Sanderson CC11 headers - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

b1kem1ke · 04-12-2013, 03:17 PM

Has anyone got these to work? Sanderson claims they should work, but every vehicle is a little bit different. I have about a 1/4" clearance to the engine mount bracket on the driver's side, the passenger side touches on my 'test fit', will get worse after bolts are snugged (maybe 1/4" interference).

It's the 'bulge' of the bracket that's in the way. How much clearance is ideal/minimal? Does anyone know of some brand with more header clearance? Or engine mounts that sit the whole engine maybe 1/2" higher? If so, is it an 'easy swap', i.e. lift the engine slightly to replace without a removal? I'm a machinist, thinking of making my own, but don't want a time consuming project if there's an easy fix I'm overlooking.

Here's the side that is o.k., but you can see where the tube is close. That's where the problem is at on the other side.

nicolas72gmc · 04-12-2013, 03:38 PM

The Sandersons that Early Classic Enterprises sells clears just fine. I think they are the CC10's. You can find them on their website. I'm running them with no problems.

b1kem1ke · 04-12-2013, 04:59 PM

Thanks. Just looked at their site. They have their own numbering system (no CC#), but they look like the ones I have. Might have to call Sanderson...

nicolas72gmc · 04-12-2013, 05:31 PM

When I called to order these, (like a year ago), I recall Mark, from ECE, telling me they were the #10 model. Hope this helps.

jgmc · 04-12-2013, 11:46 PM

I bought the Sanderson headers a few years back from Early Classic and they didn't work for me either. I ended up with Stan's Headers made right in the beautiful state of Washington.

Z10 · 04-12-2013, 11:53 PM

Soon to find out if the CC11 fit my 72. These were recommended by another forum member who is using them.

Gmcfolife · 04-13-2013, 12:24 PM

I have the ECE headers which are the cc10's I have at least 3/4" clearance on each side.
Posted via Mobile Device

Gmcfolife · 04-13-2013, 12:25 PM

Posted via Mobile Device

rogergodding · 04-13-2013, 06:28 PM

I have them with no problems, supposed to be cc-10

elf w/capital T · 04-13-2013, 08:27 PM

Wow, those are slick!!!!

gonnuts · 04-13-2013, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogergodding

I have them with no problems, supposed to be cc-10

Ditto.
Posted via Mobile Device
Posted via Mobile Device

Z10 · 04-13-2013, 09:13 PM

If I'm not mistaken the CC11 are for "D" port heads. That may be the only difference between them and the CC10?

nicolas72gmc · 04-13-2013, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z10

If I'm not mistaken the CC11 are for "D" port heads. That may be the only difference between them and the CC10?

And angled plugs.
Posted via Mobile Device

nicolas72gmc · 04-13-2013, 09:44 PM

Posted via Mobile Device

nicolas72gmc · 04-13-2013, 09:46 PM

Mine clear no problems
Posted via Mobile Device

04-12-2013, 03:38 PM	#2
nicolas72gmc Registered User Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Sunny Arizona Posts: 525	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers The Sandersons that Early Classic Enterprises sells clears just fine. I think they are the CC10's. You can find them on their website. I'm running them with no problems. __________________ Nick "Everyone has a plan, 'till they get punched in the mouth".........Mike Tyson 1968, GMC, SWB, Project 1972, GMC, LWB, Daily Driver, 383, headers, 2.5"/3" exhaust, 200r4, 3.5/5 ECE components. 1972, C/10, LWB, 350 vortec, th350

04-12-2013, 04:59 PM	#3
b1kem1ke Registered User Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: North of Seattle, WA Posts: 13	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers Thanks. Just looked at their site. They have their own numbering system (no CC#), but they look like the ones I have. Might have to call Sanderson...

