The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > All 4x4 Tech & Off Roading

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2015, 06:11 PM   #26
BigRed76
Registered User
 
BigRed76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,921
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

ORD emailed me back today, they said they don't make a 2.5" shackle flip for the 67-72 trucks because they weren't comfortable with the strength because of how much higher the shackle mounts are in relation to the frame. If you look at the 4" shackle flip bracket for 67-72 you can see that the shackle mount just barely hangs down below the frame, so to do a 2.5" shackle flip it would put the shackle mount almost directly beside the frame rail.
__________________
Zach

1970 Chevrolet Custom Camper K20
1971 GMC Super K2500, 12V/NV4500 swap in progress
1971 Chevrolet Custom C10
1972 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe C20, 5.3/4L60E
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, 455/TH400, 3.73 posi
2004 GMC Sierra 2500HD, LB7/Allison, CCSB
2005 GMC Sierra 1500, 5.3/4L60E, CCSB

BigRed76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2015, 04:22 AM   #27
y5mgisi
Second Chance Program
 
y5mgisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,642
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

I have yet to find the stock leaf spring rates. But here is a table that lists several leaf spring rates.

http://coloradok5.com/springratetable.shtml

My plan for my 78 k25 is the 2" tuff country ez ride front springs, and hafl ton pickup springs from 98-2000 chevy/gmc pickup. They are 63" long and if you have ever ridden in a truck like that, you know they ride amazing for a fullsize pickup. And the fact is, its a factory leaf spring designed to be used in a pickup. They are obviously lighter duty since they were OE in a half ton, but hafl ton srping capacity is good for most folks. Heck my 2012 GMC 1500 has only 3 leafs but is rated to tow like 9500lbs. It rides amazing as well.

So, ez ride springs, good shocks, and longer rear springs and i think i'll have the best possible combo of smooth ride but still good stability.

Also, not sure about the 67-72 stuff, but TnA offroad offers a zero lift shackle flip for the 73-87(91) crowd.

http://www.totallynakedauto.com/GM_A...ift_shflip.htm
__________________
90 Chevy Suburban 2500 5.3 swap/th400/np241/14bltSF/10blt.
77 C20 crew cab Silverado. 396/th400. In work.
y5mgisi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2015, 08:49 AM   #28
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

You can always add air lift auxiliary springs (bags) to get it back to 3/4-1t rating when needed.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2015, 03:18 PM   #29
El Dorado Jim
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: El Dorado Ca
Posts: 3,374
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

Nice truck you have! I have a 72 K20 that I put a 2 1/2" skyjacker lift kit on with skyjacker shocks,the kit came with new front springs and rear lift blocks,came with the old style rear U bolts, I went to a local spring shop and had them make me the newer style 73 and newer U bolts and I used plates from a 74 K20 ( just a U bolt reversal,so U bolts point up, not down).......any way, the truck rides real nice and I am running 33" tall tires , looks good too..... I have heard that Tuff Country EZ ride kits are really good too....
El Dorado Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2015, 09:32 PM   #30
BigRed76
Registered User
 
BigRed76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,921
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

Well I think I'm going with a 4" lift. I've got a pair of brand new 4" tuff country EZ ride springs in the garage for another project, so I think I'll try those on the GMC first and see how I like them before I pull the trigger on putting 52s on it. Thank you for all of your input guys
__________________
Zach

1970 Chevrolet Custom Camper K20
1971 GMC Super K2500, 12V/NV4500 swap in progress
1971 Chevrolet Custom C10
1972 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe C20, 5.3/4L60E
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, 455/TH400, 3.73 posi
2004 GMC Sierra 2500HD, LB7/Allison, CCSB
2005 GMC Sierra 1500, 5.3/4L60E, CCSB

BigRed76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 12:06 AM   #31
joeydurango
Registered User
 
joeydurango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 827
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

I can tell you that the worn out stock springs on my truck were a smoother ride than the new 2" TC EZ-Ride lift springs (although for a lifted, all leaf truck, the ride is pretty nice). I would be curious to find out how smooth new, stock-height springs ride.
__________________
1972 K10 Cheyenne Super | LWB, fleetside | 350/350/205 | KEEPER
1971 K10 Cheyenne | SWB, fleetside | LS Swap 5.3/4L60 | SOLD
1976 Trans Am | 400/4-spd | SOLD
1976 Trans Am | 455/4-spd | TOTALED
joeydurango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 01:10 AM   #32
y5mgisi
Second Chance Program
 
y5mgisi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,642
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

Were your stock springs two leaf or three? Its hard to believe even though several of you have said it, that the tuff country ez rides ride worse than stock when they have by far the lowest spring rate compared to all the other off the shelf springs.

