The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1988 - 1998 GMT400 Chevy & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2016, 10:37 PM   #1
cam.man67
Registered User
 
cam.man67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Jefferson, MD
Posts: 2,397
Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

While my Dart has been my daily for years, I find that I'm using my GMC more and more. Darn it! It just drives so good!

Problem is, I'm struggling with fuel economy in this truck. For reference, my '69 and '79 C10s averaged 9 and 10mpgs respectively...without efi, OD, or any sort of good aerodynamics. My GMC gets 11. I don't use the a/c hardly ever (unless driving my wife), I rarely haul (and even when moving 11000lb hay wagons, I got 10mpg), I mostly drive on the highway and am not aggressive at all on the throttle. The tires are aired up to 40psi, the truck runs great, and yet it is positively sucking down fuel. What can I do to improve this?

Since I've owned it (last September), it's gotten a TPS, plugs, wires, cap and rotor, new brakes, and a R134 top off. I'm really shooting for about 15mpg around town...is that unrealistic???
__________________
'68 Dodge Dart 270, 225, 904, 2.76--"Lucy"
1996 Gmc 1500 Z71, 350, 4l60e, 3.73s
1995 Jeep Wrangler Rio Grande 2.5, AX5, 4.10s
1989 Toyota Pickup 22re, auto, 3.73
cam.man67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2016, 06:32 AM   #2
speedygonzales
Registered User
 
speedygonzales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Smithfield, VA
Posts: 1,501
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

I've owned mine since new December 1998. Obviously the way you see it now, it's not the best for mileage. I gave up trying to get better fuel eco from a CSFI years ago. Other than a good state of tune. You can't do much. Not talking about letting leaks and problems go. Obviously those need attention.

http://ecomodder.com/forum/EM-hyperm...ecodriving.php

BTW not sure if you know that the front O2s and the coil are considered tune up items. They can help with mileage obviously.

Changing tranny, transfer case and rear end lube can help slightly.
__________________
99 Z71 (98 body style)
Pride and joy
speedygonzales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2016, 06:48 AM   #3
72freak
Rottenwood Garage Member
 
72freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 4,321
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

My 99 Z71 Tahoe hovers between 12-16. I saw 17 once on a highway trip.Changing tire size can also hellp a little.

Driving V-8's and concerning your self with fuel economy is really a wasted effort. These vehicles are not made for fuel economy.In my opinion anything that came from the factory that gets under 20 MPG is NOT a vehicle to worry about fuel economy. If you need fuel economy buy a vehicle made for such. I have a Honda Accord, A Subaru Forester and a ZTW Focus wagon and those are econo boxes. I get the biggest kick out of folks that ask someone in a hotrod or V8 truck..."what kind of gas mileage you get"...
__________________
2004 Chevrolet Suburban C1500
2001 Chevrolet 2500HD Crew 6.0
1999 Harley Davidson Electra Glide
1972 Chevrolet C-20 Custom Camper "Dump Truck"
1972 Chevrolet C-20 Suburban "Big Green"
1969 Chevrolet C-50 Wedge Hauler "Leonidis"
1966 C-10 2x4 short fleet 327 4 speed "Race Truck"
1952 Plymouth Cranbrook "Rican" (my grandfathers)
1931 Ford Model A Coupe "Black Beauty"
1930 Ford Model A truck "Club Cab" 4x4


Rottenwood Garage and Speed Shop.....where everything must be racy!

It's not just a hobby..It's a LIFESTYLE!!!

Thanks for nothing Barrett-Jackson

You cant fix stupid or teach accountability!


Time wasters, looky Lous and tire kickers are everywhere!
72freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2016, 08:06 AM   #4
95 S_Trucker
Registered User
 
95 S_Trucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 2,187
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

15 around town is out of line.

When these were new(1/2 ton, 4wd, 5.7), they were EPA rated at 12(city) and 16(highway at 55 mph) and those numbers are generous.


Go buy a 1000 dollar beater car, it will get good mileage and pay itself off.

I had a 94 olds achieva that got 26 mpg. It paid itself off in 7 months.


A pick up is used to haul and tow. Its not meant to get good mileage.


Please let us know when you tow 11,000 pound hay wagons. I don't want to be anywhere near you. You need a 1 ton+ truck or a tractor. That's too much weight to tow on a half ton, especially on a trailer without brakes.
95 S_Trucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2016, 03:37 PM   #5
Tom
driving is in my blood
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,763
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 95 S_Trucker View Post
15 around town is out of line.

When these were new(1/2 ton, 4wd, 5.7), they were EPA rated at 12(city) and 16(highway at 55 mph) and those numbers are generous.
s.
So your saying 4wd removes 4mpg city and 5mpg freeway from the 2wd rating? Because I still have my window sticker for my 1/2ton 2wd extended cab 5.7L/auto and I'm rated 16/21.

OP- 15mpg around town might be at the high end, but 15mpg with you driving mostly freeway like you stated certainly is not.

