The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-15-2009, 08:45 AM   #1
tomlamb
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: So Cal, CA
Posts: 185
GTO IRS in c10

I have been thinking of what to do with the suspension on my truck and would like to float an idea. What do you think of using a GTO rear sub assembly in our trucks? A guy on e-bay said he has a bunch of these and at first glance it looks like it may be able to work with our trucks. While I know someone like Nate or Scotts could graft them in and make them work, the big question would be how hard would it be to do so and would it be worth it for someone like Nate to make an install kit?

The assembly has 3.46 with locker, disk brakes, 5x4.75 bolt pattern, and a backing plate to backing plate measurement of 58". The front mount holes are 48" apart and the rear mounting is in the center behind the dif. The driveshaft connects through a rubber bushing so something would have to be done to connect it to a standard U-joint. The GTO weighs ~3800Lbs and the assembly is designed for a 400HP LS2.

So the questions are:
Will it work without a massive re-engineering effort?
What ride heights could be done?
Would anyone be interested?
tomlamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 10:36 AM   #2
Wild83C10
Registered User
 
Wild83C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 910
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Killer price. $300, damn! I think the complexity would depend on the dimensions and where everything would line up with the frame.
You would need to z the frame and build some crossmembers to pickup the mounting locations. Then build some spring pockets.
I don't know if it would be worth it, unless you are looking for something different. You would probably improve the ride quality and maybe improve handling. I don't think it will help you get the truck any lower.
__________________
83 C10 Stepside (SOLD, it was a blast!)

383 MASS-FLO EFI/TKO II 600/3.90 Posi 10 bolt
S475 and C4 DM running, fine tuning
turbo=
Douchebag Racing: Runs Fine all the Time
Wild83C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 11:18 AM   #3
tomlamb
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: So Cal, CA
Posts: 185
Re: GTO IRS in c10

For myself, I am not looking to lay frame, I am more into the handling side for every day driving. Something like a 3-4" drop is the stance I like but I'm not sure why you said a frame Z would be needed. I agree some cross members and spring pocket or coil over would be needed, but doing the Z would take the bolt on Kit aspect out of the options and I would like to keep the bed standard. As I am not very knowledgeable on suspension fabrication, why do you think a Z would be necessary?
I do like the something different part, but also the disk and locker for the price looks good.
tomlamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2009, 10:06 PM   #4
Wild83C10
Registered User
 
Wild83C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 910
Re: GTO IRS in c10

I said z-ing the frame because I figured you would want to go low. With a 3-4 inch drop you might not have too. Like I said though, it is really going to depend on how everything lines up.
For that price though it may be worth getting it to see how it fits under there. I would see if you could get some dimensions first.
__________________
83 C10 Stepside (SOLD, it was a blast!)

383 MASS-FLO EFI/TKO II 600/3.90 Posi 10 bolt
S475 and C4 DM running, fine tuning
turbo=
Douchebag Racing: Runs Fine all the Time
Wild83C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 08:45 AM   #5
tomlamb
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: So Cal, CA
Posts: 185
Re: GTO IRS in c10

wild83c10 Thanks for the tip.

Would anyone else be interested in this type of setup or is this a hair brained idea?
tomlamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 09:50 AM   #6
andrewmp6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Why not a jag irs or even one out of a thunderbird both would be cheaper.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 10:28 AM   #7
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Quote:
Originally Posted by tomlamb View Post
wild83c10 Thanks for the tip.

Would anyone else be interested in this type of setup or is this a hair brained idea?
It's not that it's a bad idea, just that as far as I know it hasn't been done. At least by anyone that posts on the forums I visit.

While the purchase price is very reasonable, you have to factor in other costs. Since it sounds like you might not have the ability to do the fabrication work it would require for the install, that will add considerable cost.

It will also require some R&D which translates to trial & error unless you are lucky enough to get it set up correctly the first try. I'm guessing from my experience on such ventures that it's not going to happen.

