05-24-2013, 08:45 AM | #51 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ontario
Posts: 134
|
Re: low as possible
was originally approx 7-9 3" spindles 2 loops cut off the springs, back is flipped with belltech shackle and hanger kit. the long tubes on it are the biggest issue. and with 235/75/15 it rubbed the inners and threw sparks the entire 2 mile drive home. paint cap is 2" tall
__________________
85 swb c10 6/6 drop 83 c10 bagged and sfbd project |
06-03-2013, 10:07 PM | #52 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Orillia,ON Canada
Posts: 104
|
Re: low as possible
its 6 inch drop up front and a flip kit in the rear. i might go an inch lower in the rear tho. this is when i first pulled it out of my garage the springs are now broken in and it tucks about half the tire up front. i have about half a pop can of clearance before my control arms hit the ground. its my daily driver and i love it
__________________
Jeremy '86 GMC 1500 dropped 6" in the front and 6" in the rear 2003 Land Rover Discovery Low Life |
06-03-2013, 10:24 PM | #53 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 293
|
Re: low as possible
5-6" drop up front, only about 4-5" drop in the back :/
__________________
1980 C10 SWB Yukon 5.3/5 speed 3.73 gears. |
06-04-2013, 12:19 PM | #54 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
Posts: 863
|
Re: low as possible
IV. Pure trolling, either to upset someone or simply for your personal
enjoyment, is strictly prohibited. If you're here to cause trouble, it will be a very short stay. Immediate BAN and you will be reported to your ISP. XIII. If you are a long time member, act like one. Lead by example and assist other newer members rather then attacking them. We look upon our veteran members to use this opportunity to teach the newer members the appropriate message board usage. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a...t.php?f=34&a=9
__________________
|
06-05-2013, 12:19 AM | #55 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 114
|
Re: low as possible
^^^^That wasn't very nice. Constructive criticism I can deal with, however there was nothing constructive about that. I get it, you prefer a short bed, but there are alot of people here such as myself that prefer a longbed and we are all here because we share the same love for these trucks, long, short, narrow, or wide. Just because you don't like them doesn't mean you have to audibly voice your opinion, or talk bad about them. In conclusion there was nothing helpful about your post as it does not contain anything that is remotely related to the thread that the op started.
__________________
Rally 'round the family....with a pocket full of shells. |
06-05-2013, 03:21 AM | #56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Madison, Ohio
Posts: 21,373
|
Re: low as possible
I for one like LWB trucks while some like SWB trucks. Lets support both. Thanks
__________________
A husband can be right...or...A husband can be happy. 67-72 Chevy and GMC Trucks...The Classic Truck for the Classic Folk. 1970 CST Two tone green, 402BB, 400 Automatic, Tach, Buckets, AC, AM-FM, Tilt, GM CB, GM 8 Tract, LWB, etc JOHN 17:3...The better side of "LIFE" Remember: Everyday is a good day...Some are just gooder! |
06-05-2013, 09:41 AM | #57 |
been here longer than Liz
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: low as possible
The '87 has 6/8 and it was my DD for years. You just learn the roads around you a lot better.
__________________
~Greg~ Mac's Garage '87 SWB 6/8 drop "Piso" '08 CCSB Silverado DD the departed '89 GMC K5 Jimmy 4x4 "Rusty Nuts" '77 Chevy K5 Blazer 2wd '83 Chevy stepside "You get what you pay for" - Mike 'swervin ervin' Ervin |
Bookmarks |
|
|