Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-21-2013, 01:03 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa
Posts: 74
|
opinions on this blazer
found this on craigslist yesterday. its been eating at me ever since. i haven't called about it at all...but i'm just now starting to search for a blazer from this era so don't know much about prices or anything. figured i'd ask the professionals before i wasted too much time on it. my plans would be to eventually put it on air ride and make it more of a weekend cruiser than a true show car
http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/cs...197462332.html |
11-21-2013, 01:17 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Space Coast, Fl.
Posts: 1,055
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
Just my opinion but If it's not too far you NEED to go see it. Depends on the rust if it's a deal or not.
__________________
Dad always said, "Son, WISH IN ONE HAND, and ......." -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- Current toy trucks: '71 GMC 1500 SUPER CUSTOM short/step, orig. dk. blue, 350/700r, ps,pb, A/C '72 Blazer 2wd, ochre & white, 454, tremecTKO 500 5spd. ps, pb, A/C, tilt Last 10yrs of hobby vehicles, had a FEW more in the 50yrs. before these: '66 Plymouth Belvedere City of Miami cop car clone. '70 Nova 406"sb, 13.5-1, solid roller, Brodix, p.glide/t.brake, back halved, 9" Ford, spool 4.88, cage,ladder bar/coilover, 10.5 tire....... SOLD!! '67 C10 short/step side mount spare -- SOLD!! '72 Jimmy 2wd, 350/350, ps, pb, fun driver, lots of bondo & a shiny red paint job..... SOLD!! '69 Nova 350, 4spd, A/C, ps, p.b, ...SOLD!! |
11-21-2013, 04:25 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bangor pa
Posts: 1,223
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
Is says it was put on a Camaro frame so its not a stock 2 wheel drive. The price isn't too bad if its not rusted and the interior is there. It appears to be in ok shape though. Having a non rusted body and frane to start with makes it worth a lot more to me after doing a ton of rust repairs. Putting it on bags may be a problem with the Camaro frame but then you just buy Camaro parts to do it.
Last edited by Chulisohombre; 11-21-2013 at 04:35 PM. |
11-21-2013, 04:56 PM | #4 |
2WD Jimmy
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Davis County, Utah
Posts: 2,565
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
I wouldnt touch it.
|
11-21-2013, 06:37 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa
Posts: 74
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
any reason tom? or you just going to leave it at that?
|
11-21-2013, 07:18 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 386
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
its someone aborted project... i would walk away....
__________________
Ed will be known as the Tiger Woods of the integration business |
11-21-2013, 07:44 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 672
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
Its amazing how little effort he has gone into describing it. tells you it has a motor, but lets you just guess as to whether it runs, or is even complete.
Usually the less they say the less they want you to know... that being said, if your looking for a slammed 2wd-converted blazer project it might be for you. I am not a huge fan of the "Layin' on da frame" look but to each their own. You really got to look at it to fill in the story, as you can only see about 10% of what your getting into by looking at the photos. All I can tell you on the interior is that it might have a red dash and it has a steering wheel. That's a good start i suppose? |
11-21-2013, 08:21 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bangor pa
Posts: 1,223
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
How it was put on that frame will be a big issue of if its worth it as well. Hack job or custom from a shop will make a big difference. Either way you slicè it it is sitting on a rolling chassis. If the tub is good you can always find a good stock frame to throw it on and put it back to stock. Check the vin it says c10 but if it is cke starting number it would be a k5 4 wheel drive on that frame. It worth what you are willing to pay. Just look at everything real good that they did and make sure it is safe before anything else you do. If you aren't mechanically inclined take someone who is or have it safety inspected at a shop. Then at least you know what you got.
Last edited by Chulisohombre; 11-21-2013 at 08:27 PM. |
11-21-2013, 08:47 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: PENDLETON,INDIANA
Posts: 271
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
I would have to see it it could be a diamond in the rough
but i would be exceptionally doubtful odds are after looking at it for 15 mins i would run like the wind does blow |
11-21-2013, 11:07 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 341
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
It looks like he has a few c10's. Are you looking for a Factory 2wd Blazer?
|
11-22-2013, 12:44 AM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sanger, CA
Posts: 415
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
I Agree with others regarding the fab job. It looks like a decent price as long as the floorboards and bed isn't rotted through. Figure on just buying it for the tub not running. You could find a good solid k5 frame later. The frame swap could've been a quick sloppy job. My question is why not use the original frame? If you can get it cheap enough and find a good solid frame then you'll have a good start.
__________________
71 K5, AC/Tilt, 4" lift 33" tires 5.3L/4L60E/NP 205 (Under Construction) 05 Dodge 2500 4x4 5.9 Cummins (Daily driver) "Common sense is not so common" My build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=555879 |
11-22-2013, 08:09 AM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bangor pa
Posts: 1,223
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
Looking at the Add And thinking About It. If it is just the subframe from a Camaro, the blazer frame is Maybe still There and the two wheel drive camaro front end could be just bolted to the stock frame with custom brackets. The rest of the Camaro was unibody was it not? If so this might not be as bad as I was thinking. If you Look at it get some good pics Underneath and please post here so we can see what was done.
|
11-22-2013, 10:08 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Clear Lake, Iowa
Posts: 74
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
thanks for all the replies guys. there aren't many of any of these blazers around here that i can find(even 4wd). i will try getting ahold of him and seeing what kind of information i can get out of him.
splash, it doesn't have to be a factory 2wd. i'd be changing the whole suspension anyway so a 4wd conversion wouldn't bother me. this one is just the closest to me that i can find |
11-22-2013, 02:15 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 233
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
Looks like the front clip has been cut through the fenders maybe to tilt the front end? It also has 5 lug rear end, I'm pretty sure 70 2wd blazers would have had 6 lugs.
|
11-23-2013, 07:33 PM | #15 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 341
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
Quote:
|
|
11-24-2013, 05:13 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bangor pa
Posts: 1,223
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
Two wheel drives were 5 lug. 1/2 ton 4x blazers 6 lug and one ton and 3/4 8 lugs. They have the same wheel pattern as the cars five lug. Just a little bigger spacing.
Last edited by Chulisohombre; 11-24-2013 at 05:19 PM. |
11-24-2013, 05:23 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bangor pa
Posts: 1,223
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
Good call on the tilt hood. On my phone I didn't even notice the cut in the fenders til you mentioned it.
|
11-24-2013, 06:03 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 233
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
Not trying to be argumentetive about lug patterns but I found the link below. http://www.gmheritagecenter.com/docs..._Full-Size.pdf I also looked at a couple of factory 70 2wd 1/2 ton that were six lug. It seems to have been a GM oddity and was changed to 5 lug (5x5) in 71. There are also a couple of threads about it on the site.
Mike |
11-24-2013, 07:11 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bangor pa
Posts: 1,223
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
I never knew that. Thanks for the info. I thought my buddys 68c10 was 5 lug too. All original gmc with the 305 v6. This guy could have possibly swapped in the camero rear end to keep the lug pattern the same. It looks more and more he used the whole chassis from the car. That's probably why the wheels tuck so far under the wheel wells front and rear.
|
11-24-2013, 07:20 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Creighton Sask. Canada
Posts: 4,121
|
Re: opinions on this blazer
It seems a bit..off. I would at least go look at it, if you have the skills could be a cool build, it is different already, at least look then you won't have to wonder.
__________________
1987 Green n Green machine. 5.0 4spd std. 7" lift w 35's. |
Bookmarks |
|
|