The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board > Squarebody Projects and Builds

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2013, 07:19 PM   #1
spacetransient
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Silver Spring Md.
Posts: 4
1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes

Does anyone know what is involved in swapping out drums/shoes from the 11" x 2" drums/shoes to the 11-5/32 drum & 2-3/4" shoes? Inside specs are almost identical. Wheels are the same 5x5.

Drums are deeper of course but otherwise, what would be the problem with a swap? I would really like to use the larger pads if I could!

Thanks for any responses
spacetransient is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 07:32 PM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Re: 1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes

The backing plates, drums, & shoes are different between the two versions. All other parts/hardware swap over.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 07:39 PM   #3
spacetransient
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Silver Spring Md.
Posts: 4
Re: 1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
The backing plates, drums, & shoes are different between the two versions. All other parts/hardware swap over.
So is the bolt pattern for the backing plate the same? If so this would seem to be a simple swap- the backing plates are only like $20

Drums are a wear item anyway and mine are due for a turning/brake job.

Any reason not to spend the extra $20 x 2 plates; and get new drums?

(any downside to this other than some initial cost?)

Thanks!
spacetransient is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 07:43 PM   #4
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Re: 1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes

Yes, the bolt pattern for the plates is the same. Where did you find the 'correct' backing plates for $20?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 08:19 PM   #5
spacetransient
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Silver Spring Md.
Posts: 4
Re: 1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
Yes, the bolt pattern for the plates is the same. Where did you find the 'correct' backing plates for $20?
$20 each- Junk yard of course

Still- anything I can do to extend brake life is worth it to me.

Many thanks!!
spacetransient is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 08:24 PM   #6
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Re: 1986 1/2 ton Rear Brake- 2-3/4" vs 2" Shoes

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacetransient View Post
$20 each- Junk yard of course

Still- anything I can do to extend brake life is worth it to me.

Many thanks!!
Ok... for used parts that's about right. I've done this swap on 3 of my trucks now. Increases friction contact area by 35%.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com