When I bought my 98 at 75,000 miles, it would pull 22mpg on the freeway. It still runs great, and I've changed plugs, wires, cap+rotor but I've never done the coil, 02's, or installed the new style fuel injection setup. All that along with 100,000 more miles means I'm getting 18-19mpg freeway now. I'm assuming if I do the rest of the maintainence I'll get some MPG's back.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle.
-98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes.
-02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front
-CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis
DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me.
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2016, 04:48 PM   #6
cam.man67
Registered User
 
cam.man67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Jefferson, MD
Posts: 2,397
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

Thanks for the tune up comments...I wasn't aware that the o2 sensor and coil could affect that. Going another track, are any of the handheld programmers of any use organizing for economy?
__________________
'68 Dodge Dart 270, 225, 904, 2.76--"Lucy"
1996 Gmc 1500 Z71, 350, 4l60e, 3.73s
1995 Jeep Wrangler Rio Grande 2.5, AX5, 4.10s
1989 Toyota Pickup 22re, auto, 3.73
cam.man67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2016, 08:08 PM   #7
68C15
blood type; Retumbo
 
68C15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

my 99 Tahoe with 3.42 gears, 18 HWY, 16 if pulling my boat. In town I have no idea
__________________
Man rule #77...if you own a 67 stepside with a caddy 472 you will never be in danger of loosing you man card
68C15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2016, 09:17 PM   #8
HeavyChevy81
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: West Texas
Posts: 30
Cool Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

My 97 Reg SWB 4x4, Vortec 350 gets 20-21 on the highway to work, but falls to 14-15 around town. Ive done a lot of experimenting on it though. 3.42 rear gears, factory sized tires 265/75r-16.
Mods include:
ECM conversion to 0411. More resolution in Tuning
I use HP Tuners software to make my tweaks
New front O2's every 50k miles (currently 182000)
Cap, rotor, plugs and wires about every 25k

After LOTS of experimenting, and exhausting all kinds of theories in the fuel map, timing curves, TQ mgmt, etc. the biggest secret to better MPG's is...
tuning the Transmission. yep, I have made more forward progress with trans pressures, shift points and especially tuning the TCC timing.

I have played with the O2's rich/lean curve.
I have played with timing all over the place (keep the Active timing control Active)
I did see some improvement when calibrating my MAF.
But, again, my biggest improvement other that Right foot modulation, has come from transmission and Torque Converter Clutch application tuning.

Just my opinion.
HeavyChevy81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2016, 10:34 PM   #9
pwdcougar
Registered User
 
pwdcougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,332
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

Quote:
Originally Posted by speedygonzales View Post
BTW not sure if you know that the front O2s and the coil are considered tune up items. They can help with mileage obviously.
What brand O2 sensors do you recommend Speedy?

Paul
__________________
"You know that little thing in your head that keeps you from saying things you shouldn't? Yeah well, I don't have one of those"
1969 Mercury Cougar Standard 4 speed
1969 Mercury Cougar XR7 convertible
1970 4WD Chevrolet Suburban
1997 4WD Chevrolet Silverado Extended Cab Short Bed (purchased new January 1997)
pwdcougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2016, 06:41 AM   #10
speedygonzales
Registered User
 
speedygonzales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Smithfield, VA
Posts: 1,501
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

Standard motor products makes most OEM sensors. I get them from Summit.

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/smp-sg454

I had the back ones programmed at the same time I had the EGR programmed out.

After I get concrete in the garage and finish my bathroom project, I'm gonna do my ramjet 383 project. New management system from FAST the whole she-bang. LOL
__________________
99 Z71 (98 body style)
Pride and joy
speedygonzales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2016, 10:49 AM   #11
pwdcougar
Registered User
 
pwdcougar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,332
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

Quote:
Originally Posted by speedygonzales View Post
Standard motor products makes most OEM sensors. I get them from Summit.

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/smp-sg454

I had the back ones programmed at the same time I had the EGR programmed out.

After I get concrete in the garage and finish my bathroom project, I'm gonna do my ramjet 383 project. New management system from FAST the whole she-bang. LOL
Thanks Speedy. Does this one on ebay look like the same one? Says Standard brand and the correct number.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-STANDARD...1V0jn7&vxp=mtr

Paul
__________________
"You know that little thing in your head that keeps you from saying things you shouldn't? Yeah well, I don't have one of those"
1969 Mercury Cougar Standard 4 speed
1969 Mercury Cougar XR7 convertible
1970 4WD Chevrolet Suburban
1997 4WD Chevrolet Silverado Extended Cab Short Bed (purchased new January 1997)
pwdcougar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2016, 06:58 AM   #12
speedygonzales
Registered User
 
speedygonzales's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Smithfield, VA
Posts: 1,501
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

Id say it's the same one
__________________
99 Z71 (98 body style)
Pride and joy
speedygonzales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2016, 09:36 AM   #13
Palf70Step
State of Confusion!

