![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
PROJECT 7DEUCE
![]() Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: GRANTS PASS OR
Posts: 21,606
|
Re: Porsche 944: Actually there is a substitute
Any updates?
__________________
GO BIG GREEN ![]() MEMBER #6377 72 k-5 daily driver 6'' lift 35'' 350-350-205 slowly getting rust free. Project "7DEUCE" check out my build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=267665 Tim Powell..R.I.P EastSideLowlife..... R.I.P.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Fallbrook, CA
Posts: 910
|
Re: Porsche 944: Actually there is a substitute
Thanks for checking in French. No progress but not dead is about all I can say. When I do get back on it I'll work on the IRS stuff. Trying to mate the Ford diff with the 944 swing arms. I'll also be trying to gather more info about the CARB rules here in California and whether I can realistically make it to approval if I modify the intake and exhaust as much as I would like to. If not then I have two other options. 1) "sell" the car to an Oregon relative and then buy it back and bring in as an out of state car that can pass emissions. 2) Rig it with L36 RWD stock components, get the CARB sticker and then swap in the L67 gear. I want the car to be legit as far as polluting goes - just don't understand why it's bad to change plumbing as long as it still passes emissions.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|