Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-17-2016, 08:39 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Henderson NC
Posts: 975
|
Do any of you like the factory stance?
I had a friend who would lower every truck he ever owned but I never did. I noticed on here it seems the first thing most guys do is to lower their truck. Am I the only one on here that likes the factory stance?
|
08-17-2016, 08:40 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: @
Posts: 890
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
nope keepin mine stock
Last edited by firedemon; 08-18-2016 at 10:22 PM. |
08-17-2016, 08:52 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Leslieville alberta
Posts: 374
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
Don't likem lifted don't likem lowered likem stock
|
08-17-2016, 08:56 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Henderson NC
Posts: 975
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
I just don't get why they think it's better. They go through a lot of trouble and even cut the frame for what may be just a fad. Some of the lowered short beds look ok but I have seen some lowered that to me just doesn't look right at all.
The same with the big wheels but at least they are easy to change. Maybe I'm just getting old but I like the old school look not the latest fad look. |
08-17-2016, 09:00 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 2,189
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
It's just personal preference. I don't know why people like a lot of things, but I prefer to spend my time with things I can change, rather than that which I can't.
|
08-17-2016, 09:07 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,976
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
Stock is the best stance, bar none, for "me". I will admit that I can and do like a well done lowered swb truck - they look good - but I still wouldn't lower my swb (if I had one, that is). I'm not personally a fan of a lowered lwb C10, or even more so, a C20 in any circumstance. But, again, that's just "me"! Some people obviously like them and that's all that matters. There are plenty of lowered lwb C10 owners that can't fathom what makes me so happy to tool around in a bone stock 3/4 ton too. However, I'd submit that if you did a poll on here, slightly more folks prefer stock stance for their own truck. Well, maybe... Ha. Bottom line, it doesn't matter - do what you like. Maybe avoid irreversibly cutting the rare birds... and enjoy.
|
08-17-2016, 09:19 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 43
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
Stock height for me, too!
|
08-17-2016, 09:26 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Henderson NC
Posts: 975
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
I have nothing against lowering if that's what you like. As I said I had a friend who always lowered his trucks (this was 30 years ago). I never lowered mine and we got along just fine. As I heard someone else say, that's why they make chocolate and vanilla ice cream.
It's just that some talk as if something is wrong with the factory stance and they are fixing it. |
08-17-2016, 09:56 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 292
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
Stock stance C20's are awesome. The 8 lugs, the larger tires, the "all business" attitude. Any serious "work" truck looks great at stock height. The C30 with a flat bed, the airport fuel truck survivor, the grandpa fresh GMC with original hubcaps.
However, starting with a plain jane 2wd C10? Drop 'em all, even if just a little. Sorry, the stock height and dinky tires aren't aesthetically pleasing for most enthusiasts' eye. There's always a place for an all original vehicle of any type (even something like a totally stock 1976 Ford Torino is cool), but something as minimal as a 2" drop does wonders for the overall appearance.
__________________
1970 C10 Turbo LM7 5.3/LS6 cam PT7675/4L80E/Holley Dominator EFI/E85 Moser 9" 3.25/4 wheel discs 11.16@121.07 |
08-17-2016, 09:57 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,332
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
They've got a lot of rake to them (in the HD trucks anyway) but I like it. People raise, people lower. I just stay the same. Hubcaps coming soon...
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought 1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe 1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible |
08-17-2016, 10:10 PM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Henderson NC
Posts: 975
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
Quote:
Last edited by garyd1961; 08-17-2016 at 10:30 PM. |
|
08-17-2016, 10:12 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southern Ohio
Posts: 292
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
Agreed!
__________________
1970 C10 Turbo LM7 5.3/LS6 cam PT7675/4L80E/Holley Dominator EFI/E85 Moser 9" 3.25/4 wheel discs 11.16@121.07 |
08-17-2016, 10:17 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Klein Texas
Posts: 3,852
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
I've lowered some in the past (like 25 years ago) but I like to work my trucks so near stock height is best.
Belly dragging on the ground cockroach style doesn't do anything for me.
__________________
My Classics: '72 K20 Suburban + '65 Dodge Town Wagon '72 Corvette Roadster +'67 Corvette Roadster '73 Z-28 Camaro '63 Ford SWB Uni Pickup '50 Ford Coupe |
08-17-2016, 10:19 PM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winona Lake, IN
Posts: 6,359
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
I like the look of some lowered trucks, but I prefer mine stock height. Years ago before the advent of air bags, lowered trucks rode like crap, too bouncy. Haven't ridden in an air ride but I bet they ride much better.
