The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2014, 04:32 PM   #1
Savidio44
Registered User
 
Savidio44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Chapin South Carolina
Posts: 66
Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

I would like some opinions whether you prefer headers or stock manifolds on your trucks. I have had experience with headers over the years and have the normal complaints about leaks,rusting, ugly appearance etc. I have ceramic coated Hedmann's in my Camaro and they have been great. But they generate a tremendous amount of heat under the hood which is objectionable. Just wondering because I am going to build a '69 C-10 and headers / stock manifolds is one of the decisions. Seems to me I don't really need high horseposwer/ high RPMS on a street driven truck so why shouldn't I just ceramic coat the exhaust manifolds and go on? Your thoughts please.
Savidio44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 04:39 PM   #2
72 K20
Registered User
 
72 K20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Brandon,Iowa
Posts: 391
Re: Headeers vs Stock Manifolds?

There are several threads on this very subject in the archives. Use the search function and you will find tons of info and opinions on the headers vs stock manifolds .
Have a great day ! Welcome to the board !
72 K20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 05:00 PM   #3
leddzepp
Moderator
 
leddzepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 19,995
Re: Headeers vs Stock Manifolds?

Manifolds
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed.

1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck.


RIP ElJay
RIP 67ChevyRedneck
RIP Grumpy Old Man
leddzepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 05:05 PM   #4
kwmech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colfax-California
Posts: 8,480
Re: Headeers vs Stock Manifolds?

My vote would be for the manifolds also
kwmech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 05:26 PM   #5
vidman
Registered User
 
vidman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fitchburg,Mass
Posts: 737
Re: Headeers vs Stock Manifolds?

Stock manifolds..
__________________
62 Willys 4wd Pickup : 72 C-10 swb 504 stroker 09 Taco 3" lift 33" tires: 90 K-5 blazer (plow truck): RIP Ross Little brother
vidman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 05:52 PM   #6
Stocker
20' Daredevil (Ret)
 
Stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,576
Re: Headeers vs Stock Manifolds?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Savidio44 View Post
I don't really need high horseposwer/ high RPMS on a street driven truck
Stock manifolds, for the same reason.
__________________
- Mike -

1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205

RIP El Jay
Stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 06:08 PM   #7
DGulliver
Registered User
 
DGulliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Southern TN
Posts: 227
Re: Headeers vs Stock Manifolds?

Another vote for stock manifolds, for your purposes.
__________________
'72 Chevrolet Step Side 350/TH350, '63 C10 Step V8
'74 Trans Am 400, '80 Trans Am Indy Pace Car
Mercedes AMG S55, SLK230 Kompressor, GL450
'96 Dodge Indy Ram Official Indy Truck
'99 Porsche 911 Carrera
DGulliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 06:30 PM   #8
Tillik
Registered User
 
Tillik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Layton, Utah
Posts: 186
Re: Headeers vs Stock Manifolds?

Stock Manifolds
__________________
James B.
1967 Chevy Fleetside Shortbed 4X2 (Black & Beautiful)
1971 Chevy Fleetside Shortbed 4X4 (White & Rough)
Tillik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 06:38 PM   #9
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: Headeers vs Stock Manifolds?

I personally dislike the performance of a stock manifold. The headers do put off a large amount of heat, but if you get the ceramic or jet coated, that limits that heat. I have a set of ceramic coated Cyclones in my 84 GMC 383 stroker engine and they have been there for many years and still look good. My daily driver 2011 GMC Sierra has a set of jet coated Kooks headers, I have a set of jet coated Doug Thorley headers setting in the basement to go into the 68 Chevy C-10 truck/ LS engine, when I get it put together.

It is not the high RPMs, but the general application of daily driving that I do and the headers give me a better control of the intake and exhaust flow for the engines in them.
__________________
Frank
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 11:30 PM   #10
Rod Run
Registered User
 
Rod Run's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 777
Re: Headeers vs Stock Manifolds?

Headers all the way!
__________________
______________________
www.northeastrodrun.com
Rod Run is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2014, 11:34 PM   #11
67ctener
Registered User
 
67ctener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Arlington Washington
Posts: 1,808
Re: Headeers vs Stock Manifolds?

