|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-15-2014, 10:01 AM
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 315
|
Suburban Body 4WD vs 2WD
IS the Suburban body the same for 1964 4WD and 2WD? I know the frame is different. There may be an opportunity for me to pick up a 2WD complete. The body appears in pictures to have a lot less rust and rot than mine so I was thinking of taking a closer look. If it's in better shape I would like to swap the body over to mine. Easy swap or a lot of modifications?
|
|
|
|
05-15-2014, 10:46 AM
|
#2 |
|
Never Ending Projects
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,836
|
Re: Suburban Body 4WD vs 2WD
Don't quote me 100% but I do think the bodies are the same. Mounting points are the same. Frames are different but have the specific mounting point to fit the body. Only thing that might be different in the bodies could be the center hump. I think 4x4 had the high hump, to help clear the transfer case. 2WD, though can have the high hump, I think they were more common with the low hump.
__________________
. 1965 C10 Panel,  Tiki Express http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=506580 SOLD1968 Chevy C10, Long, Fleetside, Hot Rod Hauler http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=313233 SOLD 1965 Chevy C10, Long, Fleetside, Hot Rod C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=415702 SOLD We were given two ears and one mouth for a reason... listen twice as much and speak half as often... |
|
|
|
05-15-2014, 12:11 PM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 792
|
Re: Suburban Body 4WD vs 2WD
You are 100% correct... same and all came with high humps
|
|
|
|
|
05-15-2014, 11:47 PM
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 315
|
Re: Suburban Body 4WD vs 2WD
Thanks for the information guys. I'll let you know if I get it. With pictures of course..
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
