|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-26-2017, 11:34 PM
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: PHX, AZ
Posts: 556
|
Re: 7.3 stroker vs. 5.9 cummins
If you do a 95 to 97 powerstoke it is more "self Contained" in that it does not need an external fuel pump of a charge air cooler. They are super reliable and are capable of a lot of easy power with a tune. I had a 12 valve gmc project at one point, and in retrospect the 7.3l powerstroke would have been a cool unique set up.
__________________
My Chevy habit is paid for by Ford diesels... Here is my SLOW LS install: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...55#post6456355 Caliper Rebuild: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=613748 Upper Control Arm Bushings: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=616974 IG mattcrp1 |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode