11-21-2014, 05:24 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2
|
Airride vs Static
Hey everyone, some of you may know me through instagram and from the Git-Down this weekend. For that that don't, my name is Chaz. I've been a for member for a few months now, haven't posted anything until now though.
To the topic in the subject title. Airride vs static... I have a '72 bowtie lwb 2wd and I'm planning a major suspension overhaul on it this coming year. It's already lowered with cut coils and shackles (leaf spring rear, obviously) and I'm just curious of the pros/cons of airride on these trucks vs those of static/coilover setups.
__________________
Only |
11-21-2014, 10:00 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 210
|
Re: Airride vs Static
Depends on how you will be using the truck and your budget. Metal is less expensive and tried and true. Air ride costs more upfront and requires a bit more care. We have a stock ride height full air ride setup with auto level. The biggest mistake we made was starting out with cheap fittings from airbagit.com (don't buy any of their stuff). 17k miles in I have now replaced every single one of their fittings and nylon hose with dot airline and brass ptf fittings designed for semi trucks brakes and bags. Point being you need the money to buy the good stuff upfront.
The advantage of air ride is an amazingly smooth ride.
__________________
71 C-20 Custom Camper California Truck |
11-21-2014, 10:28 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2
|
Re: Airride vs Static
Oh, I definitely am aware of Airbagit/Chassistech. I'm not planning to run cheap crap, I want names like Ridetech and Accuair to grace this thing since I plan to drive it and enjoy it. I won't be daily driving it once this is done, but I plan to drive it locally and possibly across state lines for the Brothers show and other big shows here in the southwest. So I definitely know what you're saying about cheap parts and issues with it. Also why I don't want it laid completely out, I want it to stance it low for show, but still be able to be driven if it leaks out to 0psi for whatever reason. That leads me to my next question, who has used Ridetech Shockwave bags and Accuair management systems? What the tricks and known issues with their products? Also I'm looking for the same info for Porterbuilt stuff, drop members, etc.
__________________
Only |
11-21-2014, 11:21 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,774
|
Re: Airride vs Static
Look into the PB stage 1 front, stage 2 rear if you don't want to lay frame. That's the route I'm going. Adding the Accuair e-level and possibly ridetech HQ shocks if there's still some room in the budget. I'm expecting the truck to sit, ride and handle great.
__________________
Ryan 1967 Red Stepside..."Laymond" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...40#post6441840 1972 Medium Olive SWB-Chester http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=759628 1967/71 Blue SWB C10..SOLD 1977 SWB K10..my grandpa's.....never should have sold |
11-22-2014, 02:04 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Arlington Washington
Posts: 1,808
|
Re: Airride vs Static
I was in the same boat as you. I went 4/6 and it just wasn't low enough for me... I thought about squeezing another inch and going 5/7 but then you run into issues such as alignment, clearance, and bottoming out. So why not go bags? The ride is outstanding, the adjustability is only with bags, drive it low and show park it even lower. Best bet is go pb stage 1 and accuair switch speed. I personally wouldn't waste money on e level with this mild of a kit but that's just my opinion.
__________________
Scott 67 c10 sold 89 c1500 90 k2500 91 s10 #chevyonly |
11-22-2014, 09:47 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Huntsville Ontario Canada
Posts: 4,051
|
Re: Airride vs Static
After owing a truck without ride height sensors I would never bag a truck without using the ride height sensors. I love the simplicity of my Accuair system.
__________________
1968 Suburban numbers matching all original truck now equipped with 6.0/4L80 on Accuair http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=625017 1967 C/20 6.0/4L80 Roofing Truck 1990 V2500 Suburban "Plow Truck" 2005 TAHOE DD |
11-22-2014, 05:22 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 61
|
Re: Airride vs Static
Sorry to jump onto this thread but i think it is relevant.
I know with Airride you have air bags instead of springs. I understand there is the slammed look IE deflated however is there then a "driving" height ? or does it just go to max lift? I guess what i am saying is if you have say 6" of travel can you just set it where you want it and drive? |
11-22-2014, 05:59 PM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: kingston ont Canada
Posts: 443
|
Re: Airride vs Static
Quote:
|
|
11-22-2014, 06:02 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 3,844
|
Re: Airride vs Static
Quote:
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------- Jason. 68’ GMC shortbox https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=794201 72' 2WD Blazer http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=425385 67' LongBox C-10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=691845 InstaGram ybnorml67 |
|
11-22-2014, 06:41 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 210
|
Re: Airride vs Static
We used a Dakota Digital system that allows in cab height adjustments on the fly with three preset ride heights (push button dump), full dump, and full inflation Running stock height my 2600 lbs bags are about 45 psi in the rear and 60 psi in the front. I currently have it set for low = 1" lower and high=1" higher. During normal driving I only really use the high while running dirt roads when extra clearance is needed. The thing to be conscious of is the impact on alignment when changing ride heights.
__________________
71 C-20 Custom Camper California Truck |
11-22-2014, 07:34 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 32
|
Re: Airride vs Static
whats the difference in Accuair's e-level and switchspeed systems?
__________________
72 C10 swb LS 5.3 LSA Blower/4l60 performabuilt 01 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 |
11-22-2014, 09:13 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,774
|
Re: Airride vs Static
E-level has ride height sensors at all 4 wheels to keep the truck at the preset level.
__________________
Ryan 1967 Red Stepside..."Laymond" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...40#post6441840 1972 Medium Olive SWB-Chester http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=759628 1967/71 Blue SWB C10..SOLD 1977 SWB K10..my grandpa's.....never should have sold |
11-22-2014, 10:42 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wheeling, Illinois
Posts: 703
|
Re: Airride vs Static
From what I've read e level is set it & forget it, if you pick up your buddy or load the back corner of the bed the e level self adjusts it back to the preset level.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|