__________________
70 C/10 SWB 402/TH400/3.73 "The Needy Beast" 200,000 Mile Club Disc Brake Club Owner installed options: Front Sway Bar Power Steering Power Brakes Cigar Lighter Courtesy Lights Deluxe Side Markers Wiper Delay Sliding Rear Window Power Windows Power Locks Sniper EFI 2015 Silverado 1500 LS 4.3/6L80/3.23 lowered 2" front & rear |
08-17-2016, 10:25 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. James, MO
Posts: 1,238
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
Don't like lowered at all. Stock height or (for K-series) moderate lift.
__________________
'69 Longstep K-10: 327/SM465/T-221/Closed Knuckle Dana44/12-bolt. |
08-17-2016, 10:33 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 235
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
I prefer this stance. JK. I prefer stock.
|
08-17-2016, 10:37 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 77
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
Yes and No, I really don't like knocking-off parts everytime I hit anything bigger than a tar strip, but I like when people ask me if my 2wd truck is a 4x4 ... even less.
My '71 had the perfect amount of rake but sat way too high from factory so (just starting it's resto now) I'm eliminating 2-1/2" from the fender gap up front and 3" out back, so when it's done it'll look like I think a 2wd should. My daily driver ('03 rcsb) is about to get the exact same treatment. |
08-17-2016, 10:42 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: East Tn (In the heart of the Smoky Mtns)
Posts: 1,882
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
A truck is meant to be a truck, not a car.
One can do anything they want to their vehicle, but I like mine at stock ride height. |
08-17-2016, 10:44 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: calgary alberta
Posts: 1,248
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
i think most people just want to look a little different and it just so happens everyone seems to go low. myself i did like the factory stance but i also wanted to be one of a kind so i turned a 2wd into a 4wd and made it super short just so when i goto a car show nobody has a truck that looks like mine.
|
08-18-2016, 12:39 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin & Arizona
Posts: 4,847
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
I like them the way the General made them.
I saw a slammed (a couple inches off the ground) square body crew cab 3/4 ton at Home Depot tonight. To me, it was hideous. Different strokes for different folks I guess. |
08-18-2016, 03:06 AM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: 2nd left past the stump on a dirt road.
Posts: 2,629
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
X 15 on that captain, Stock height is my bag, if I want to change mine a few turns of the screws on the hellwig overload springs in back puts a slight rake into the look. Leaf spring heavys look a bit different than the coil brothers.
|
08-18-2016, 05:15 AM | #22 |
The Niner
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Broad Brook, CT
Posts: 2,498
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
Stock height all the way
__________________
"A good racer is one whose head is in communication with his balls." - Richie Evans 1970 C/20 - 402/TH400/3.54s - 74K miles 2003 GMC Sierra 2500 - Wheatland Yellow Niner Progression Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=697183 Classic Trucks article: https://www.motortrend.com/features/...et-c20-driven/ |
08-18-2016, 07:35 AM | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Campbellsville, KY
Posts: 888
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
Funny this should come up - I was in the car driving ahead of my wife in my truck last night, and spent more time than I should have looking in the mirror watching my truck go down the road. I'm always eyeing it in parking lots and such because of the statement the moderate rake and 235/86-16's give it, but rarely get to see it with somebody else driving which is when it really makes the statement. I just think stock stance on a C20/30 is the best profile any of our trucks ever had. A C10 needs the right tire combo to keep from looking like it's got car tires under it, and a K series doesn't look too bad with 31's, but I really think those who never give stock-slung trucks a chance are going to look around some day and regret chopping every one they owned beyond ever being returned to stock. It's like making a Cummins run like a Buick 3800-series V6 - totally muzzling it.
Best side shot I have of my 'Burb, stock-sprung C10 w/HD springs and shocks on 30" tires: Snapped this of my '85 yesterday - drives as confidently as it looks
__________________
Alex V. ------ 1967 C10 Suburban, 350/NP435, Green/Green, PS, PB, HD cooling, charging, shocks, and springs. 1985 GMC C3500 SRW, Sierra Classic, 454/TH400, white/blue. Last edited by Alex V.; 08-18-2016 at 07:37 AM. Reason: Typo |
08-18-2016, 07:53 AM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Posts: 145
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
I would actually like an 1 or 2 lift, but don't see anything or anyone who has done that...
__________________
1968 GMC truck 910 Trim (Canadian) 127" WB 3 on the Three Trans (Saginaw SM330) 250 ci L6 Engine HEI ignition (early 80s L6) |
08-18-2016, 08:03 AM | #25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
|
Re: Do any of you like the factory stance?
NO!! I like lowered 2wd trucks. However, I won't put anyone down for liking the stock height. Different strokes for different folks. If we all liked the same things, the world would be boring.
__________________
|
Bookmarks |
|
|