Depends the route your going. On my motor I wouldn't put anything but header but if you have a mild/stock motor I'd keep it the way gm built it and run manifolds. I would have them ceramic coated, nothing looks worse to me then rusty manifolds IMO
67ctener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 02:04 AM   #12
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

There's no doubt that headers make a little more power that manifolds on mild engines, but ram horns are a pretty efficient manifold. Here is a dyno test showing the difference between ram horns and headers on a mild 383 stroker. http://www.chevytalk.org/fusionbb/sh...hp?tid/256915/ The headers in this test were probably a little on the big side for the engine combination, but headers normally don't make more than a 10 HP difference at the most on street engines, and often they make less than 10 HP difference. For me, its worth giving up that small gain on a regularly driven street car/truck to not have ton deal with the noise, heat, ground clearance issues, loose bolts - and worst of - leaks of a header. Its too easy to gain back that 10 HP somewhere else (if I felt like I absolutely needed it) than put up with all the negatives of headers.

The higher the level of HP the engine is putting out, the more headers help. With that said, there are a lot of cars running in the F.A.S.T (Factory Appearing Stock Tire) and Pure Stock Muscle Drags classes that are running unbelievable times with stock manifolds in place, because the rules dictate it. There are cars making close to 600 HP in that series with manifolds. One thing that helps tremendously with a high HP engine with manifolds is a camshaft with a longer lope separation (LSA), of 112 degrees or more. Cams with tighter LSA along with very long duration lobes don't work as well since they need the exhaust scavenging of a longer primary tube runner which is typical with long tube tubular headers. A smaller duration cam and decent amount of lift with a wider LSA will make power broader range, idle better (more vacuum for power accessories), and can actually allow you to run higher compression with pump gas because the wider LSA helps lower the dynamic (cranking) compression ratio. That's why factory performance cars have always (and still do) use this type of cam. All of the LS engines are the rage these days run the type of cams I am talking about - moderate duration, a lot of lift, and a wide LSA. That's a big part of why they are able to produce a big numbers with stock manifolds.

Again, to be clear, I am not saying headers don't make more power than manifolds. What I'm saying is that manifolds are capable of producing much more power than the average street engine will ever see.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 07:44 AM   #13
GRX
Registered User
 
GRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,937
Re: Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

Same old responses ... Manifolds for reliability. Headers only if your engine will make use of them.
__________________
1969 c-10 Step Side Long Bed. I-6 250cid = = 1969 Pontiac GTO hard top. 400, 4-speed.
GRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 08:26 AM   #14
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GRX View Post
Same old responses ... Manifolds for reliability. Headers only if your engine will make use of them.
Yep, pretty much, except you can go very fast with manifolds if you wish!
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 01:10 PM   #15
oldcane
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: murfreesboro, tn
Posts: 109
Re: Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

I've always gotten a little better mileage with headers on stock engines, enough to notice. When towing I notice the mileage more.
oldcane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 03:25 PM   #16
1972MarkW
Registered User
 
1972MarkW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Whiting, IA
Posts: 126
Re: Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

Depends on what you plan to do with your truck,personally I would go with
Stock manifolds .I went with stock on my truck with original motor and drive train.350 V-8 with 3.07 rear end,great combination.
1972MarkW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 04:02 PM   #17
Fitz
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 2,183
Re: Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GRX View Post
Same old responses ... Manifolds for reliability. Headers only if your engine will make use of them.
Headers when no "stock" manifolds were ever made for your engine!
Attached Images
 
Fitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 04:24 PM   #18
Lattimer
Registered User
 
Lattimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Mickleton, NJ
Posts: 1,776
Re: Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

I like headers for the look under the hood. Plus my truck is not original, and I don't feel like trying to source manifolds and make the exhaust fit them.

If you use good gaskets and the right bolts, you can keep the headers from leaking.
__________________
Shawn

1970 Chevy C-10 SWB, 350, TKO 600 5 speed
My build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=559881
Lattimer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 05:01 PM   #19
MARKDTN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,142
Re: Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

Manifolds
__________________
'83 K20-TPI
'73 C10
'79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD)
'07 Tahoe(Son driving)
'14 Suburban-DD
'71 C10-current project
MARKDTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 07:03 PM   #20
69GMCLonghorn
Registered User
 
69GMCLonghorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Porter Ranch, CA
Posts: 978
Re: Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

I don't think it does matter what you're going to do with it. Headers are still the better option unless you're building a 100% original truck (and why the hell would you do that? They're not worth that much!).

The heat isn't a big issue. I have never run anything but regular steel Heddman (or Summit) cheapo headers. As long as the plug wires are out of the way and tied up, what's the problem??
69GMCLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2014, 07:43 PM   #21
engineer_gregh
Registered User
 
engineer_gregh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Smyrna TN
Posts: 1,153
Re: Headers vs Stock Manifolds?

I'm running ceramic coated headers from Summit on my BB 402. I'm not to far from you, Smyrna if you want to take a look sometime.
engineer_gregh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com