Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-05-2016, 09:43 AM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: hickory, ky
Posts: 1,311
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
Back to the original question. I've owned several 67-72s as well as 55-66s and this one is the very 1st automatic I've had. That tells me that just like 1932 Fords, there are more [ 32s and automatics], on the road than there was back then. My SPID says that my truck came with a turbo 350 so its gonna stay. I love grinding gears but I also am tall and like the legroom. I guess Im a "girl"
|
06-05-2016, 10:09 AM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Spring Hill, Florida
Posts: 465
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
Not that 67-72 trucks were bought as toys for soccer moms (or dads) to drive to the groceries store like your average $50k truck these days, but I think a lot of the manual trans trucks were bought to do work. Serious hard work. As a result they sat out side, worked hard day in and day out, simply got abused, and eventually used up.
I don't know how true this is but the fact that you see more c20's and c30's with this setup would seem to support the idea. Manuals were trusted, reliable, and easier to fix when they broke. Auto trans in the c10 was so you could pick up what you needed but the wife could still drive. I also think the idea of a Auto in a truck was fairly new and probably had a novelty to it that made people say lets give it a try. As I was not born until the mid 80's this is just me remembering the attitude my dad and grandpa might have had back in the day. |
06-05-2016, 05:38 PM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: S. Georgia
Posts: 254
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
Well I am from the time period and dad operated a business so from time to time he had to invest into mid sized and smaller trucks. One big determining factor was price. Things were different back then. There was no such thing as 18 years olds getting 50 and 60 thousand dollar trucks back then. People didn't have the money they have now. An automatic was an expensive upgrade and for a business or personal, it was important to keep cost down. So if you needed a bare minimum truck like a c-10, you got the least optioned truck which came with the standard tranny. Now people that had more money and in the early 70's more money was around, nice options came available. I remember traveling to south florida on business with dad, mom, and my two brothers. 9 hour drive, mid August, no air. Also, dehydration wasn't invented yet, you were just told to sit as quiet as possible and shut up. Of course three boys in the back of a four door with temps in the 100's, not an easy thing to do.
|
06-06-2016, 06:47 AM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: danbury, ct.
Posts: 568
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
I wouldn't have it any other way. My C30 gets worked hauling wood and boats. I looked long and hard too find a truck with a standard trans (sm465 trans truck) and my patience paid off with an all original C30. You can't beat a granny gear for when you get stopped at a light on a hill with a full load... I think my truck would be incredibly boring with an automatic but that's just me.
|
06-06-2016, 07:58 AM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Campbellsville, KY
Posts: 888
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
Ditto, Ken B. Keep on rolling with that straight-cut first!
__________________
Alex V. ------ 1967 C10 Suburban, 350/NP435, Green/Green, PS, PB, HD cooling, charging, shocks, and springs. 1985 GMC C3500 SRW, Sierra Classic, 454/TH400, white/blue. |
06-06-2016, 09:02 AM | #31 |
All about them K’s
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Land of Entrapment
Posts: 6,504
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
Ken B. That's a beautiful truck!
__________________
Tyler '57 3100 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=813888 '72 K20 Cheyenne: 5” lift, 35’s, front dana 60 blah blah blah… http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=662879 ‘69 K10 SWB: 4” lift 33”s… in a million pieces http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=805206 '98 Silverado LT K2500HD ECLB Vortec 454/4l80E: 6" lift 35x12.5x20’s |
06-06-2016, 10:03 AM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,229
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
I can't answer the question, since our '69 GMC (bought new) was a 6 cylinder three on the tree (which we converted to four on the floor).
It's intended usage was 2nd vehicle/daily driver use, with occasional trailering and parts chasing. K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly 1979-1986 GM Full Size Truck Engineering 1986 - 2019 Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926 My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524 Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/ |
06-06-2016, 11:30 AM | #33 | |
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
Quote:
I would venture a guess that the vast majority of auto 67-72's on the road today (especially 67-69/70's) were originally manual trucks. The "stupid easy-ness" of installing a 700R4 is mostly to blame. I mean, it really is unbelievable easy and affordable to do it. I had a new rebuilt trans (from local place), crossmember, lines, aux. cooler, and bowtie overdrives TVmadeEZ and TC brake switch for a little over a grand. My A/C kit was more than that. The other big factor is the LS. Plain and simple, a modern vehicle with a manual is rare. So the most affordable and easy way to run an LS is to use the entire donor, or at least the LS and 4L60 it came with. Soooooo many trucks have an LS and auto now. In my local truck club (and we have A LOT of members) I'd say close to half of the classic trucks are LS now. We do have one guy that bucked the trend and went LS with a 6spd. Awesome original paint truck too.
__________________
Jesse James 1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73 1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc 1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken! 2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71 2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd 2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo 2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride American Born, Country by the Grace of God 1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild! My 1967 C-10 Build Thread My Vintage Air A/C Install Project "On a Dime" Trying my hand at Home Renovation! 1965 Mustang Modifications! Last edited by 67ChevyRedneck; 06-06-2016 at 11:40 AM. |
|
06-06-2016, 11:31 PM | #34 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: S. Georgia
Posts: 254
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
Awesome looking truck!
|
05-26-2017, 04:45 PM | #35 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orange City, Florida
Posts: 76
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
So, I just bought a 72 LWB. Originally a 6cyl someone converted. Must have been 3OTT but that linkage is gone. There is a shifter on the floor. It is REALLY bad. I also sits back in a different spot then the shifters I've seen here on the board. In any case, what was the factory 3 speed trans that came in the truck, and how can I identify which one I have?
Sorry, I'm new here... |
05-27-2017, 06:27 AM | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: EDEN GA
Posts: 191
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
My 71 is a manual and I would not have bought it if it would have been a auto.
|
05-27-2017, 08:13 AM | #37 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mt Brydges Ontario
Posts: 181
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
I just took a 3 speed out of a 70 C10 to the recycler. Had it advertised for $50 and had no interest so it was in the way and had to go. I would have given it to someone who could use it. I guess what is old and unpopular is new and cool because 3months ago no one wanted a 3 speed.
|
05-27-2017, 08:18 AM | #38 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: EDEN GA
Posts: 191
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
Quote:
|
|
05-27-2017, 10:25 AM | #39 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. James, MO
Posts: 1,238
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
Quote:
Heck, I put a manual in my originally PG-equipped '67 'way back when--first a 3-speed, then a 4-speed car tranny.
__________________
'69 Longstep K-10: 327/SM465/T-221/Closed Knuckle Dana44/12-bolt. |
|
05-27-2017, 03:41 PM | #40 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 165
|
Re: Why are manual trans C10's so rare
I bought a used '67 step 327 3 on the tree in 1970. I could only live with it for a month until switching for a muncie 4 speed and Hurst shifter. Completely transformed the driving experience. No comparison.
Now almost 50 years later I picked up another '67 step with a T400 auto trans, and only I lasted only a few months before jerking it out and dropping in a T56 magnum 6 speed. The truck is so much more fun to drive now. No more slow lane on the freeway, and it takes me back to the feeling of taking my old truck though the gears with 4 close ratios. The engine is always in the power band. I learned to drive in a 55 Chevy 6 cylinder 3 on the tree and can remember the feeling, sound and smell on that day. It brings back smile to this day. Russ
__________________
RC |
Bookmarks |
|
|