If you just won't a mild drop with a suspension that handles better that what you have, I think there might be better ways to accomplish that goal.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 10:34 AM   #8
tomlamb
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: So Cal, CA
Posts: 185
Re: GTO IRS in c10

I haven't looked at the T-Bird, I was looking at the GTO because it is a modern rear, 3:42, Disks, track lock, and designed for 400HP in similar weight. As a plus, $300 for the complete setup looked like a deal. Has anyone done this type of IRS? I have seen the Jag setup on hot-rods but I think parts would be way north of $300...
tomlamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 11:02 AM   #9
tomlamb
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: So Cal, CA
Posts: 185
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX View Post
It's not that it's a bad idea, just that as far as I know it hasn't been done. At least by anyone that posts on the forums I visit.

While the purchase price is very reasonable, you have to factor in other costs. Since it sounds like you might not have the ability to do the fabrication work it would require for the install, that will add considerable cost.

It will also require some R&D which translates to trial & error unless you are lucky enough to get it set up correctly the first try. I'm guessing from my experience on such ventures that it's not going to happen.

If you just won't a mild drop with a suspension that handles better that what you have, I think there might be better ways to accomplish that goal.
I definitely get what you are saying. Not being a fabricator myself, trial and error install would not be in my cards. I would want someone like Nate or Scotts that are experts in suspension to do the install so that the geometry would be correct but you pose a good question, how much trial and error would someone like that be subject to? I also do like the “something different/new” concept so that’s the reason I started looking at it in the first place. Given that converting to disk, track lock, reinforcing arms or 4-bar, shocks and springs would cost $x would the GTO concept be better, and if so, how much more would it end up costing is the key question.

When I first thought about this I was thinking it would be great to have a Kit like the Dropmember C4 but given the responses thus far it may be barking up the wrong tree but I figured no harm at least posing the question
tomlamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 11:43 AM   #10
meansting04
Registered User
 
meansting04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: travis afb
Posts: 304
Re: GTO IRS in c10

It sounds like a good idea, but i had an 04 gto and these things are not strong. Always bending and breaking the stub shafts. The cvs and the halfshafts are way undersized, even if you step up to the 05-06 model year. They also have to have the craddle shimmed and aligned to work properly. If you go with a complete aftermarket lsd from kazz you are looking at 3500-5000$, most people making big power do this or solid axel swap. There are some companies like pedders that make aftermarket bushings and harrop makes a good cover all of which is expensive. Check out www.ls2gto.com. It is a good forum that can give you loads of info on these units. Just my experiece and .02 cents. After 18 months, 2 craddle adjustments, 4 stub shaft, one stuck side gear, and one twisted half shaft enough was enough for me. BTW mine only had 345 horse and torque at the wheels, it was a 6 speed with 24k on it.
__________________
67 gmc 1/2 ton, 5.0 v6, 4 speed SOLD!!
70 Chevy C-10, 355, th400, 3.73's 2/4 drop
meansting04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 12:17 PM   #11
meansting04
Registered User
 
meansting04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: travis afb
Posts: 304
Re: GTO IRS in c10

after closer inspection of the pics, if you can incoperate the craddle into your frame somehow it would be better, however the strenght of the parts is still to question. BTW the rubber isolator is a big downfall due to the give, but there are companies that make one piece non rubber replacements($$$$)
__________________
67 gmc 1/2 ton, 5.0 v6, 4 speed SOLD!!
70 Chevy C-10, 355, th400, 3.73's 2/4 drop
meansting04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 01:21 PM   #12
m6z
Registered User
 
m6z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pittsburg, KS
Posts: 2,466
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Quote:
Originally Posted by meansting04 View Post
It sounds like a good idea, but i had an 04 gto and these things are not strong. Always bending and breaking the stub shafts. The cvs and the halfshafts are way undersized, even if you step up to the 05-06 model year. They also have to have the craddle shimmed and aligned to work properly. If you go with a complete aftermarket lsd from kazz you are looking at 3500-5000$, most people making big power do this or solid axel swap. There are some companies like pedders that make aftermarket bushings and harrop makes a good cover all of which is expensive. Check out www.ls2gto.com. It is a good forum that can give you loads of info on these units. Just my experiece and .02 cents. After 18 months, 2 craddle adjustments, 4 stub shaft, one stuck side gear, and one twisted half shaft enough was enough for me. BTW mine only had 345 horse and torque at the wheels, it was a 6 speed with 24k on it.
You must of flogged the **** out of that car. lol.