04-12-2013, 05:31 PM	#4
nicolas72gmc Registered User Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Sunny Arizona Posts: 525	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers When I called to order these, (like a year ago), I recall Mark, from ECE, telling me they were the #10 model. Hope this helps. __________________ Nick "Everyone has a plan, 'till they get punched in the mouth".........Mike Tyson 1968, GMC, SWB, Project 1972, GMC, LWB, Daily Driver, 383, headers, 2.5"/3" exhaust, 200r4, 3.5/5 ECE components. 1972, C/10, LWB, 350 vortec, th350

04-12-2013, 11:46 PM	#5
jgmc Registered User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Brier Washington Posts: 119	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers I bought the Sanderson headers a few years back from Early Classic and they didn't work for me either. I ended up with Stan's Headers made right in the beautiful state of Washington.

04-12-2013, 11:53 PM	#6
Z10 Registered User Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Midland, TX Posts: 1,267	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers Soon to find out if the CC11 fit my 72. These were recommended by another forum member who is using them. __________________ 1969 RS/SS Z10 Camaro Pace coupe 1972 GMC Short Step buildhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post6356218 1979 Mazda RX7 1979 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 & 1979 Pontiac Trans Am 10th Anniversary 1999 Honda Valkyrie 2006 Corvette Z06 2010 BMW 650i

04-12-2013, 03:17 PM	#1
b1kem1ke Registered User Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: North of Seattle, WA Posts: 13	Sanderson CC11 headers Has anyone got these to work? Sanderson claims they should work, but every vehicle is a little bit different. I have about a 1/4" clearance to the engine mount bracket on the driver's side, the passenger side touches on my 'test fit', will get worse after bolts are snugged (maybe 1/4" interference). It's the 'bulge' of the bracket that's in the way. How much clearance is ideal/minimal? Does anyone know of some brand with more header clearance? Or engine mounts that sit the whole engine maybe 1/2" higher? If so, is it an 'easy swap', i.e. lift the engine slightly to replace without a removal? I'm a machinist, thinking of making my own, but don't want a time consuming project if there's an easy fix I'm overlooking. Here's the side that is o.k., but you can see where the tube is close. That's where the problem is at on the other side.

04-13-2013, 12:24 PM	#7
Gmcfolife Registered User Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Santee,CA Posts: 182	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers I have the ECE headers which are the cc10's I have at least 3/4" clearance on each side. Posted via Mobile Device Attached Images

04-13-2013, 12:25 PM	#8
Gmcfolife Registered User Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Santee,CA Posts: 182	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers Posted via Mobile Device Attached Images

04-13-2013, 06:28 PM	#9
rogergodding Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Sachse, Texas Posts: 614	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers I have them with no problems, supposed to be cc-10

04-13-2013, 08:27 PM	#10
elf w/capital T Registered User Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: North Carolina Posts: 993	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers Wow, those are slick!!!!

04-13-2013, 09:13 PM	#12
Z10 Registered User Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Midland, TX Posts: 1,267	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers If I'm not mistaken the CC11 are for "D" port heads. That may be the only difference between them and the CC10? __________________ 1969 RS/SS Z10 Camaro Pace coupe 1972 GMC Short Step buildhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post6356218 1979 Mazda RX7 1979 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 & 1979 Pontiac Trans Am 10th Anniversary 1999 Honda Valkyrie 2006 Corvette Z06 2010 BMW 650i

04-13-2013, 09:44 PM	#14
nicolas72gmc Registered User Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Sunny Arizona Posts: 525	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers Posted via Mobile Device Attached Images __________________ Nick "Everyone has a plan, 'till they get punched in the mouth".........Mike Tyson 1968, GMC, SWB, Project 1972, GMC, LWB, Daily Driver, 383, headers, 2.5"/3" exhaust, 200r4, 3.5/5 ECE components. 1972, C/10, LWB, 350 vortec, th350

04-13-2013, 09:46 PM	#15
nicolas72gmc Registered User Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Sunny Arizona Posts: 525	Re: Sanderson CC11 headers Mine clear no problems Posted via Mobile Device Attached Images __________________ Nick "Everyone has a plan, 'till they get punched in the mouth".........Mike Tyson 1968, GMC, SWB, Project 1972, GMC, LWB, Daily Driver, 383, headers, 2.5"/3" exhaust, 200r4, 3.5/5 ECE components. 1972, C/10, LWB, 350 vortec, th350



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.