The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-2014, 05:07 PM   #26
GRADYS Performance
Registered User
 
GRADYS Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Columbus, Oh
Posts: 366
Re: 350 Starter holes drilled incorrectly?

Bolting the Torque Converter up to the Flexplate should not move the Flexplate at all. Modifying the starter gear may not get the results you want.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gibson View Post
Cool - I'm going to do one last set of measurements tonight after I get the converter bolted back up and torqued down just so I have the block-to-flexplate gap documented. I measured it last night with the flexplate free, and it was right around .5 - so already a bit too far out based on ron's measurements. That is only going to get farther when torqued down, so I'm a bit worried already. We shall see!
GRADYS Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2014, 10:40 PM   #27
Gibson
Registered User
 
Gibson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 132
Re: 350 Starter holes drilled incorrectly?

Well, it is confirmed. Stacking tolerances (and possibly a bur or some debris) seem to be at the root of this problem.

I was fortunate enough to get some help from a long time mechanic and auto vocational teacher tonight. He confirmed that the flexplate looked correct, as did the mate between crank and flexplate and block and bellhousing. Also he checked the converter clearance, and it was within spec. After torquing down the blots on the converter, there was no shift in the flexplate location. I now suspect there might have been a piece of trash or something where the converter mates up which was part of the cause of the excessive flexplate runout (the gap between starter and flexplate is STILL on the large side, but not as bad as it was when the flexplate was bolted up before)

Tonight we mounted an OEM style starter which appears to have enough throw for proper engagement. Gradys was right about modifying the gear - that won't work. The flange on the back is what the thrust bearing/fork thingy pushes against. Instead, I will go with what Powermaster support suggested and machine the body of the starter a bit. It would still need to be modified to work properly.

For now, I'm just going to enjoy being able to start it with the OEM style starter!

Thanks to everyone for the help! If someone runs into this in the future and has this same problem, I would recommend they first unbolt the converter from the flexplate, ensure proper converter/flexplate clearances, and torque things back down to spec and see where they are. Also, try an OEM style starter first and make sure the problem still exists.
Gibson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com