The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2004, 02:10 PM   #1
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
275/40/17's on 8" rim?

the tire's i wanna get say they are only approved for a 9"-11" rim.

would i still beable to run them on an 8" rim?
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 02:13 PM   #2
r0lf-
Hotwheels?
 
r0lf-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Posts: 1,145
It MIGHT work... But I definitely wouldnt run them on an 8" rim. A 40 series tire isnt much sidewall.

You might be better off with a 255/45/17 tire if your stuck with 8" rims.
__________________
1978 Money Pit - CUSTOM DELUXE!!!!
r0lf- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 02:14 PM   #3
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
They will go on there. I planned on running 275/50/17's on mine. They are 8.5", but I ran 275/60/15 on 8" rims for years.
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 02:17 PM   #4
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
yeah, but the 275/60's have lots more side wall to flex and make itself fit.

if these dont fit, i'ma gonna be pissed.

i really really wanted to get the nitto 555r's on the back. and the next smaller size in them is 245/45/17s
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 02:17 PM   #5
cochran63
Registered User
 
cochran63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,057
i have 245/50/17's on my 8 inch rims
__________________
Youth soon passes away, but immaturity can last a life time.
cochran63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 02:23 PM   #6
Gibble
mmmm....Rye and Coke
 
Gibble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MB, Canada
Posts: 485
What's the stock rim width on our trucks? 8"

Because when I bought my 275/60/15's they weren't recommended to go on...but I believe it was still 'acceptable'

I'm going by my memory of the book goodyear had...I think it was recommended to get 9" rims, but they could technically be put on an 8".
Gibble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 02:31 PM   #7
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
Quote:
Originally posted by ocbaud
yeah, but the 275/60's have lots more side wall to flex and make itself fit.

if these dont fit, i'ma gonna be pissed.

i really really wanted to get the nitto 555r's on the back. and the next smaller size in them is 245/45/17s
Well it is the section width that qualifies it for a wider rim. This keeps the sidewall "straighter". With an 8" rim it will sink in at the bead .5" on each side. And the height of the sidewalls will be 4", so it should be enough to work. Unless you have to mail order them, see if whomever you are getting them from will mount them up for you. If you don't like it, get the next size.

On another note, with more rubber to the ground offered by a treaded "slick" you don't need as wide a tire, so if you question it, you can go down in size.
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 02:45 PM   #8
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
i dont wanna run skinny 245's on the back
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 03:00 PM   #9
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
Is this going to be a driver? If so I know the 555R's treadwear STINKS!
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 03:05 PM   #10
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
i dont know about FULL daily driver, but i will drive it more then dave drives his truck

i know the treadwear sucks, but it wont bother me that bad.
i guess if i had to i could get the regular nitto 555's in 255/45/17.

i just wanted to have some traction too.

also, the rims i got, they came with 2 tires, they are 275/50/17's. but i guess since the sidewall is taller, they would have fit better
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 03:19 PM   #11
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
That is why I was going to get the NT450 275/50/17's. They have the same effective height as a 275/60/15.

Don't expect much over 10K for mileage on 555R's.
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 05:01 PM   #12
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
I'm running Kumho ECSTA 712 245/40/18's on my wifes 98 and they ride great. I had them in the 225/50/16 and 255/50/16 before the new wheels and got about 40-45k out of them.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 07:15 PM   #13
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,939
A 275-40-17 should be on @ least a 9" wheel. That's the size on my GF's TA w/a 9" wheel & it looks square on the shoulders of the tire. Any less width & they will be 'pinched' @ the bead.

I will also add that IMO, this size is kind of short on her TA & would be waaayyyyy to short for a truck (they're less than 26" tall).

Are you trying to get it to hook? If so, don't mess around w/17's. They make lots of sizes in 15 & 16" DOT stickies. If you got a good deal on the wheels, horse trade them for something else & get a better size for your goals.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 07:38 PM   #14
cochran63
Registered User
 
cochran63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,057
good idea scotti... i have a set of draglites and some boot i'll trade you...lol
__________________
Youth soon passes away, but immaturity can last a life time.
cochran63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 08:28 PM   #15
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
yes, i saw a set of some 275/40/17's today and they are WAY to short for me.

i think i'll probably end up running 255/50/17's in the front and 275/50/17's in the back.
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 09:55 PM   #16
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,939
Much better.... those are @ least 27" tall.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 10:01 PM   #17
ocbaud
Garage Queen Material
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 4,129
Quote:
Originally posted by SCOTI
Much better.... those are @ least 27" tall.
yeah, this truck at my girlfriend's apartments has an obs truck, with 10" WIRE rims sticking out and they had 275/40/17" directional tires on it facing the wrong direction:p

of course this is the same apartments where there is a 90ish red camero with a Type-R badge on the sides and back.

but anyway, yeah, the 275/40's are WAY to low profile for a truck.

now i need to find a way to get my front end lower again. removing a lot of that old crap and installing the engine with all its aluminum took a lot of weight off of it. I used to have about an 1" of rake, and now it seems like the front may be heigher
ocbaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 10:05 PM   #18
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally posted by ocbaud
but anyway, yeah, the 275/40's are WAY to low profile for a truck.now i need to find a way to get my front end lower again. removing a lot of that old crap and installing the engine with all its aluminum took a lot of weight off of it. I used to have about an 1" of rake, and now it seems like the front may be heigher
I agree, the 255/50 17's up front (27") with 275/50 17's out back (27.8") will make the truck look perfect. That should give you just enough rake.
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2004, 11:34 PM   #19
odie82
Registered User
 
odie82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: minnesota
Posts: 349
I'm running 275/40r17 on front and got 285/40r17 for the rear,work great and there not that low of a profile.

running 17x9's all around
__________________
1982 chevy C-10, blue 2wd shortbox
17x9 cragar ss rims, 350V8-th400

2003 suzuki gsxr 1000-hit 175mph!!!
yeah it's fast-no you can't ride it
odie82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com