck
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
|
Re: Bad Fuel Gauge?
Quote:
Quote:
I'm still thinking 42 ohms at the fuse box should equate to somewhere around the halfway mark on the gauge?
__________________
-Chris Instagram _elgringoloco_ '70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10 ‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd '72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD) '72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD) '05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD) ‘07 Yukon Denali (daily) Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|