I know of around 6 or 7 gto's in tulsa that are making 390-500+ rwh and none of these guys have broke a diff. Clutches, yes, but so far no one has had any problems with the rear. And all of these guys are track regulars on drag radials.
__________________
Doug

Looking for a 67-72 short bed driver.....

Last edited by m6z; 02-16-2009 at 01:23 PM.
m6z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 01:27 PM   #13
m6z
Registered User
 
m6z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pittsburg, KS
Posts: 2,466
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Quote:
Originally Posted by meansting04 View Post
after closer inspection of the pics, if you can incoperate the craddle into your frame somehow it would be better, however the strenght of the parts is still to question. BTW the rubber isolator is a big downfall due to the give, but there are companies that make one piece non rubber replacements($$$$)
Yeah you would have to buy the adapter so you could use a standard drive shaft. At $459 that kinda kills the budget aspect. I'm not sure if anyone else makes the adapter.

http://bmrfabrication.com/GTO.htm
__________________
Doug

Looking for a 67-72 short bed driver.....

Last edited by m6z; 02-16-2009 at 01:28 PM.
m6z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 03:53 PM   #14
tomlamb
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: So Cal, CA
Posts: 185
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Quote:
Originally Posted by m6z View Post
Yeah you would have to buy the adapter so you could use a standard drive shaft. At $459 that kinda kills the budget aspect. I'm not sure if anyone else makes the adapter.

http://bmrfabrication.com/GTO.htm
I found that Inland Empire Driveline has a 1350 U-Joint flange that will bolt to the GTO Diff for $150 so that may not as big of an issue...
tomlamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2009, 10:57 PM   #15
meansting04
Registered User
 
meansting04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: travis afb
Posts: 304
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Never tracked the car, couple of dyno runs. The whole time i owned it i put less than 5k on the car. Just a bad lsd. Solid axle is the way to stay. The gto club i was in out here in Cali. had broke diffs all the time. Maybe we just drive them how they were meant to be driven?
__________________
67 gmc 1/2 ton, 5.0 v6, 4 speed SOLD!!
70 Chevy C-10, 355, th400, 3.73's 2/4 drop
meansting04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 12:32 PM   #16
menace121978
Registered User
 
menace121978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: orangevale, ca
Posts: 3,626
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Quote:
Originally Posted by meansting04 View Post
Never tracked the car, couple of dyno runs. The whole time i owned it i put less than 5k on the car. Just a bad lsd. Solid axle is the way to stay. The gto club i was in out here in Cali. had broke diffs all the time. Maybe we just drive them how they were meant to be driven?
LOL!! yes the rear end is the weak link in the goats drivetrain. be careful if you do buy one because there is a service bulliton(sp) on them. no recall. they just replace them if they are whinning or one leggers. and the wheel hop is terrible. and we do drive them how there supposed to be driven!!LOL
__________________
"Dennis the Menace"



1978 Silverado (2wd, 1/2 ton, short bed)complete nut & bolt frame off restomod LQ9/4L80E
MY LS SWAP/FRAME OFF BUILD BOOK

2006 TBSS way too much to list
menace121978 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 02:49 PM   #17
m6z
Registered User
 
m6z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pittsburg, KS
Posts: 2,466
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Quote:
Originally Posted by menace121978 View Post
LOL!! yes the rear end is the weak link in the goats drivetrain. be careful if you do buy one because there is a service bulliton(sp) on them. no recall. they just replace them if they are whinning or one leggers. and the wheel hop is terrible. and we do drive them how there supposed to be driven!!LOL
Yeah. I read it all the time that their junk. But none of the guys in tulsa have broke a rear yet. All low 12's to 11 second cars. Maybe they just never hooked up good enough to frag anything? We will see this summer, a few more cars will have spray....