I am wondering if any of it has to do with the pre '73 front springs being 46" as opposed to the post '73 having 48" front springs.
__________________
90 Chevy Suburban 2500 5.3 swap/th400/np241/14bltSF/10blt.
77 C20 crew cab Silverado. 396/th400. In work.
y5mgisi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 09:28 AM   #33
joeydurango
Registered User
 
joeydurango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 827
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

I don't honestly remember. But remember, they were quite worn out and pretty saggy, so a fairer comparison would be between new stock springs and new lift springs. Also, as I believe Tim said above, the taller the arch, the rougher the ride, although I haven't looked at the spring rates.
__________________
1972 K10 Cheyenne Super | LWB, fleetside | 350/350/205 | KEEPER
1971 K10 Cheyenne | SWB, fleetside | LS Swap 5.3/4L60 | SOLD
1976 Trans Am | 400/4-spd | SOLD
1976 Trans Am | 455/4-spd | TOTALED
joeydurango is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 11:22 AM   #34
K5owner
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 168
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

If you are looking for comfort some custom springs are the way to go. They won't be cheap but they will give you the best possible ride in a leaf sprung truck. Alcan comes to mind but there are others.
Honestly I am not that impressed with the ride quality of my EZ-Rides in my square body. They do flex better than the pro-comps I had before but around town ride a little softer but not much. Also the procomps held loads better when carrying stuff to the dump or a load of gravel. Something to consider.

Last edited by K5owner; 03-09-2015 at 11:41 AM.
K5owner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2015, 11:55 AM   #35
95 S_Trucker
Registered User
 
95 S_Trucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 2,187
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by K5owner View Post
If you are looking for comfort some custom springs are the way to go. They won't be cheap but they will give you the best possible ride in a leaf sprung truck. Alcan comes to mind but there are others.
Honestly I am not that impressed with the ride quality of my EZ-Rides in my square body. They do flex better than the pro-comps I had before but around town ride a little softer but not much. Also the procomps held loads better when carrying stuff to the dump or a load of gravel. Something to consider.
I think anything would be softer than pro comp springs. I had front and rears on my 85, and that thing rode like a brick. It was a good thing that truck had a headliner, because my head hit the roof quite often. That being said, I didn't lift it to go off road, I lifted it mainly for looks. And those pro comp springs served their purpose.
95 S_Trucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 03:57 PM   #36
BigRed76
Registered User
 
BigRed76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,921
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

So just an update, I decided to hold off on lifting the truck for now. Instead I bought bilstein shocks and new stock springs for the front. The truck does ride much much better, but it'll still let you know you're in a solid axle truck.

On a side note, a few weeks ago I drove a 68 F250 that had 52" springs up front and that thing rode like a dream. No sway bar, no trac bar, just the springs and some good shocks. I will definitely be doing the 52" springs in the future.
__________________
Zach

1970 Chevrolet Custom Camper K20
1971 GMC Super K2500, 12V/NV4500 swap in progress
1971 Chevrolet Custom C10
1972 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe C20, 5.3/4L60E
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, 455/TH400, 3.73 posi
2004 GMC Sierra 2500HD, LB7/Allison, CCSB
2005 GMC Sierra 1500, 5.3/4L60E, CCSB

BigRed76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 06:28 PM   #37
snj8198
Registered User
 
snj8198's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Star Valley, WY
Posts: 2,038
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

Thanks for the update Zach
__________________
Steve
1971 GMC Longbox. Full Roller Stroker 489 w/ FiTech EFI, Chris Straub Cam/NV4500/205/D60/14B w. Grizzly Locker and 4.11's. 2" Lift on 33's
snj8198 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 08:18 PM   #38
Stocker
20' Daredevil (Ret)
 
Stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,722
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRed76 View Post
a few weeks ago I drove a 68 F250 that had 52" springs up front and that thing rode like a dream. No sway bar, no trac bar, just the springs and some good shocks.
Hope you remembered which shocks they were.... they will make a big difference in ride quality & control.
__________________
- Mike -

