The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 05-23-2013, 04:35 AM   #11
jon75
Registered User
 
jon75's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tustin, CA
Posts: 77
Re: How Many Miles Per Tank?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Firebirdjones View Post
I get 22 mpg with the 6.0 LQ4 (LS engine basically) swapped into my 72 4x4 blazer, 4L60 and 3.73's on 33" tires, and no cylinder deactivation (that's cheating ). Alot of people told me mileage wasn't going to be it's strong suit either, but it holds it's own against any new V8 SUV. A 6.0 is just 364 cubes, it's not a big engine by any means.

There is so much more to mileage than the engine choice. It's really best to concentrate on the little things before spending money changing the total package. So many things that rob power and MPG. Tires, wheels, the weight of the tires and wheels, tread patterns, the tune, the weight of the vehicle, driveshaft, engine driven fans, oil viscosity, gas quality, correct gear choices, transmission choices. You can go on and on, and find at least 2-3 mpg if you are willing to spend the time and money on simple things first.

If I can get 14 mpg out of my 79 1 ton with a 502/400 turbo and 3.73's then anyone can at least do it with a 350. I'm expecting to pick up another 2-3 mpg with the gearvendor install.
I find your claims of 22mpg interesting with a 6.0 in a blazer, especially with the setup you are running. I worked for GM for a number of years and was there when the LQ engines were released. They have never been efficient engines, they are made for torque. But if that claim IS true, please write GM and let them know how you did it!

I do agree that there is a lot more to MPG than the engine so I was glad to hear you say that.

And I have a 350 in my truck. Without changing the front and rear gears to a 2.89 or something, there's no way I will achieve the economy you are claiming in your truck with the 502 (I have 4.11 gears and an SM465 tranny). Maybe one thing you are missing in your list is load % on the engine while cruising.

I'm really not trying to start anything, but if you could clarify how in the heck you did achieve these numbers, please enlighten us! Share the wealth man!
__________________
1975 GMC Sierra Grande K25HD 350-4BBL 4sp LWB
2009 Infiniti G37S Sedan w/Stillen sway bar kit & K&N Typhoon dual snorkel intakes

ASE certified for brakes, electrical diagnostics and heating and A/C & EPA certified in R12 and R134a
jon75 is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com