No one has even broke a drive shaft or the rubber coupler that connects it.
__________________
Doug

Looking for a 67-72 short bed driver.....
m6z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2009, 10:14 PM   #18
meansting04
Registered User
 
meansting04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: travis afb
Posts: 304
Re: GTO IRS in c10

I would hook great on the streets with dot slicks, but it was short lived. I had the thunk in the trunk, pegg leg, cradle adjustment problems, and leaks. Got better with a cover and great bushings. Not a bad concept just terrible parts. Keep looking for a "better"center section. Maybe a Vette's.
__________________
67 gmc 1/2 ton, 5.0 v6, 4 speed SOLD!!
70 Chevy C-10, 355, th400, 3.73's 2/4 drop
meansting04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 01:11 PM   #19
Damien
Registered User
 
Damien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Farmington, MN
Posts: 928
Re: GTO IRS in c10

The bolt pattern in not quite 5x 4.75. High Performance Pontiac did an artical about putting GTO wheels on a Firebird and had to enlarge the holes slightly. It's only a few mm, but worth noting.
__________________
I can still count my vehicles on two... wait three hands.
Damien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 02:33 PM   #20
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,938
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
The bolt pattern in not quite 5x 4.75. High Performance Pontiac did an artical about putting GTO wheels on a Firebird and had to enlarge the holes slightly. It's only a few mm, but worth noting.
This is similar to using BMW wheels on a 4.75" GM car pattern which is a popular swap for guys wanting a 'touring' look wheel on a budget. They'll physically fit but ultimately you run the risk of torsional twist causing the studs to fail (thus it is dangerous). It may not happen to everyone, but it can (and has) happened.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 09:24 PM   #21
tomlamb
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: So Cal, CA
Posts: 185
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Well... Not much interest in the kit concept with the GTO IRS and with questionable capacity so.... anyone have any other new ideas for IRS? I know the vette system has been done but the parts are $$$, was looking at the Charger/300 rear setup but it's higher priced than the GTO, no locker and lower gear ratio and I am not sure if it’s rep is better or worse than the GTO.
tomlamb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 10:07 PM   #22
p8ntballer1911
Bodydropped71
 
p8ntballer1911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Conroe Texas
Posts: 264
Re: GTO IRS in c10

I wouldnt go for the crysler/dodge IRS. I own a dodge charger and theres some things i dont like about it. Some knocks when switching gears sometimes and a few other things.
p8ntballer1911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 10:50 PM   #23
Frizzle Fry
Registered User
 
Frizzle Fry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hillsboro Oregon
Posts: 6,449
Re: GTO IRS in c10

How 'bout an Expedition 8.8 IRS?
Frizzle Fry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2009, 11:17 PM   #24
meansting04
Registered User
 
meansting04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: travis afb
Posts: 304
Re: GTO IRS in c10

Quote:
Originally Posted by p8ntballer1911 View Post
I wouldnt go for the crysler/dodge IRS. I own a dodge charger and theres some things i dont like about it. Some knocks when switching gears sometimes and a few other things.
Same thing with the goat. There is a lot to be desired with drive line slop in the IRS cars. This is one thing that really messed with me on this style. They spend so much time making it fit that form becomes second to the functionality. I replaced almost all of mine by the time it was said and done and 4k later i cut my losses. Its not a bad rear end, but it ain't good either.
__________________
67 gmc 1/2 ton, 5.0 v6, 4 speed SOLD!!
70 Chevy C-10, 355, th400, 3.73's 2/4 drop
meansting04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 07:06 PM   #25
Blansho
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Sinaloa Mexico
Posts: 1
Smile Re: GTO IRS in c10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frizzle Fry View Post
How 'bout an Expedition 8.8 IRS?

That is what i am doing right now
Blansho is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com