Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-01-2013, 01:09 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chula Vista California
Posts: 526
|
307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
I always thought that my truck engine was 350, until today that will lead to the machine shop to rectify, and tell me that it is a 307. I would like to read your opinions if continuing with the project to repair the 307 or change it by a 350.
I would like to modify slightly the engine, I have an edelbrock intake, and I would like to tell me that could do with the heads, pistons and the camshaft, or which of them would be sufficient. I do not prettend have a racing truck but if you have some more power would be great. |
05-01-2013, 01:32 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Newhall CA
Posts: 1,195
|
Re: 307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
If it were me i would rebuild a 350,
__________________
69 SWB 780hp Hellcat powered, manual 6 speed, currie 9 |
05-01-2013, 05:52 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 267
|
Re: 307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
Not that you can't make good power with a 307, but you get more bang for your buck with a 4" bore block (327, 350, 383, etc). If I ever have to pull mine, its not going back in.
|
05-01-2013, 06:22 AM | #4 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: 307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
I rebuilt a 307 using an RV cam (makes low end tq/decent hwy mileage),1.94 valve heads,and a 4bbl Holley spread bore on stock manifold. The CFM was 450. I had it in a K/20 4spd w/4.57 gears and 14.50/37 tires. It got 13 mpg and had plenty of power. The best thing about a 307 is it will outlast a 350. More could be done than I did. I was looking for am engine with respectable power that would use less fuel...just like people need today.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
05-01-2013, 06:33 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Carrboro NC
Posts: 71
|
Re: 307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
I rebuilt my 307 stock with a 2 barrel and headers with flow masters. Not only does it sound great but I get 17 / 18 mpg every week !
You can't get that out of a 350 I love a 307 Posted via Mobile Device |
05-01-2013, 10:50 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 784
|
Re: 307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
A long time ago I tried to punch up a 307 with a cam, manifold, carb and headers, and all it did was get louder.
|
05-01-2013, 11:44 AM | #7 | ||
"I ain't nobody, dork."
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
|
Re: 307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
For a good DD, that will live a long life... you can't beat a 307. If you're looking to make power out of a Smallie... go with a 350 or a 400.
Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars... My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread. The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-01-2013, 11:46 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Newhall CA
Posts: 1,195
|
Re: 307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
pull one from a junk yard, maybe look for a 400 small block 150.00
__________________
69 SWB 780hp Hellcat powered, manual 6 speed, currie 9 |
05-02-2013, 01:08 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chula Vista California
Posts: 526
|
Re: 307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
Thank you for al your comments and opinions, I like what Brian Plaster did.
|
05-02-2013, 07:11 AM | #10 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: 307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
That'll happen with any motor if you don't get the right combination. You can even hurt performance. A 307 from '70 has HP that rivals the 454 that came in a SS454 truck,just for a little perspective. No,those weren't break your neck powerhouses,but you catch my drift. A 307 isn't as anemic as some seem to think.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
05-02-2013, 07:31 AM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,165
|
Re: 307 not 350 at my C10 69 1/2 ton.
Quote:
__________________
'83 K20-TPI '73 C10 '79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD) '07 Tahoe(Son driving) '14 Suburban-DD '71 C10-current project |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|