The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2013, 03:28 PM   #1
CRGRS 66
Registered User
 
CRGRS 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,771
Rubber or Urethane???????

I need to be ordering cab mounts and trailing arm bushings (hence this is in the suspension forum) soon.

My set up in the front will be 2.5" drop spindles and 2" drop springs (otherwise stock setup), and my rear suspension will be a porterbuilt stage one bag kit with porterbuilt adjustable trac bar. No notch in back, bags are just to adjust ride height if towing, or carrying a load. Should be running around equivalent to a 3" or 4" drop.

I am inclined to order the urethane kits, but would be interested in hear opinions from you guys who have used one, the other, or both.
__________________
Craigerrr

My build thread, CRGRS 66 Winter Build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...09#post5638709
CRGRS 66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 03:55 PM   #2
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,578
Re: Rubber or Urethane???????

I like urethane because of its stiffness, but I never had trailing arm suspension. I have only used them in A-arm/leaf suspension.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 07:37 PM   #3
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,938
Re: Rubber or Urethane???????

For the truck arm front bushings, I'd use them. For cab mounts, I'd use rubber. I don't see the need for poly as a body mount.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 08:04 PM   #4
69gmcc10
Registered User
 
69gmcc10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 934
Re: Rubber or Urethane???????

From a handling stand point the urethane body mounts are supposed to tie the frame and chassis together and make it a stronger unit. It also is a more firm ride than rubber. For the trailing arms urethane stiffens up the joints and limits deflection of the joint, according to No Limit Engineering the only thing that should be rubber is the trailing arm mounts so there is less binding at that pivot point and everything else should be urethane for rigidity.

I have urethane cab mounts and didnt notice much difference in ride and I also have urethane trailing arm mounts and I think they are just fine, they certainly will last longer than the rubber will in that joint!
__________________
69 GMC C10 build thread- http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=501676

03 Silverado build thread-http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=591582
69gmcc10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 10:35 PM   #5
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,938
Re: Rubber or Urethane???????

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69gmcc10 View Post
From a handling stand point the urethane body mounts are supposed to tie the frame and chassis together and make it a stronger unit. It also is a more firm ride than rubber. For the trailing arms urethane stiffens up the joints and limits deflection of the joint, according to No Limit Engineering the only thing that should be rubber is the trailing arm mounts so there is less binding at that pivot point and everything else should be urethane for rigidity.

I have urethane cab mounts and didnt notice much difference in ride and I also have urethane trailing arm mounts and I think they are just fine, they certainly will last longer than the rubber will in that joint!
For OE truck arms, the poly bushings are fine. For solid, tubular type aftermarket arms that can't flex torsionally like the OE I-beam can, I would not do poly.

I agree the poly cab mounts will last longer. But, if you're not seeking a roller coaster type cornering experience, the rubbers will last years & are easy enough to replace should you keep your truck another 20+ years on the road. I would think the main downfall of them isn't so much a worse ride, but increased noise/vibration levels if the truck has the pre-73 type rubber-bushed metal sleeve trype a-arm bushings.

Interestingly... my buddy recently priced some Moog a-arm bushings & rubber body mounts @ the local auto parts place only to find the poly stuff available @ a pretty decent reduction in cost from Summit. If it's cheaper to do poly, they're the way to go.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com