Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-06-2017, 09:22 PM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Victor, NY
Posts: 218
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
Go Rochester. Partial for one reason only...I've lived here all my life. The plant they were made in still stands and produces fuel rails for GM an others as we speak. Still know some old timers who worked the line back in the day. I remember touring the plant back in high school and they were using early robotics to "auto tweak" things. Good memories.
|
04-06-2017, 09:25 PM | #27 | ||
"I ain't nobody, dork."
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
I would use a worn out Q-jet before I would use any Edelbrock carb.
I'm a dyed in the wool Holley guy... but still love a properly rebuilt and tuned Q-jet. Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars... My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread. The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-06-2017, 10:33 PM | #28 |
Who Changed This?
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,676
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
To add to my previous post- the Q-Jet is a TON simpler than those 4GC Rochesters I cut my teeth on when rebuilding them in the '60s. Take off the air horn and turn it over, and HOPE you can figure out where all those check balls and springs came from, with that fuzzy 10th generation photocopy of the exploded diagram, when you're only 16 and it's your first carb overhaul.
__________________
~Steven '70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper Simi Valley, CA |
04-06-2017, 11:33 PM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,937
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
Dislike Edel carbs. Especially some of the AFB clones which have no adjustment for the secondary flap opening rate without disassembly.
So, yet another vote for the Quadrapuke. Only say that because like many, I endured years disdain & snide remarks. The later models are my favorites too. Some time around 74-75 they moved access to the APT from the baseplate to the top. Replace the press-in plug with thread type and you are good to go. 800-cfm models can be identified by bulges in the primary venturi. May be mistaken, no chevy motors ever got those. Look toward large displacement BOP&C engines.
__________________
1969 c-10 Step Side Long Bed. I-6 250cid = = 1969 Pontiac GTO hard top. 400, 4-speed. |
04-06-2017, 11:40 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: 2nd left past the stump on a dirt road.
Posts: 2,629
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
The only advantage of the Eddi is the simplicity. They are easy peasy to tune. Plus you get the option of a manual choke.
Not so for the Quad, even though I would rather have one. I missed that ole air whipping vacuum slurp when I hit the throttle. |
04-07-2017, 01:07 AM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: El Dorado Ca
Posts: 3,374
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
send me your edelbrocks,I love them, have them on four of my trucks and they run great,easy to rebuild, rebuilt one that a friend gave me and it is on my 72K20 ,bought a book and was real easy...although I like the q-jet I l have on my 74K20 with a 454...it has been great and has been on the truck since 1995 when I installed the 454,carb is still working great,so no reason to change it, I may try and rebuild it when it is time...
|
04-07-2017, 01:21 AM | #32 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: El Dorado Ca
Posts: 3,374
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
Quote:
|
|
04-07-2017, 05:54 PM | #33 | ||
"I ain't nobody, dork."
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
While digging for an old article from the late 1990's that I used from 4-Wheel & Offroad magazine on rebuilding the Quadrajet carb I found some good stuff. I had a 1979 GMC K2500 with a really snotty 355 in it. I rebuilt the Q-jet using the step by step process from the above magazine. It was a great how-to by that rag and I wish I could find it again.
But this website from a Florida offroad group has a LOT of info on Quadrajet and other carbs as well. https://www.florida4x4.com/tech/quadrajet/ Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars... My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread. The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-10-2017, 02:31 AM | #34 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Sonoma County California
Posts: 83
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
Quote:
I have a Casting Number 7029207. Sometimes when I punch it the secondaries will not open. One time I was driving it pretty good on the freeway and up a few slight hills, and when I got off it died coming to a stop light. It started up right away but then died again when turning into a driveway bout a minute later. Both times I smelt gas. My girlfriend said it even happened to her driving in town. The timing is 8 BTDC. It sill has the original air pump on it! It has one vacuum line going to it from the right side of the carb. Maybe I should disconnect it and plug up that vacuum line. |
|
04-10-2017, 09:28 AM | #35 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,731
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
Quote:
|
|
04-10-2017, 10:14 AM | #36 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: lakefield,mn
Posts: 566
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
Quote:
If your secondary's aren't opening that usually an adjustment issues. Is the choke all the way open when it is warmed up? The secondary's will only open when the choke is all the way open. Are the choke pull offs working? When it quit running could be possible that you choke is not open all way and allowing it to flood on deceleration. When you shut the truck off look down the carb and see if you see any fuel dripping down. Could also be a float issue.
__________________
68 c10 swb stepper 68 c10 swb stepper 67 c10 lwb 06 gmc duramax |
|
04-11-2017, 01:24 AM | #37 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: El Dorado Ca
Posts: 3,374
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
I just got my Cliff Ruggles book, wow there are alot of parts and different little adjustments to be made...I love my edelbrocks for their simplicity and ease of rebuilding, I may not try rebuilding a q-jet after all
|
04-11-2017, 10:12 AM | #38 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Sonoma County California
Posts: 83
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
Quote:
The choke opens. I was adjusting the idle air fuel mixture and it was open. But when trying to adjust it I would screw one all the way in untill the engine started to slow down. Then I backed it out but the engine never slowed down again. I was afraid the screw was going to come all the way out. What's up with that? There is a knowledgeable guy on youtube about Q-jets, its WhoSaidTyler. Lots of good info there. |
|
04-11-2017, 02:11 PM | #39 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,731
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
Quote:
|
|
04-11-2017, 04:58 PM | #40 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: El Dorado Ca
Posts: 3,374
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
Quote:
|
|
04-12-2017, 12:33 PM | #41 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Sonoma County California
Posts: 83
|
Re: Carburetor fun: Rochester Vs. Edelbrock?
Quote:
Ok, thhanks. Here is how I tried to adjust it https://youtu.be/XRCUibTkm3o |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|