![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Osos Ca
Posts: 560
|
Re: why the difference
Yes,
More pictures by you or anybody else would be great, Thanks
__________________
65 short stepside K10 292-SM420-T221 8 lug closed D44 front NoSpin HO72 4.10 rear |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: corktown,mi.
Posts: 5,199
|
Re: why the difference
here u go
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: corktown,mi.
Posts: 5,199
|
Re: why the difference
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Los Osos Ca
Posts: 560
|
Re: why the difference
I'm trying to figure out what I have in my pile 'o parts.
My two solid sticks are identical, but the multi-piece one is thicker and about 6" shorter, plus the bend is closer to the base. Would this be correct for a 65? Are the transmission towers different depending on which stick it came with, or are they all interchangeable? Finally has anybody replaced the rubber within the lower end? Factory manual refers to them as 'Polyurethane "O" rings'. Where would you get the correct part? Thanks, Tom
__________________
65 short stepside K10 292-SM420-T221 8 lug closed D44 front NoSpin HO72 4.10 rear |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: corktown,mi.
Posts: 5,199
|
Re: why the difference
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hancock Md
Posts: 431
|
Re: why the difference
Quote:
Novak sells the solid one and says this as title "Stick, shifter cane, SM420 & SM465 transmissions, upgraded one-piece version" Last edited by 350TacoZilla; 03-12-2019 at 02:45 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|