Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-21-2012, 03:22 AM | #26 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bell Gardens Ca
Posts: 151
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
12-21-2012, 03:32 AM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,018
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Dual setup is exactly like the quad setup, just no separate high beams. Quad setups, when on high beam, have the outers on their high beam filament (just like duals) and add supplementary high beams so there is 4 lamps lit.
|
12-21-2012, 03:32 AM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bell Gardens Ca
Posts: 151
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Ok now that I'm starting to understand it's best to use some relays to have the light work brighter on one of the post it said that 10.5v is based out the socket and with relays you'd get12v is that cause theres a voltage compositor or something since the previous owner used a internally regulated alt. And canned the voltage regulator since it servers no purpose cause of the swap
Posted via Mobile Device |
12-21-2012, 03:42 AM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,018
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
The lesser voltage is from resistance drop of 20+ feet of insufficient wire Gauge and oxidized 40 year old contacts in connectors and the switch. Putting in relays shortens the path and the number of contact points. I will say however that use good quality relays, I had relays put in in my Suburban to keep all 4 beams lit on high ('91 had funky headlights with single filament low beams, odd size too). Had to trace them down and remove them because they would strobe an bumpy roads. Worst headlights of any vehicle I ever owned, and no option to really replace them with anything.
|
12-21-2012, 08:01 AM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 282
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
I will be upgrading the lights on my '69 to use lenses that accept H4 bulbs, but I'm going to run HID bulbs. I agree that blue lights are not the best, and most people associate HID with blue, but it's not necessarily the case. If you get HIDs with a kelvin rating of 4000-5000, your light will be mostly white, and very bright. (OEM HIDs on high-end cars are around 4200K or so) The ricer boys and whatnot usually run the 12,000K or higher, which emits a blue to purple light, which is junk for driving, and all for show.
HID kits usually have relays in them and are often times as easy as plugging one of your 3-prong connectors directly to it, and then +12V and ground. Actually easier than hooking up mulitple relays yourself.
__________________
1972 C10 "Shop Truck" Build - EFI, 5-speed, Posi, and Patina http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=834292 1957 Chevy pickup - Twin Turbo 5.3/NV3500, Jag IFS & IRS, AirRide http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=606987 Check me out on YouTube - "Tiny Garage Fabrication" http://www.youtube.com/oneoffstroker |
12-21-2012, 09:11 AM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,018
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Um, HID means High Intensity Discharge, which means no filament, which means it takes a high frequency inverter. It's not just a bulb you plug into an H4 reflector. Also color temperature is dictated by the material that the vaporized metal is and there are limited metals that can be effectively vaporized to make a HID capsule. HID has way more in common with a fluorescent tube than with a light bulb.
The real advantage to HID is in lumens per watt, and the ability to reduce packaging size to smaller form factors as new vehicles have smaller frontal areas. In two 7 inch reflectors or four 5 1/4 inch reflectors mounted in a vehicle with a frontal shape of a brick there isn't a lot of compelling reasons to use HID, especially when Halogen is far cheaper, produces a color temp that the human eye distinguishes shapes much better in and if done right can produce more usable light than is safe for oncoming drivers without really trying very hard. I never understand what the fascination with HID on an old truck is. If a HID system is not specifically adapted for a particular vehicle it creates all kinds of ghosting, glare back, inappropriate aiming problems, and annoying glare to oncoming drivers and throws their vision out of night vision mode. Wavelengths in the bluish range are the worst color range for human night vision. You will never see night instrumentation of any aircraft, or combat vehicle with blue illumination, it's very hard to focus on and adjust too in dark conditions. Aviation instrumentation is usually red or amber which are very easy colors to adapt to when surroundings are dark. I love the marketing BS about it being closer to daylight, under which it is common to wear eye wear that specifically blocks out what? Blue wave lengths, it is the blue wavelengths in daylight that cause the glare on your windshield, it the wavelengths that tinted windshields are designed to reduce. Why on earth would you want to specifically produce those troublesome wavelengths to drive by at night? |
12-21-2012, 09:14 AM | #32 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Center City, MN, USA
Posts: 3,254
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Quote:
Quote:
