Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-09-2013, 07:19 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Silver Spring Md.
Posts: 4
|
1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes
Does anyone know what is involved in swapping out drums/shoes from the 11" x 2" drums/shoes to the 11-5/32 drum & 2-3/4" shoes? Inside specs are almost identical. Wheels are the same 5x5.
Drums are deeper of course but otherwise, what would be the problem with a swap? I would really like to use the larger pads if I could! Thanks for any responses |
06-09-2013, 07:32 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
|
Re: 1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes
The backing plates, drums, & shoes are different between the two versions. All other parts/hardware swap over.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
06-09-2013, 07:39 PM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Silver Spring Md.
Posts: 4
|
Re: 1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes
Quote:
Drums are a wear item anyway and mine are due for a turning/brake job. Any reason not to spend the extra $20 x 2 plates; and get new drums? (any downside to this other than some initial cost?) Thanks! |
|
06-09-2013, 07:43 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
|
Re: 1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes
Yes, the bolt pattern for the plates is the same. Where did you find the 'correct' backing plates for $20?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
06-09-2013, 08:19 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Silver Spring Md.
Posts: 4
|
Re: 1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes
|
06-09-2013, 08:24 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
|
Re: 1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes
Ok... for used parts that's about right. I've done this swap on 3 of my trucks now. Increases friction contact area by 35%.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
Bookmarks |
|
|