Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-14-2003, 05:23 PM | #1 |
Overworked and Underlaid
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Flagstaff,Arizona
Posts: 1,279
|
OT:Emissions questions regarding the readings on a particular car
ok on my taurus which i will be driving when i start my truck swap project here soon.i now have some questions regarding its emissions readings.it will be registed at my dad's po box in northern arizona where they dont require emissions so i wont have to spend a bunch of money on the car(more money for the truck-woohoo).basically i want to know what could be the cause of the following readings to be so high.here goes the results
equipment or pressure inspections gas cap-pass evap components-the paper says there inaccessible-wth does that mean-the inspector is blind and cant see but next to that it says ok-im stumped on this one. emissions inspections results hydrocarbons(hc) in grams/mile-vehicle reading 2.05 applicable standard 1.00-car failed there carbon monoxide(co) in grams/mile-vehicle reading 25.09 applicable standard 12.00-car failed there oxides of nitrogen(nox) in grams/mile-vehicle reading 2.88 applicable standard 2.50-car failed there im not going to run it through emissions for now as i said b/c it would cost more money than im willing to spend right now-it would cost me in total like 5 or 6 hundred dollars to get it to pass the emissions test here.please give me some idea of what components and/or systems are at fault so i can at least repair the major items.the car runs now as it is but it doesnt run properly so i want it to at least run better so it dont give me fits for the time i have to drive it.thanks in advance guys.
__________________
I'd rather push a Chevy than drive a Ford The Beast-1978 C10 LWB Red-1978 C10 LWB (Uncle Mike)Michael Henry Millett 11/5/1957 to 03/08/2012 Gone but will never be forgotten-RIP (Uncle Chuck)Charles Manning Gulbronsen Sr 1956-2012 Taken from us to soon but you will live on in our hearts-RIP |
12-14-2003, 05:29 PM | #2 |
Robert Olson Transport
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: recent transplant to NC USA
Posts: 20,310
|
just before i go to any emmissions inspection i tune the car up new plugs wire cap rotors air and fuel filters and ive never failed yet ya sure its just not out of tune? youre really not that bad on those tests
__________________
Bob 1951 International running on a squarebody chassis "If a man's worth is judged by the people he associates himself with, then i am the richest man in the world knowing some of the fine people of this board" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a...t.php?f=25&a=9 (you can review the site rules here!) PM Me for your vehicle/parts hauling needs in the North East US or see my Facebook page Robert Olson Transport Live each day to the fullest.. you never know when fate is going to pull the rug out from under you... I hate cancer!! |
12-14-2003, 05:35 PM | #3 |
Overworked and Underlaid
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Flagstaff,Arizona
Posts: 1,279
|
im not sure exactly what is wrong with this car thats why i was asking for opinions on the subject.im sure a tune up wouldnt hurt it but for readings that high i suspect it needs more than a tune up.
__________________
I'd rather push a Chevy than drive a Ford The Beast-1978 C10 LWB Red-1978 C10 LWB (Uncle Mike)Michael Henry Millett 11/5/1957 to 03/08/2012 Gone but will never be forgotten-RIP (Uncle Chuck)Charles Manning Gulbronsen Sr 1956-2012 Taken from us to soon but you will live on in our hearts-RIP |
12-14-2003, 06:34 PM | #4 |
You get what you pay for
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 4,798
|
It's fuel injected and the computer is controlling everything. It looks like you have a handful of crap to guess at what's wrong. I wouldn't have any idea where to start though. Unless you have access to a diagoistics computer, you will end up spending a ton of money trying to replace what it could be. This is why I hate the computer controlled vehicles.
__________________
Mike 1985 Chevy C-10 |
12-15-2003, 05:15 PM | #5 |
Keep it gangsta!
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Peoria, Arizona (Phoenix Area)
Posts: 102
|
I had a 1990 Taurus GL, had 181,000 on the clock, ran like new, just traded it for a new Taurus.
You got a decent car there. I hate to say this, but you need to pull some codes. Make sure your timing is ok before you go. Only make timing adjustments with the gray connector at the dist. unplugged, It's called a SPOUT connector. Run some fuel injector cleaner through. Like everyone else says, put some motorcraft plats (correct gap) and a cap and rotor set on it. The emissions people are blind at the inspection station by the scottsdale airpark.
__________________
1984 K5 Blazer 305-NP208-700R4 Ex Police Unit It's old school, but moves along nicely... '78 C-20 - SOLD |
12-15-2003, 07:14 PM | #6 |
Overworked and Underlaid
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Flagstaff,Arizona
Posts: 1,279
|
thanks for the tips guy.elwood it was tested at the emissions station in apache junction or the one on greenfield north of the brown rd in east mesa.the ex had it tested but she has another car so she dont drive but im going to drive it while my trucks are down.looks like its time for ol dad to bust out his ford code reader he got one when he had his 87 mudstain oops i mean mustang.the taurus isnt a bad little car actually but i would like to get this problem with it resolved so i can sell without hassle after my truck is done.
__________________
I'd rather push a Chevy than drive a Ford The Beast-1978 C10 LWB Red-1978 C10 LWB (Uncle Mike)Michael Henry Millett 11/5/1957 to 03/08/2012 Gone but will never be forgotten-RIP (Uncle Chuck)Charles Manning Gulbronsen Sr 1956-2012 Taken from us to soon but you will live on in our hearts-RIP |
Bookmarks |
|
|