Options: 6 cyl SWB's Vs BB LWBs. - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

CST10 · 09-13-2014, 09:33 PM

Just wondering?

If you had the choice between two trucks and condition of both is equal which would you pick.

It's between a 6 cylinder, 3 on the tree, SWB truck or a BB automatic LWB truck.

Just a question I have struggled to answer myself. I know SWB truck command a premium price and usually BB trucks do too.

Remember, This is more a matter of personal opinion rather than Value.

Blue GMC · 09-13-2014, 11:55 PM

BB LWB already has the motor I want and body work costs the same can save some money

**special-K** · 09-14-2014, 08:40 AM

I buy what I like,so it would depend on which one I'd rather have t the time. I don't get excited over big blocks. In fact,the big block deters me. So,I'd take the SWB 6cyl. My preference in long beds is C/20s and shortbeds is SWB anyway,not that I wouldn't have a long C/10

CST10 · 09-14-2014, 09:26 AM

I'm in kinda the same spot. If not going to use as a daily driver then BB LWB gets my vote. If I plan to drive it a lot the the 6 cylinder SWB gets it. I'm not too hung up on one or the other.

Although I will say that a 6 cylinder SWB with 3.73:1 gears get about 12-15 mpg according to a few buddies who own them. Maybe they don't have them tuned right. I get 10-11 mpg with my BB LWB.

I bought mine not for the BB but because I like LWB trucks. Like my grandpa taught me. If you can't put a 4X8 sheet of plywood and close the tailgate without it hanging out it's not a practical truck to own for work.

CST10 · 09-14-2014, 09:28 AM

By the way, I am looking for a SWB truck to fix up, I like them all is my problem. Lol

09-13-2014, 09:33 PM	#1
CST10 Registered User Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Gonzales, La Posts: 1,441	Options: 6 cyl SWB's Vs BB LWBs. Just wondering? If you had the choice between two trucks and condition of both is equal which would you pick. It's between a 6 cylinder, 3 on the tree, SWB truck or a BB automatic LWB truck. Just a question I have struggled to answer myself. I know SWB truck command a premium price and usually BB trucks do too. Remember, This is more a matter of personal opinion rather than Value. __________________ MyToys: Goldilocks the "Ol School Survivor" 1968 C10, SWB Stepside, 08/15 TOTM, 250 CI 6 cylinder, 3 on the tree, 3.73 rear, 3/5 static drop, 23,500 original miles. Samson the 1970 CST10, LWB, 462Ci, Turbo 350 tranny, 3.08 rear gear, PB, PS, A/C, AM/FM, 2/4 Drop. Brutus the 1998 Camaro Z28, 33,500 original miles, LS1, 519 RWHP/497 RWTQ. Member of the Louisiana Classic Truck Club, LCTC Member of the Louisiana C10 Club Member of the Baton Rouge Drifters Car Club

09-13-2014, 11:55 PM	#2
Blue GMC Registered User Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Olathe, KS Posts: 384	Re: Options: 6 cyl SWB's Vs BB LWBs. BB LWB already has the motor I want and body work costs the same can save some money

09-14-2014, 08:40 AM	#3
special-K Special Order Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Mt Airy, MD Posts: 85,862	Re: Options: 6 cyl SWB's Vs BB LWBs. I buy what I like,so it would depend on which one I'd rather have t the time. I don't get excited over big blocks. In fact,the big block deters me. So,I'd take the SWB 6cyl. My preference in long beds is C/20s and shortbeds is SWB anyway,not that I wouldn't have a long C/10 __________________ "BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~

09-14-2014, 09:26 AM	#4
CST10 Registered User Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Gonzales, La Posts: 1,441	Re: Options: 6 cyl SWB's Vs BB LWBs. I'm in kinda the same spot. If not going to use as a daily driver then BB LWB gets my vote. If I plan to drive it a lot the the 6 cylinder SWB gets it. I'm not too hung up on one or the other. Although I will say that a 6 cylinder SWB with 3.73:1 gears get about 12-15 mpg according to a few buddies who own them. Maybe they don't have them tuned right. I get 10-11 mpg with my BB LWB. I bought mine not for the BB but because I like LWB trucks. Like my grandpa taught me. If you can't put a 4X8 sheet of plywood and close the tailgate without it hanging out it's not a practical truck to own for work. __________________ MyToys: Goldilocks the "Ol School Survivor" 1968 C10, SWB Stepside, 08/15 TOTM, 250 CI 6 cylinder, 3 on the tree, 3.73 rear, 3/5 static drop, 23,500 original miles. Samson the 1970 CST10, LWB, 462Ci, Turbo 350 tranny, 3.08 rear gear, PB, PS, A/C, AM/FM, 2/4 Drop. Brutus the 1998 Camaro Z28, 33,500 original miles, LS1, 519 RWHP/497 RWTQ. Member of the Louisiana Classic Truck Club, LCTC Member of the Louisiana C10 Club Member of the Baton Rouge Drifters Car Club

09-14-2014, 09:28 AM	#5
CST10 Registered User Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Gonzales, La Posts: 1,441	Re: Options: 6 cyl SWB's Vs BB LWBs. By the way, I am looking for a SWB truck to fix up, I like them all is my problem. Lol __________________ MyToys: Goldilocks the "Ol School Survivor" 1968 C10, SWB Stepside, 08/15 TOTM, 250 CI 6 cylinder, 3 on the tree, 3.73 rear, 3/5 static drop, 23,500 original miles. Samson the 1970 CST10, LWB, 462Ci, Turbo 350 tranny, 3.08 rear gear, PB, PS, A/C, AM/FM, 2/4 Drop. Brutus the 1998 Camaro Z28, 33,500 original miles, LS1, 519 RWHP/497 RWTQ. Member of the Louisiana Classic Truck Club, LCTC Member of the Louisiana C10 Club Member of the Baton Rouge Drifters Car Club



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.