A simple test with your stock wiring is to turn on the lights then measure voltage with a volt meter at the back of the headlights. Its been years since I did it but it was on the order of 10.4 volts. Which is why your stock headlights have a yellow glow. I bought my relays at Checkers in a bubble pack for around $5 each. The wire I got from Menard's, a local home improvement chain. If you really want to be trick, go to NAPA and order a handfull of part number 725147. This is the little brass colored insert that GM put in most female connectors of this vintage. With a little flat blade screwdriver in the front of the connector you can depress the little tang and pull the wire out of the back of the black connector. Clamp a 725147 on to your 12 gauge wire, and slide it back in the headlight connector. This connector is called a Packard Type 56 and is used in so many places on this truck that I stock them so I'm not always running to NAPA for more. The male connector is part number 725145. The female looks like this:
__________________
'70 cab, '71 chassis, 383, TH350, NP205. '71 Malibu convertible '72 Malibu hard top Center City, MN |
||
12-21-2012, 03:22 PM | #33 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Russiaville
Posts: 203
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Nice article about headlights:
Lots of useful information on this site!! http://www.madelectrical.com/electri...adlights.shtml
__________________
......its not what your askin', its what your gettin'.... .......every time I screw up, I learn something. Needless to say, I'm learning all the time............ |
12-22-2012, 12:44 AM | #34 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bell Gardens Ca
Posts: 151
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
12-22-2012, 12:47 AM | #35 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bell Gardens Ca
Posts: 151
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
|
12-27-2012, 07:52 PM | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bell Gardens Ca
Posts: 151
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Ok so I found a place that sells a updated hd wire harness for my headlights and I'm wondering how would I bypass the horn wire relay since the whole horn set up was canned by the previous owner
Posted via Mobile Device |
01-04-2013, 06:09 PM | #37 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bell Gardens Ca
Posts: 151
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Posted via Mobile Devicefinally got my headlight from the filling station now that ive tried to install them I realized my buckets dont fit for these lights has anyone ever installed these and how much fab work needs to be done for the bucket and rings to work or should I return them
Posted via Mobile Device |
01-04-2013, 06:18 PM | #38 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bell Gardens Ca
Posts: 151
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Posted via Mobile Device
|
01-04-2013, 06:41 PM | #39 |
20' Daredevil (Ret)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,728
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Can you post pics - or a link - or describe which lamps you bought?
__________________
- Mike - 1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205 RIP El Jay |
01-04-2013, 06:48 PM | #40 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bell Gardens Ca
Posts: 151
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
They are auto loc 7in snake eyes
Posted via Mobile Device Posted via Mobile Device |
01-04-2013, 07:01 PM | #41 |
20' Daredevil (Ret)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,728
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
I have not heard of them, and unknown brands can be a crapshoot at best when it comes to performance & quality. I Googled it and found one review on Amazon, said it was Chinese and appeared to be poor quality. I guess you could trim the bucket like 67cheby did on page 1 (post #16). Your choice, but I would return those and do as I said in post #4 -- stick with a brand-name European E-code.
Here's one source for Hellas http://www.rallylights.com/detail.aspx?ID=739.
__________________
- Mike - 1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205 RIP El Jay |
01-04-2013, 08:05 PM | #42 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,018
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
|
01-04-2013, 08:09 PM | #43 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 73
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
I'll second that. Cibie is my brand of choice, and from what I understand, much better than Hella or other H4 headlamps. One of their big advantages is tighter vertical separation between low beam and high beam. In other words, when the low beam is aimed properly, so is high beam. Hella H4 lamps have a lot more vertical separation, which puts the high beams in the treetops when low beam is aimed correctly, or puts the low beam too low when high beams are where you want them.
Cibie lamps also offer a much wider, much more even spread of light on low beam than Hella headlamps do. This is increasingly important if you are doing anything more at night than driving very slowly in a very straight line... You do pay more for Cibies, but you absolutely get what you pay for. They WORK. Anyway, pardon the intrusion. I am new here, but not completely wet behind the ears. Stocker is my dad...he never did teach me to dry behind my ears.