1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205

RIP El Jay
Stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2015, 09:49 PM   #39
BigRed76
Registered User
 
BigRed76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,921
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stocker View Post
Hope you remembered which shocks they were.... they will make a big difference in ride quality & control.
I believe they were Monroe shocks, completely yellow but had no stickers on them.
__________________
Zach

1970 Chevrolet Custom Camper K20
1971 GMC Super K2500, 12V/NV4500 swap in progress
1971 Chevrolet Custom C10
1972 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe C20, 5.3/4L60E
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, 455/TH400, 3.73 posi
2004 GMC Sierra 2500HD, LB7/Allison, CCSB
2005 GMC Sierra 1500, 5.3/4L60E, CCSB

BigRed76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2015, 02:07 PM   #40
rocket20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Omaha NE
Posts: 63
What if someone was trying to accomplish a 6" lift with 52s up front a 2" lift spring I think would accomplish this required amount of lift , and a lift spring (in theory ) would be stiffer than stock 52 and couldn't said spring have a better road manner? And still accomplish a softer ride?
Posted via Mobile Device
rocket20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2015, 12:09 AM   #41
'63GENIII
Registered User
 
'63GENIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Carlos, Ca.
Posts: 3,048
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRed76 View Post
So just an update, I decided to hold off on lifting the truck for now. Instead I bought bilstein shocks and new stock springs for the front. The truck does ride much much better, but it'll still let you know you're in a solid axle truck.

On a side note, a few weeks ago I drove a 68 F250 that had 52" springs up front and that thing rode like a dream. No sway bar, no trac bar, just the springs and some good shocks. I will definitely be doing the 52" springs in the future.
I just finished my 63" / 52" swap and am still giddy about the way it rides. The front is fairly straightforward. The rear took a little figuring. It was worth it to me.
__________________
Chris


'63 k15 long step
Vortec 7.4 - L29 Blackbear tune, Five 0 Motorsports injectors, Chris Straub Cam, NV4500, divorced 205
52" front and 63" rear spring swap
D44 / 14bff - disc axles
Milemarker 9K and 10.5K hydraulic winches

63" & B52 Spring Install http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ng+swap+thread


NV4500 Reverse Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=reverse+build

L29 - 7.4 Vortec Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...&highlight=L29
'63GENIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2015, 07:26 PM   #42
rocket20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Omaha NE
Posts: 63
Quote:
Originally Posted by '63GENIII View Post
I just finished my 63" / 52" swap and am still giddy about the way it rides. The front is fairly straightforward. The rear took a little figuring. It was worth it to me.
What bilsteins were they running ?
Posted via Mobile Device
rocket20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2015, 07:50 PM   #43
'63GENIII
Registered User
 
'63GENIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Carlos, Ca.
Posts: 3,048
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocket20 View Post
What bilsteins were they running ?
Posted via Mobile Device
I think BR76 is running the Bilstiens. Ive got RS9000s.
__________________
Chris


'63 k15 long step
Vortec 7.4 - L29 Blackbear tune, Five 0 Motorsports injectors, Chris Straub Cam, NV4500, divorced 205
52" front and 63" rear spring swap
D44 / 14bff - disc axles
Milemarker 9K and 10.5K hydraulic winches

63" & B52 Spring Install http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ng+swap+thread


NV4500 Reverse Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=reverse+build

L29 - 7.4 Vortec Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...&highlight=L29
'63GENIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2015, 08:43 PM   #44
BigRed76
Registered User
 
BigRed76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,921
Re: Best ride quality, Stock or Lifted?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocket20 View Post
What bilsteins were they running ?
Posted via Mobile Device
I'm using bilsteins for a stock height 73-87, since the only bilsteins I found for a 67-72 were for lifted trucks. The front shocks are a direct fit, and the rear shocks I just had to remove the studs that come preinstalled in the upper bushings.
__________________
Zach

1970 Chevrolet Custom Camper K20
1971 GMC Super K2500, 12V/NV4500 swap in progress
1971 Chevrolet Custom C10
1972 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe C20, 5.3/4L60E
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, 455/TH400, 3.73 posi
2004 GMC Sierra 2500HD, LB7/Allison, CCSB
2005 GMC Sierra 1500, 5.3/4L60E, CCSB

BigRed76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com