08-16-2012, 09:45 PM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 25
|
Re: Rear Gear Ratio?
|
08-16-2012, 11:51 PM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: rock springs wyoming
Posts: 182
|
Re: Rear Gear Ratio?
It all depends on what you are using the truck for. my 82 with 4" lift and 33 i have 3.73 you might want 4.10 if it a daily drive. if its a play toy 4.56 or more. where is your power band on your motor. and the speedo gear you will have toplay with that it tok me three tries to get mine right.
|
08-17-2012, 06:28 PM | #28 | |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
Re: Rear Gear Ratio?
The simplest way to remember the "High/Low" gear thing is about "speed".
Low gears accelerate quickly....but the top speed is limited by engine RPM. "Quick" and "Fast" are not the same thing. Low gears= low speed High gears= high speed There are trade-offs each way for going too far away from the ideal gear, which is generally determined by tire diameter. You have some lee-way based upon your intended use, but not much. If you go too "low", your highway RPM my be too high...especially if you are a speeder This is not only bad for fuel mileage, it's not necessarily good for anything else either. If you go too "high", acceleration suffers. This causes you to push the pedal harder....once again, not good for fuel mileage. It also seems sluggish and heavy. You might think that this low RPM on the highway would counter-balance this by giving you mileage gains, but that is not necessarily so either.....especially with a carburetor. They get confused in the transition between idle circuits and the main jets. It can be even worse with an over-drive automatic transmission, they don't like that either.
__________________
You can review the site's rules here. Quote:
Bad planning on your part does not necessarily constitute an instant emergency on my part.... The great thing about being a pessimist is that you are either pleasantly surprised or right. |
|
08-17-2012, 07:44 PM | #29 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prescott, Arizona
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: Rear Gear Ratio?
Quote:
A 3.73 with only a 28" tire and a 1:1 trans gear,,,,you can cruise at 65 mph at only 2800 rpms. With an overdrive you could knock that down to the 2000 rpm range easily. If you are going to run a taller tire then that 3.73 becomes a very lazy gear. I'd step that up to a 4.10 at the very least, maybe more if you really go crazy on that tire size. |
|
10-09-2013, 04:09 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lake George, NY
Posts: 30
|
Re: Rear Gear Ratio?
When driving my 67 C10 at 60 mph the tach says 4000 rpm and the motor sounds like its around 4000 rpm. 29" tires. The ratio should be in the 5s. Too much for a daily driver.
I pulled the differential cover and the gears are 41-11, 3:73 ratio. The trans is a 3 speed case number 8925647. I think if the clutch was slipping I would smell it. Something doesn't add up. Any ideas? Thanks, retired guy. |
10-09-2013, 06:53 PM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: holton, in
Posts: 28
|
Re: Rear Gear Ratio?
I have 4:10 in my c-30 and was going to go to a 3;54 in the next couple weeks with the turbo 400 have same size tires as you. Was thinking about an over drive next spring. do you think the overdrive would be over kill? Only do occasional light to med towing
__________________
5 out of 4 people have trouble with fractions |
10-09-2013, 07:16 PM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lake George, NY
Posts: 30
|
Re: Rear Gear Ratio?
A 3:73 with 200-4R that I am going to install reduces the ratio to 2:50 or so. With 29" tires that's 69mph at 2000 rpm. About the same as our 2010 Impala. It gets 30+mpg highway. Your 4:10 might be OK with a OD transmission.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|