__________________
'85 Jeep J20 OMFT (old man fishing truck), 66K original miles - all the good Chevy/GMC stuff around here was taken! Last edited by DarkMonohue; 01-04-2013 at 08:25 PM. |
01-04-2013, 08:51 PM | #44 |
20' Daredevil (Ret)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,728
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
skorpioskorpio: I didn't know they were still in business.... another source for Cibies (and a bit cheaper) is
http://www.danielsternlighting.com/p.../products.html. DarkMonohue: Welcome to the site! I agree with your choice of Cibie over Hella, and for the same reasons.... but I often mention Hellas instead, simply because they are easier to find, and less costly. For those who don't mind paying a little more, I believe Cibie to be the better choice. I sometimes wish Marchals were still available. Those were excellent lamps and I'd like to see how they measure up to Cibies. mikey2409: Did you do the relay mod yet? That's pretty much a necessity for any headlamp upgrade, no matter which lamps you decide on.
__________________
- Mike - 1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205 RIP El Jay |
01-04-2013, 09:27 PM | #45 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PNW
Posts: 73
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Thankyou, thankyouverymuch. Long time listener, first time caller, etc. etc.
Quote:
The relay install is a definite upgrade, well worth the minimal time and outlay involved regardless of which headlamps you choose.
__________________
'85 Jeep J20 OMFT (old man fishing truck), 66K original miles - all the good Chevy/GMC stuff around here was taken! |
|
01-04-2013, 10:59 PM | #46 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,018
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
[QUOTE=Stocker;5796178] I sometimes wish Marchals were still available. Those were excellent lamps and I'd like to see how they measure up to Cibies.
QUOTE] The last series of Machals were far and away the best standard E2 lamps made, razor sharp cutoffs, prestine focus, street signs exploded with light way down the road, even large side of the road freeway signs that were fairly far off the shoulder. There is a reason why back then it was the lights on virtually all Dakar and Le Mans cars. Both Marchal and Cibie ended up utimately being owned by the same company (Valeo) and the Cibie line was retained and the Marchal line eventually dropped although the auxillery lights were retained for a while as OEM products and some were folded into the Cibie line. I think the Marchals were more expensive to manufacture, cut quarts crystal lenses, and the reflectors were more prone to dulling than the Cibies. Each of these is a marked improvement over the prior: Stock Tungsten sealed beam (DOT) Halogen sealed beam (DOT) Cibie H4 Bobi (DOT sealed reflector, replaceable bulb) Hella H4 crowned lens (E2 and DOT motorcycle) Hella H4 flat lens (E2) Cibie H4 crowned lens (E2 and DOT motorcycle) Cibie H4 flat lens (E2) Marchal cowned lens (E2) Marchal Amulux split reflector (E2) [rare and big bucks!] Each step is a marked improvement over the former. Comparing the last to the first makes the first look like a couple old flashlights taped to the front of the vehicle. BUT... like I said earlier in this thread, initially the E2s might make you a bit queezy at first, any bounce in your suspension you will see in your lighting horizon and more so the better the lights are. The last ones on the list have a razor sharp horizon with about a 30 degree ramp up from center to the right side road edge. I'll say one thing, you put great well focused headlights on your vehicle and one of the first things you notice is the sheer volume of wildlife that crosses the road ahead of you that you've never known has been there and left before you've ever had enough light to see them. You will also notice that there is way more signs on the side of the road than you remember, because usually at night they are there and gone before they register, and during the day there is too much else distracting you. |
01-05-2013, 12:42 AM | #47 |
20' Daredevil (Ret)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,728
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
I remember the Marchal Ampilux.... a long time ago I got a set of Marchals (single reflector) and a friend got Ampilux double reflectors. We wired his low beams to come on with the highs. Amazing lamps.
__________________
- Mike - 1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205 RIP El Jay |
12-12-2014, 05:12 AM | #48 |
Old member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Liberty, & Garden City S.C. , U.S.
Posts: 19,945
|
Re: debating and questioning headlights
Here is the link for my lights! A little late though!http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=630581
__________________
1971 LWB Custom, 6.0LS & 4L80E, Speedhut.com GPS speedometer & gauges with A/C. 20" Boss 338's Grey wheels 4 wheel disc brakes. My Driver Seeing the USA in a 71 Upstate SC GM Truck Club 2013,14 and 2016 Hot Rod Pour Tour http://upstategmtrucks.com/ Get out and drive the truck this summer and have some fun! It sucks not being able to hear! LWB trucks rule, if you don't think so measure your SWB! After talking to tech support at Air Lift I have found out that the kit I need is 60811. Per the measurements I gave them. Ride height of truck inside spring and inside diameter of springs. |
Bookmarks |
|
|