 
Palf70Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 48,486
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

My ole 96 2wd GMC extended cab average 14 around town and 18-21 on highway, AC always on. If you are running all highway, close the darn windows and run the AC, it actually improves the MPG. Another thing to remember is the fuel. In 96 there was no ethanol. That 10% ethanol will drop your MPG 10% or more which is around 2MPG highway.

As was mentioned, if you want MPG, driving a V8 truck is not the way to get it. To get the comfort, and convenience of my trucks, I deal with the MPG. If I wanted MPG, I'd be driving the CRV and look like a yuppie nerd... (of wait I am a nerd)
__________________
Bill
1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside
2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD

Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC)

Bill's Gallery
Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift.
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!
Palf70Step is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2016, 10:37 AM   #14
OutlawDrifter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Northeast KS
Posts: 1,803
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palf70Step View Post
I'd be driving the CRV and look like a yuppie nerd... (of wait I am a nerd)
Haha, Bill, you crack me up!


All of the above is good advice, don't drive a pickup for fuel economy. Keep it tuned up and enjoy the ride.
__________________
1999 GMC Suburban K2500 SLT, 454/4L80E
1991 Z/28, 6.0L/T56
1949 GMC 250, S10 Frame, 6.0L/4L80E

Instagram @aceshighspeedshop
OutlawDrifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2016, 04:07 PM   #15
Tom
driving is in my blood
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,763
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

Nobody drives a truck for economy yet I fail to see how that matters with trying to get the best the vehicle is capable of? Its a worthy goal IMO.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle.
-98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes.
-02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front
-CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis
DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me.
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2016, 04:26 PM   #16
OutlawDrifter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Northeast KS
Posts: 1,803
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
Nobody drives a truck for economy yet I fail to see how that matters with trying to get the best the vehicle is capable of? Its a worthy goal IMO.
I don't think anyone is going to argue with that.

I keep track of every gallon of gas mine uses, it's also a great way to find out when something is due for a look over.

The point that is being stressed is don't go looking for huge increases that don't exist. In reality, spending money on "cold air intakes" and garbage like that, that may or may not increase you fuel economy 1-2 mpg, takes a lot time and gallons of gas to ever show value. 1 mpg more on 20 gallons is 20 miles(15mpg compared to 16mpg). How long does it take to recoup $300 at that rate? I'm all for keeping them tuned up and spending money on needed parts, but I have a 425rwhp Camaro for spending money foolishly.
__________________
1999 GMC Suburban K2500 SLT, 454/4L80E
1991 Z/28, 6.0L/T56
1949 GMC 250, S10 Frame, 6.0L/4L80E

Instagram @aceshighspeedshop
OutlawDrifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2016, 06:06 PM   #17
Palf70Step
State of Confusion!

 
Palf70Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 48,486
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

BTW, I did have an air-aide filter (K&N, but cheaper) & Flowmaster 50 Mufflers with true dual exhaust thru factory Cats. They probably helped economy, but not $ value wise. I did both just because I like the sound when I stomped it
__________________
Bill
1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside
2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD

Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC)

Bill's Gallery
Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift.
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!
Palf70Step is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2016, 12:40 PM   #18
83GMCK2500
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Beaverton, OR from WA State
Posts: 1,515
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

If you haven't done it yet, ditch the CSFI poppet style injectors and put one of the MPFI conversions in. I've done 3 of them now between 5.7s and 4.3s, better economy/power/throttle response out of all of them. There may be a write-up on this forum that I'm not aware of, but here is one: http://www.fuelinjector.citymaker.co...onversion.html
& another article: http://www.fourwheeler.com/how-to/10...e-fueling-fix/

What did you use for tune-up parts, brands/etc?
__________________
Devin

1983 GMC High Sierra 2500, 4x4, RC/LB, 400 S.B., SM-465, NP-208, Corporate 10 bolt & 9.5" 14 bolt
1996 GMC Sierra SLE 3500 DRW, 4x4, EC/LB, Vortec 454, NV-4500, BW-4401, AAM 925 & AAM 1050
1997 GMC Sierra SLT 1500 4x4, Z71/F44, EC/SB, Vortec 350

My Introduction with my '83s History
New Daily, the '96
83GMCK2500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2016, 10:37 AM   #19
67swb72klb
Registered User
 
67swb72klb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: livingston co.mi
Posts: 2,559
Re: Trying to get better fuel economy in my '96...

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68C15 View Post
my 99 Tahoe with 3.42 gears, 18 HWY, 16 if pulling my boat. In town I have no idea
I have a 99 Sub 2wd that I bought because I couldn't find a RCSWB and I am getting about the same mileage 3.42 gears are the difference IMO
__________________
California 65 GTO---Texas 64 burb 283 ---Oklahoma 67 CST SWB BBW wood bed 327 2004r---New Mexico 72 k10 350 350 auto---Georga 72 short step project
67swb72klb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com